From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Cleanup PMU related code Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 01:30:23 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAPLW+4kmUqg=2vYOiWfMhQFqFw1sh0Eo6Yqv8nPEbV_0MObn5A@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <c16afd75-f54c-6c2b-7f61-1f1c7a4b3c46@roeck-us.net> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 00:33, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > On 11/23/21 8:17 AM, Sam Protsenko wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 18:06, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 06:56:44PM +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote: > >>> Now that PMU enablement code was extended for new Exynos SoCs, it > >>> doesn't look very cohesive and consistent anymore. Do a bit of renaming, > >>> grouping and style changes, to make it look good again. While at it, add > >>> quirks documentation as well. > >>> > >>> No functional change, just a refactoring commit. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> > >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> > >>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > >>> --- > >>> Changes in v4: > >>> - Added R-b tag by Guenter Roeck > >>> > >>> Changes in v3: > >>> - Added quirks documentation > >>> - Added R-b tag by Krzysztof Kozlowski > >>> > >>> Changes in v2: > >>> - (none): it's a new patch > >>> > >>> drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > >>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c > >>> index ec341c876225..f211be8bf976 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c > >>> @@ -56,17 +56,51 @@ > >>> #define EXYNOS5_RST_STAT_REG_OFFSET 0x0404 > >>> #define EXYNOS5_WDT_DISABLE_REG_OFFSET 0x0408 > >>> #define EXYNOS5_WDT_MASK_RESET_REG_OFFSET 0x040c > >>> -#define QUIRK_HAS_PMU_CONFIG (1 << 0) > >>> -#define QUIRK_HAS_RST_STAT (1 << 1) > >>> -#define QUIRK_HAS_WTCLRINT_REG (1 << 2) > >>> + > >>> +/** > >> > >> 0-day complains: > >> > >> drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c:94: warning: expecting prototype for Quirk flags for different Samsung watchdog IP(). Prototype was for QUIRK_HAS_WTCLRINT_REG() instead > >> > >> It doesn't seem to like the idea of documented bit masks. Not really sure > >> what to do here. I am inclined to ignore it, but I don't want to get flooded > >> by 0-day complaints until I retire either. Any idea ? > >> > > > > Seems like 0-day thinks this kernel-doc comment is for the first > > define only, and thus the comment has wrong format, or something like > > that. I tried to follow the same style as GFP_KERNEL and others are > > documented. > > > > Anyway, if you don't like 0-day complaints, can you please just > > replace kernel-doc comment (/**) with regular comment (/*), by > > removing one asterisk in the patch? Or I can re-send the patch > > correspondingly -- then just let me know. > > > > Oh, never mind. Let's just hope that 0-day stops complaining at some point. > Just sent v5 for this patch, fixing that 0-day warning properly. Found info about it here: [1]. So to check that warning, apparently it's enough to run "make W=n" build, or dry-run for kernel-doc script like this: $ scripts/kernel-doc -v -none drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c Anyway, please take v4 series + v5 for this patch. Hope that'll be all for 0-day swearing :) [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst > Guenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Cleanup PMU related code Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 01:30:23 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAPLW+4kmUqg=2vYOiWfMhQFqFw1sh0Eo6Yqv8nPEbV_0MObn5A@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <c16afd75-f54c-6c2b-7f61-1f1c7a4b3c46@roeck-us.net> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 00:33, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > On 11/23/21 8:17 AM, Sam Protsenko wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 18:06, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 06:56:44PM +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote: > >>> Now that PMU enablement code was extended for new Exynos SoCs, it > >>> doesn't look very cohesive and consistent anymore. Do a bit of renaming, > >>> grouping and style changes, to make it look good again. While at it, add > >>> quirks documentation as well. > >>> > >>> No functional change, just a refactoring commit. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> > >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> > >>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > >>> --- > >>> Changes in v4: > >>> - Added R-b tag by Guenter Roeck > >>> > >>> Changes in v3: > >>> - Added quirks documentation > >>> - Added R-b tag by Krzysztof Kozlowski > >>> > >>> Changes in v2: > >>> - (none): it's a new patch > >>> > >>> drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > >>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c > >>> index ec341c876225..f211be8bf976 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c > >>> @@ -56,17 +56,51 @@ > >>> #define EXYNOS5_RST_STAT_REG_OFFSET 0x0404 > >>> #define EXYNOS5_WDT_DISABLE_REG_OFFSET 0x0408 > >>> #define EXYNOS5_WDT_MASK_RESET_REG_OFFSET 0x040c > >>> -#define QUIRK_HAS_PMU_CONFIG (1 << 0) > >>> -#define QUIRK_HAS_RST_STAT (1 << 1) > >>> -#define QUIRK_HAS_WTCLRINT_REG (1 << 2) > >>> + > >>> +/** > >> > >> 0-day complains: > >> > >> drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c:94: warning: expecting prototype for Quirk flags for different Samsung watchdog IP(). Prototype was for QUIRK_HAS_WTCLRINT_REG() instead > >> > >> It doesn't seem to like the idea of documented bit masks. Not really sure > >> what to do here. I am inclined to ignore it, but I don't want to get flooded > >> by 0-day complaints until I retire either. Any idea ? > >> > > > > Seems like 0-day thinks this kernel-doc comment is for the first > > define only, and thus the comment has wrong format, or something like > > that. I tried to follow the same style as GFP_KERNEL and others are > > documented. > > > > Anyway, if you don't like 0-day complaints, can you please just > > replace kernel-doc comment (/**) with regular comment (/*), by > > removing one asterisk in the patch? Or I can re-send the patch > > correspondingly -- then just let me know. > > > > Oh, never mind. Let's just hope that 0-day stops complaining at some point. > Just sent v5 for this patch, fixing that 0-day warning properly. Found info about it here: [1]. So to check that warning, apparently it's enough to run "make W=n" build, or dry-run for kernel-doc script like this: $ scripts/kernel-doc -v -none drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c Anyway, please take v4 series + v5 for this patch. Hope that'll be all for 0-day swearing :) [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst > Guenter _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-23 23:30 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-11-21 16:56 [PATCH v4 00/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Add Exynos850 support Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] dt-bindings: watchdog: Require samsung,syscon-phandle for Exynos7 Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] dt-bindings: watchdog: Require samsung, syscon-phandle " Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] dt-bindings: watchdog: Document Exynos850 watchdog bindings Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Fail probe if can't find valid timeout Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Let kernel kick watchdog Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Make reset disable register optional Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Extract disable and mask code into separate functions Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Implement a way to invert mask reg value Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Add support for WDT counter enable register Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Cleanup PMU related code Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-23 16:06 ` Guenter Roeck 2021-11-23 16:06 ` Guenter Roeck 2021-11-23 16:17 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-23 16:17 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-23 22:33 ` Guenter Roeck 2021-11-23 22:33 ` Guenter Roeck 2021-11-23 23:30 ` Sam Protsenko [this message] 2021-11-23 23:30 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-27 22:52 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-27 22:52 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-28 17:56 ` Guenter Roeck 2021-11-28 17:56 ` Guenter Roeck 2021-11-28 19:18 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-28 19:18 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Remove superfluous err label Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] watchdog: s3c2410: Add Exynos850 support Sam Protsenko 2021-11-21 16:56 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-22 15:14 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-22 15:14 ` Sam Protsenko 2021-11-23 16:12 ` Guenter Roeck 2021-11-23 16:12 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAPLW+4kmUqg=2vYOiWfMhQFqFw1sh0Eo6Yqv8nPEbV_0MObn5A@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.