All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] libnvdimm/namespace: Enforce memremap_compat_align()
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:43:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hQouRNBcJ4uZ2mysr_aKstLhvUf66gRQ_3QoQNyOy72g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49k14q5ezs.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 1:55 PM Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
>
> > The pmem driver on PowerPC crashes with the following signature when
> > instantiating misaligned namespaces that map their capacity via
> > memremap_pages().
> >
> >     BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access at 0xc001000406000000
> >     Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000090790
> >     NIP [c000000000090790] arch_add_memory+0xc0/0x130
> >     LR [c000000000090744] arch_add_memory+0x74/0x130
> >     Call Trace:
> >      arch_add_memory+0x74/0x130 (unreliable)
> >      memremap_pages+0x74c/0xa30
> >      devm_memremap_pages+0x3c/0xa0
> >      pmem_attach_disk+0x188/0x770
> >      nvdimm_bus_probe+0xd8/0x470
> >
> > With the assumption that only memremap_pages() has alignment
> > constraints, enforce memremap_compat_align() for
> > pmem_should_map_pages(), nd_pfn, or nd_dax cases.
> >
> > Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/158041477336.3889308.4581652885008605170.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c |   10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> > index 032dc61725ff..aff1f32fdb4f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> > @@ -1739,6 +1739,16 @@ struct nd_namespace_common *nvdimm_namespace_common_probe(struct device *dev)
> >               return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> >       }
> >
> > +     if (pmem_should_map_pages(dev) || nd_pfn || nd_dax) {
> > +             struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
> > +             resource_size_t start = nsio->res.start;
> > +
> > +             if (!IS_ALIGNED(start | size, memremap_compat_align())) {
> > +                     dev_dbg(&ndns->dev, "misaligned, unable to map\n");
> > +                     return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +
> >       if (is_namespace_pmem(&ndns->dev)) {
> >               struct nd_namespace_pmem *nspm;
> >
>
> Actually, I take back my ack.  :) This prevents a previously working
> namespace from being successfully probed/setup.

Do you have a test case handy? I can see a potential gap with a
namespace that used internal padding to fix up the alignment. The goal
of this check is to catch cases that are just going to fail
devm_memremap_pages(), and the expectation is that it could not have
worked before unless it was ported from another platform, or someone
flipped the page-size switch on PowerPC.

> I thought we were only
> going to enforce the alignment for a newly created namespace?  This should
> only check whether the alignment works for the current platform.

The model is a new default 16MB alignment is enforced at creation
time, but if you need to support previously created namespaces then
you can manually trim that alignment requirement to no less than
memremap_compat_align() because that's the point at which
devm_memremap_pages() will start failing or crashing.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] libnvdimm/namespace: Enforce memremap_compat_align()
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:43:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hQouRNBcJ4uZ2mysr_aKstLhvUf66gRQ_3QoQNyOy72g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49k14q5ezs.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 1:55 PM Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
>
> > The pmem driver on PowerPC crashes with the following signature when
> > instantiating misaligned namespaces that map their capacity via
> > memremap_pages().
> >
> >     BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access at 0xc001000406000000
> >     Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000090790
> >     NIP [c000000000090790] arch_add_memory+0xc0/0x130
> >     LR [c000000000090744] arch_add_memory+0x74/0x130
> >     Call Trace:
> >      arch_add_memory+0x74/0x130 (unreliable)
> >      memremap_pages+0x74c/0xa30
> >      devm_memremap_pages+0x3c/0xa0
> >      pmem_attach_disk+0x188/0x770
> >      nvdimm_bus_probe+0xd8/0x470
> >
> > With the assumption that only memremap_pages() has alignment
> > constraints, enforce memremap_compat_align() for
> > pmem_should_map_pages(), nd_pfn, or nd_dax cases.
> >
> > Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/158041477336.3889308.4581652885008605170.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c |   10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> > index 032dc61725ff..aff1f32fdb4f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> > @@ -1739,6 +1739,16 @@ struct nd_namespace_common *nvdimm_namespace_common_probe(struct device *dev)
> >               return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> >       }
> >
> > +     if (pmem_should_map_pages(dev) || nd_pfn || nd_dax) {
> > +             struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
> > +             resource_size_t start = nsio->res.start;
> > +
> > +             if (!IS_ALIGNED(start | size, memremap_compat_align())) {
> > +                     dev_dbg(&ndns->dev, "misaligned, unable to map\n");
> > +                     return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +
> >       if (is_namespace_pmem(&ndns->dev)) {
> >               struct nd_namespace_pmem *nspm;
> >
>
> Actually, I take back my ack.  :) This prevents a previously working
> namespace from being successfully probed/setup.

Do you have a test case handy? I can see a potential gap with a
namespace that used internal padding to fix up the alignment. The goal
of this check is to catch cases that are just going to fail
devm_memremap_pages(), and the expectation is that it could not have
worked before unless it was ported from another platform, or someone
flipped the page-size switch on PowerPC.

> I thought we were only
> going to enforce the alignment for a newly created namespace?  This should
> only check whether the alignment works for the current platform.

The model is a new default 16MB alignment is enforced at creation
time, but if you need to support previously created namespaces then
you can manually trim that alignment requirement to no less than
memremap_compat_align() because that's the point at which
devm_memremap_pages() will start failing or crashing.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] libnvdimm/namespace: Enforce memremap_compat_align()
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:43:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hQouRNBcJ4uZ2mysr_aKstLhvUf66gRQ_3QoQNyOy72g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49k14q5ezs.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 1:55 PM Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
>
> > The pmem driver on PowerPC crashes with the following signature when
> > instantiating misaligned namespaces that map their capacity via
> > memremap_pages().
> >
> >     BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access at 0xc001000406000000
> >     Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000090790
> >     NIP [c000000000090790] arch_add_memory+0xc0/0x130
> >     LR [c000000000090744] arch_add_memory+0x74/0x130
> >     Call Trace:
> >      arch_add_memory+0x74/0x130 (unreliable)
> >      memremap_pages+0x74c/0xa30
> >      devm_memremap_pages+0x3c/0xa0
> >      pmem_attach_disk+0x188/0x770
> >      nvdimm_bus_probe+0xd8/0x470
> >
> > With the assumption that only memremap_pages() has alignment
> > constraints, enforce memremap_compat_align() for
> > pmem_should_map_pages(), nd_pfn, or nd_dax cases.
> >
> > Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/158041477336.3889308.4581652885008605170.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c |   10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> > index 032dc61725ff..aff1f32fdb4f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> > @@ -1739,6 +1739,16 @@ struct nd_namespace_common *nvdimm_namespace_common_probe(struct device *dev)
> >               return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> >       }
> >
> > +     if (pmem_should_map_pages(dev) || nd_pfn || nd_dax) {
> > +             struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
> > +             resource_size_t start = nsio->res.start;
> > +
> > +             if (!IS_ALIGNED(start | size, memremap_compat_align())) {
> > +                     dev_dbg(&ndns->dev, "misaligned, unable to map\n");
> > +                     return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +
> >       if (is_namespace_pmem(&ndns->dev)) {
> >               struct nd_namespace_pmem *nspm;
> >
>
> Actually, I take back my ack.  :) This prevents a previously working
> namespace from being successfully probed/setup.

Do you have a test case handy? I can see a potential gap with a
namespace that used internal padding to fix up the alignment. The goal
of this check is to catch cases that are just going to fail
devm_memremap_pages(), and the expectation is that it could not have
worked before unless it was ported from another platform, or someone
flipped the page-size switch on PowerPC.

> I thought we were only
> going to enforce the alignment for a newly created namespace?  This should
> only check whether the alignment works for the current platform.

The model is a new default 16MB alignment is enforced at creation
time, but if you need to support previously created namespaces then
you can manually trim that alignment requirement to no less than
memremap_compat_align() because that's the point at which
devm_memremap_pages() will start failing or crashing.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-13 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-13  0:48 [PATCH v2 0/4] libnvdimm: Cross-arch compatible namespace alignment Dan Williams
2020-02-13  0:48 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13  0:48 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13  0:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/memremap_pages: Introduce memremap_compat_align() Dan Williams
2020-02-13  0:48   ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13  0:48   ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 16:57   ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13 16:57     ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13 16:57     ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13 18:26     ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 18:26       ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 18:26       ` Dan Williams
2020-02-14  3:26       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-02-14  3:26         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-02-14  3:26         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-02-14 20:59       ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 20:59         ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 20:59         ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 23:05         ` Dan Williams
2020-02-14 23:05           ` Dan Williams
2020-02-14 23:05           ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13  0:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] libnvdimm/namespace: Enforce memremap_compat_align() Dan Williams
2020-02-13  0:48   ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13  0:48   ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 19:16   ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13 19:16     ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13 19:16     ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13 21:55   ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13 21:55     ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13 21:55     ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13 22:43     ` Dan Williams [this message]
2020-02-13 22:43       ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 22:43       ` Dan Williams
2020-02-14 16:44       ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 16:44         ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 16:44         ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 16:55         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-02-14 16:55           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-02-14 16:55           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-02-13  0:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] libnvdimm/region: Introduce NDD_LABELING Dan Williams
2020-02-13  0:48   ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13  0:48   ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 19:12   ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13 19:12     ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13 19:12     ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13  0:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] libnvdimm/region: Introduce an 'align' attribute Dan Williams
2020-02-13  0:48   ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13  0:48   ` Dan Williams
2020-02-14 20:19   ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 20:19     ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 20:19     ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] libnvdimm: Cross-arch compatible namespace alignment Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 21:03   ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 21:03   ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4hQouRNBcJ4uZ2mysr_aKstLhvUf66gRQ_3QoQNyOy72g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.