All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	naresh.kamboju@linaro.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] RISC-V: make TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_SPEC_20191213 gas only
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:32:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/jmm0Q7ypzkUaXw@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230223220546.52879-3-conor@kernel.org>

Hi Conor,

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:05:46PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> Quoting the llvm docs:
> > Between versions 2.0 and 2.1 of the base I specification, a backwards
> > incompatible change was made to remove selected instructions and CSRs
> > from the base ISA. These instructions were grouped into a set of new
> > extensions, but were no longer required by the base ISA. (snip) LLVM
> > currently implements version 2.0 of the base specification. Thus,
> > instructions from these extensions are accepted as part of the base
> > ISA.
> 
> There is therefore no need (at present!) to carry out a $cc-option
> check, and instead just gate presence of zicsr and zifencei in march
> on the version of binutils that commit 6df2a016c0c8 ("riscv: fix build
> with binutils 2.38") highlights as the introduction of the requirement.
> 
> In fact, the status quo creates some issues with mixed llvm/binutils
> builds, specifically building with llvm-17 and ld from binutils-2.35.
> Odd combo you may think, but this is what tuxsuite's debian stable uses
> while testing 5.10 stable kernels as doesn't support LLD.
> 
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # needs RISC-V: move zicsr/zifencei spec version check to Kconfi

I think it would be better to drop this comment and just mark patch 1
for stable directly. However, if it remains, 'Kconfi' -> 'Kconfig' :)

> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYt9T=ELCLaB9byxaLW2Qf4pZcDO=huCA0D8ug2V2+irJQ@mail.gmail.com/
> Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>

Thanks for helping getting down to the bottom of this!

> ---
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 4eb0ef8314b3..c6902f4c5650 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -291,8 +291,7 @@ endchoice
>  config TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_SPEC_20191213
>  	bool
>  	default y
> -	depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zicsr_zifencei)
> -	depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zicsr_zifencei)
> +	depends on AS_IS_GNU && AS_VERSION >= 23800
>  	help
>  	  Newer binutils versions default to ISA spec version 20191213 which
>  	  moves some instructions from the I extension to the Zicsr and Zifencei
> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	naresh.kamboju@linaro.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] RISC-V: make TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_SPEC_20191213 gas only
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:32:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/jmm0Q7ypzkUaXw@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230223220546.52879-3-conor@kernel.org>

Hi Conor,

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:05:46PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> Quoting the llvm docs:
> > Between versions 2.0 and 2.1 of the base I specification, a backwards
> > incompatible change was made to remove selected instructions and CSRs
> > from the base ISA. These instructions were grouped into a set of new
> > extensions, but were no longer required by the base ISA. (snip) LLVM
> > currently implements version 2.0 of the base specification. Thus,
> > instructions from these extensions are accepted as part of the base
> > ISA.
> 
> There is therefore no need (at present!) to carry out a $cc-option
> check, and instead just gate presence of zicsr and zifencei in march
> on the version of binutils that commit 6df2a016c0c8 ("riscv: fix build
> with binutils 2.38") highlights as the introduction of the requirement.
> 
> In fact, the status quo creates some issues with mixed llvm/binutils
> builds, specifically building with llvm-17 and ld from binutils-2.35.
> Odd combo you may think, but this is what tuxsuite's debian stable uses
> while testing 5.10 stable kernels as doesn't support LLD.
> 
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # needs RISC-V: move zicsr/zifencei spec version check to Kconfi

I think it would be better to drop this comment and just mark patch 1
for stable directly. However, if it remains, 'Kconfi' -> 'Kconfig' :)

> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYt9T=ELCLaB9byxaLW2Qf4pZcDO=huCA0D8ug2V2+irJQ@mail.gmail.com/
> Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>

Thanks for helping getting down to the bottom of this!

> ---
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 4eb0ef8314b3..c6902f4c5650 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -291,8 +291,7 @@ endchoice
>  config TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_SPEC_20191213
>  	bool
>  	default y
> -	depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zicsr_zifencei)
> -	depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zicsr_zifencei)
> +	depends on AS_IS_GNU && AS_VERSION >= 23800
>  	help
>  	  Newer binutils versions default to ISA spec version 20191213 which
>  	  moves some instructions from the I extension to the Zicsr and Zifencei
> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-24 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-23 22:05 [PATCH v1 0/2] RISC-V: avoid build issues for clang/llvm-17 with binutils 2.35 Conor Dooley
2023-02-23 22:05 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-23 22:05 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] RISC-V: move zicsr/zifencei spec version check to Kconfig Conor Dooley
2023-02-23 22:05   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-24 16:37   ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-02-24 16:37     ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-02-24 17:00     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-24 17:00       ` Conor Dooley
2023-03-06 23:52       ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-03-06 23:52         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-03-07 19:14         ` Conor Dooley
2023-03-07 19:14           ` Conor Dooley
2023-03-07 19:24           ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-03-07 19:24             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-23 22:05 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] RISC-V: make TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_SPEC_20191213 gas only Conor Dooley
2023-02-23 22:05   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-24 16:32   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2023-02-24 16:32     ` Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y/jmm0Q7ypzkUaXw@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.