All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, Matteo.Carlini@arm.com,
	Valentin.Schneider@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, Eric Mackay <eric.mackay@oracle.com>,
	dave.kleikamp@oracle.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:55:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfCXJRJSMK4tt_Cm@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf1757ca-6d41-87e7-53dd-56146eef5693@linux.com>

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 10:06:06AM -0700, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> 
> > This could be an issue in the ARM64 arch code itself where there maybe
> > an assumption elsewhere that a cpumask can always store up to NR_CPU
> > cpus and not only nr_cpu_ids as OFFSTACK does.
> > 
> > How can I exercise the opp driver in order to recreate the problem?
> > 
> > I assume the opp driver is ARM specific? x86 defaults to OFFSTACK so if
> > there is an issue with OFFSTACK in opp then it should fail with kernel
> > default configuration on that platform.
> 
> I checked the ARM64 arch sources use of NR_CPUS and its all fine.
> 
> Also verified in my testing logs that CONFIG_PM_OPP was set in all tests.
> 
> No warnings in the kernel log during those tests.
> 
> How to reproduce this?

I guess you need a platform with a dts that has an "operating-points-v2"
property. I don't have any around.

Sudeep was trying to trigger this code path earlier, not sure where he
got to.

-- 
Catalin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, Matteo.Carlini@arm.com,
	Valentin.Schneider@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, Eric Mackay <eric.mackay@oracle.com>,
	dave.kleikamp@oracle.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:55:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfCXJRJSMK4tt_Cm@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf1757ca-6d41-87e7-53dd-56146eef5693@linux.com>

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 10:06:06AM -0700, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> 
> > This could be an issue in the ARM64 arch code itself where there maybe
> > an assumption elsewhere that a cpumask can always store up to NR_CPU
> > cpus and not only nr_cpu_ids as OFFSTACK does.
> > 
> > How can I exercise the opp driver in order to recreate the problem?
> > 
> > I assume the opp driver is ARM specific? x86 defaults to OFFSTACK so if
> > there is an issue with OFFSTACK in opp then it should fail with kernel
> > default configuration on that platform.
> 
> I checked the ARM64 arch sources use of NR_CPUS and its all fine.
> 
> Also verified in my testing logs that CONFIG_PM_OPP was set in all tests.
> 
> No warnings in the kernel log during those tests.
> 
> How to reproduce this?

I guess you need a platform with a dts that has an "operating-points-v2"
property. I don't have any around.

Sudeep was trying to trigger this code path earlier, not sure where he
got to.

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-12 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-07  1:45 [PATCH v3] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512 Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-07  1:45 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-07 17:49 ` Mark Rutland
2024-03-07 17:49   ` Mark Rutland
2024-03-07 19:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-07 19:07   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-18 18:17   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-18 18:17     ` Catalin Marinas
     [not found] ` <CGME20240308140130eucas1p1259c805a0b6491ce2f69c6fca0264b1f@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2024-03-08 14:01   ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-08 14:01     ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-08 14:51     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-08 14:51       ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-08 16:21       ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-08 16:21         ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-08 17:08         ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-08 17:08           ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-11 12:12           ` Mark Rutland
2024-03-11 12:12             ` Mark Rutland
2024-03-11 14:56             ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-11 14:56               ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-11 15:22               ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-11 15:22                 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-11 16:51                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-11 16:51                   ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-11 17:08                   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-11 17:08                     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-11 18:55     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-11 18:55       ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-11 21:07       ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-11 21:07         ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-12 17:06         ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-12 17:06           ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-12 17:55           ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2024-03-12 17:55             ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-13 14:35             ` Sudeep Holla
2024-03-13 14:35               ` Sudeep Holla
2024-03-13 16:22               ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-13 16:22                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-13 16:39                 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-13 16:39                   ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-13 20:18                   ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-13 20:18                     ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-13 17:13                 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-13 17:13                   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-14  8:39                   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-14  8:39                     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-14 12:28                     ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-14 12:28                       ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-14 13:17                       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-14 13:17                         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-14 17:01                         ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-14 17:01                           ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-14 13:57                       ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-14 13:57                         ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZfCXJRJSMK4tt_Cm@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Matteo.Carlini@arm.com \
    --cc=Valentin.Schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dave.kleikamp@oracle.com \
    --cc=eric.mackay@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.