All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, Matteo.Carlini@arm.com,
	Valentin.Schneider@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, Eric Mackay <eric.mackay@oracle.com>,
	dave.kleikamp@oracle.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:18:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8533ce6-8771-400c-93b6-829a51c38b74@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <173078dd-3743-2d39-a9ea-015ea5be48f8@linux.com>

On 13.03.2024 17:39, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>
>>> I did try to trigger this on FVP by adding OPPs + some hacks to add 
>>> dummy
>>> clock provider to successfully probe this driver. I couldn't hit the 
>>> issue
>>> reported 🙁. It could be that with the hardware clock/regulator 
>>> drivers, it
>>> take a different path in OPP core.
>>
>> I can fully reproduce this issue on Khadas VIM3 and Odroid-N2 boards.
>> Both Meson A311D SoC based.
>
> Hmm... Would it trigger on Orangepi5plus? With some effort I can get 
> that board up at home.
>
> Could you reboot with some memory diagnostics so that we are sure that 
> nothing gets corrupted?
>
> F.e. specify a command line parameter "slub_debug" to enable 
> redzoning. That way we may see potential memory corruption.

I've added CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y to my .config, but I got no reports 
for any potential memory corruption.


Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, Matteo.Carlini@arm.com,
	Valentin.Schneider@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, Eric Mackay <eric.mackay@oracle.com>,
	dave.kleikamp@oracle.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:18:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8533ce6-8771-400c-93b6-829a51c38b74@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <173078dd-3743-2d39-a9ea-015ea5be48f8@linux.com>

On 13.03.2024 17:39, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>
>>> I did try to trigger this on FVP by adding OPPs + some hacks to add 
>>> dummy
>>> clock provider to successfully probe this driver. I couldn't hit the 
>>> issue
>>> reported 🙁. It could be that with the hardware clock/regulator 
>>> drivers, it
>>> take a different path in OPP core.
>>
>> I can fully reproduce this issue on Khadas VIM3 and Odroid-N2 boards.
>> Both Meson A311D SoC based.
>
> Hmm... Would it trigger on Orangepi5plus? With some effort I can get 
> that board up at home.
>
> Could you reboot with some memory diagnostics so that we are sure that 
> nothing gets corrupted?
>
> F.e. specify a command line parameter "slub_debug" to enable 
> redzoning. That way we may see potential memory corruption.

I've added CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y to my .config, but I got no reports 
for any potential memory corruption.


Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-13 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-07  1:45 [PATCH v3] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512 Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-07  1:45 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-07 17:49 ` Mark Rutland
2024-03-07 17:49   ` Mark Rutland
2024-03-07 19:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-07 19:07   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-18 18:17   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-18 18:17     ` Catalin Marinas
     [not found] ` <CGME20240308140130eucas1p1259c805a0b6491ce2f69c6fca0264b1f@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2024-03-08 14:01   ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-08 14:01     ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-08 14:51     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-08 14:51       ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-08 16:21       ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-08 16:21         ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-08 17:08         ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-08 17:08           ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-11 12:12           ` Mark Rutland
2024-03-11 12:12             ` Mark Rutland
2024-03-11 14:56             ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-11 14:56               ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-11 15:22               ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-11 15:22                 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-11 16:51                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-11 16:51                   ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-11 17:08                   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-11 17:08                     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-11 18:55     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-11 18:55       ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-11 21:07       ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-11 21:07         ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-12 17:06         ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-12 17:06           ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-12 17:55           ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-12 17:55             ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-13 14:35             ` Sudeep Holla
2024-03-13 14:35               ` Sudeep Holla
2024-03-13 16:22               ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-13 16:22                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-13 16:39                 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-13 16:39                   ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-13 20:18                   ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2024-03-13 20:18                     ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-13 17:13                 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-13 17:13                   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-14  8:39                   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-14  8:39                     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-14 12:28                     ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-14 12:28                       ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-03-14 13:17                       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-14 13:17                         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-14 17:01                         ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-14 17:01                           ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-03-14 13:57                       ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-14 13:57                         ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e8533ce6-8771-400c-93b6-829a51c38b74@samsung.com \
    --to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Matteo.Carlini@arm.com \
    --cc=Valentin.Schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dave.kleikamp@oracle.com \
    --cc=eric.mackay@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.