All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 7012/7430] include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_183' declared with attribute error: unexpected size in kmalloc_index()
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:59:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab90e117-6457-bf01-fdce-9682e972ed27@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=+i9Snmu7ML3Zqrbii1-jtS0BF_KeGEhn-R49Z2bh=uW-rGg@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/11/21 1:56 PM, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021, 7:27 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz
> <mailto:vbabka@suse.cz>> wrote:
>     I meant the the condition to use BUILD_BUG_ON instead of BUG_ON would include
>     !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES)
> 
> 
> You mean this? (This will make kmalloc_index return -1 without BUG())
> 
> if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) || CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION >= 110000) &&
> size_is_constant)
>         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES), "unexpected
> size in kmalloc_index()");
> else
>         BUG();

No,

> Or This?
> 
> if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) || CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION >= 110000) &&
> size_is_constant && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES))
>         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(1, "unexpected size in kmalloc_index()");
> else
>         BUG();
> 
> Maybe this version seems better

Yeah, meant that.

> But little bit worried :(
> The code is getting too complicated...
> How do you think?

Yeah, I expected that problems like this could occur as we're poking at some
rare corner cases of compiler implementations here. But if that leads to fixes
in compilers, good for everyone I'd say.

So I would try this, even if it becomes complicated.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 7012/7430] include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_183' declared with attribute error: unexpected size in kmalloc_index()
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:59:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab90e117-6457-bf01-fdce-9682e972ed27@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=+i9Snmu7ML3Zqrbii1-jtS0BF_KeGEhn-R49Z2bh=uW-rGg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1281 bytes --]

On 6/11/21 1:56 PM, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021, 7:27 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz
> <mailto:vbabka@suse.cz>> wrote:
>     I meant the the condition to use BUILD_BUG_ON instead of BUG_ON would include
>     !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES)
> 
> 
> You mean this? (This will make kmalloc_index return -1 without BUG())
> 
> if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) || CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION >= 110000) &&
> size_is_constant)
>         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES), "unexpected
> size in kmalloc_index()");
> else
>         BUG();

No,

> Or This?
> 
> if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) || CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION >= 110000) &&
> size_is_constant && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES))
>         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(1, "unexpected size in kmalloc_index()");
> else
>         BUG();
> 
> Maybe this version seems better

Yeah, meant that.

> But little bit worried :(
> The code is getting too complicated...
> How do you think?

Yeah, I expected that problems like this could occur as we're poking at some
rare corner cases of compiler implementations here. But if that leads to fixes
in compilers, good for everyone I'd say.

So I would try this, even if it becomes complicated.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-11 23:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-05  6:10 [linux-next:master 7012/7430] include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_183' declared with attribute error: unexpected size in kmalloc_index() kernel test robot
2021-06-05  6:10 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-06 11:08 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-06 11:08   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-07 11:40   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-07 11:40     ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-07 12:25     ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-07 12:25       ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-07 15:27       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-07 15:27         ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-07 15:49         ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-07 15:49           ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-08  7:57           ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-08  7:57             ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-08 17:05             ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-08 17:05               ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-08 17:27               ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-08 17:27                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-08 18:45                 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-08 18:45                   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-08 18:50                   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-08 18:50                     ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-10  5:17                   ` Some logical errors on my words, but I still wonder Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-10  5:17                     ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-10 11:43                   ` [linux-next:master 7012/7430] include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_183' declared with attribute error: unexpected size in kmalloc_index() Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-10 11:43                     ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-11  8:58                     ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-11 10:27                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-11 11:56                         ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-11 23:59                           ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-06-11 23:59                             ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-12  0:19                             ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-12  0:19                               ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-14  9:26                               ` [PATCH FIX -next] " Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-14  9:26                                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-11 16:56                       ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-06-11 16:56                         ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-06-12  0:31                         ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-06-12  0:31                           ` Hyeonggon Yoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ab90e117-6457-bf01-fdce-9682e972ed27@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.