All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
To: "'Kukjin Kim'" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	kyungmin.park@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lrg@slimlogic.co.uk, "'Changhwan Youn'" <chaos.youn@samsung.com>,
	"'MyungJoo Ham'" <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	"'Mark Brown'" <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] regulators: add support max8952 regulator
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:58:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <006201cb5ee3$0100fc20$0302f460$%kim@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 

Kukjin Kim wrote:
> 
> Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >
> > Do you check the DVS feature?
> > It can support the DVS by GPIOs and platform can set the each voltages
at
> > each mode.
> >
> Ok...I agree about the feature's necessity that you said.
> 
> However, we don't need separate driver which has same/similar
functionality.
> So...would be better that could implement it in max8649...
> 
> Could you please do it based on this?...in fact, can't test it on SMDK.
> 
Hmm...
Kyungmin, if you have no time to do it, my team will do it.

Is it ok?

> Thanks.
> 
> Best regards,
> Kgene.
> --
> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> 
> > As quick review of max8649. It can't support it.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Kyungmin Park
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kukjin Kim [mailto:kgene.kim@samsung.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:26 AM
> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: lrg@slimlogic.co.uk; Changhwan Youn; Kukjin Kim; MyungJoo Ham;
> Kyungmin
> > Park
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] regulators: add support max8952 regulator
> >
> > From: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn@samsung.com>
> >
> > The operation of max8952 is almost similar to max8649 except the output
> > voltage range. This patch adds support the max8952 regulator using
> > current max8649 implementation. And removes separate max8952.[ch] files
> > since the functionality is now merged into this driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> > Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > ---
> > Following is as per Mark Brown's suggestion.
> > Changes since v2:
> > - Removed separate max8952.[ch] files
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Added returning fail when detected wrong ID
> > - Added matching the ID from the chip in case the user got things wrong
> > - Added enum chip ID instead of 0, 1
> >
> (snip)


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] regulators: add support max8952 regulator
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:58:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <006201cb5ee3$0100fc20$0302f460$%kim@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01a401cb4f01$73d60ac0$5b822040$%park@samsung.com

Kukjin Kim wrote:
> 
> Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >
> > Do you check the DVS feature?
> > It can support the DVS by GPIOs and platform can set the each voltages
at
> > each mode.
> >
> Ok...I agree about the feature's necessity that you said.
> 
> However, we don't need separate driver which has same/similar
functionality.
> So...would be better that could implement it in max8649...
> 
> Could you please do it based on this?...in fact, can't test it on SMDK.
> 
Hmm...
Kyungmin, if you have no time to do it, my team will do it.

Is it ok?

> Thanks.
> 
> Best regards,
> Kgene.
> --
> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> 
> > As quick review of max8649. It can't support it.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Kyungmin Park
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kukjin Kim [mailto:kgene.kim at samsung.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:26 AM
> > To: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> > linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: lrg at slimlogic.co.uk; Changhwan Youn; Kukjin Kim; MyungJoo Ham;
> Kyungmin
> > Park
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] regulators: add support max8952 regulator
> >
> > From: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn@samsung.com>
> >
> > The operation of max8952 is almost similar to max8649 except the output
> > voltage range. This patch adds support the max8952 regulator using
> > current max8649 implementation. And removes separate max8952.[ch] files
> > since the functionality is now merged into this driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> > Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > ---
> > Following is as per Mark Brown's suggestion.
> > Changes since v2:
> > - Removed separate max8952.[ch] files
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Added returning fail when detected wrong ID
> > - Added matching the ID from the chip in case the user got things wrong
> > - Added enum chip ID instead of 0, 1
> >
> (snip)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-28  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-07 23:26 [PATCH v3] regulators: add support max8952 regulator Kukjin Kim
2010-09-07 23:26 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-09-08  2:56 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-09-08  2:56   ` Kyungmin Park
2010-09-08 12:28   ` Kukjin Kim
2010-09-08 12:28     ` Kukjin Kim
2010-09-28  7:58   ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2010-09-28  7:58     ` Kukjin Kim
2010-09-28  8:03     ` Kyungmin Park
2010-09-28  8:03       ` Kyungmin Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='006201cb5ee3$0100fc20$0302f460$%kim@samsung.com' \
    --to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=chaos.youn@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.