All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
To: <mhocko@kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: "'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"'Linus Torvalds'" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"'Mel Gorman'" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"'Johannes Weiner'" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"'Rik van Riel'" <riel@redhat.com>,
	"'David Rientjes'" <rientjes@google.com>,
	"'Tetsuo Handa'" <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'Michal Hocko'" <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] mm, oom: refactor oom detection
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:10:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00f201d112c8$e2377720$a6a66560$@alibaba-inc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446131835-3263-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>

> +/*
> + * Number of backoff steps for potentially reclaimable pages if the direct reclaim
> + * cannot make any progress. Each step will reduce 1/MAX_STALL_BACKOFF of the
> + * reclaimable memory.
> + */
> +#define MAX_STALL_BACKOFF 16
> +
>  static inline struct page *
>  __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  						struct alloc_context *ac)
> @@ -2984,6 +2991,9 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  	enum migrate_mode migration_mode = MIGRATE_ASYNC;
>  	bool deferred_compaction = false;
>  	int contended_compaction = COMPACT_CONTENDED_NONE;
> +	struct zone *zone;
> +	struct zoneref *z;
> +	int stall_backoff = 0;
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * In the slowpath, we sanity check order to avoid ever trying to
> @@ -3135,13 +3145,56 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
>  		goto noretry;
> 
> -	/* Keep reclaiming pages as long as there is reasonable progress */
> +	/*
> +	 * Do not retry high order allocations unless they are __GFP_REPEAT
> +	 * and even then do not retry endlessly.
> +	 */
>  	pages_reclaimed += did_some_progress;
> -	if ((did_some_progress && order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) ||
> -	    ((gfp_mask & __GFP_REPEAT) && pages_reclaimed < (1 << order))) {
> -		/* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */
> -		wait_iff_congested(ac->preferred_zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
> -		goto retry;
> +	if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) {
> +		if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_REPEAT) || pages_reclaimed >= (1<<order))
> +			goto noretry;
> +
> +		if (did_some_progress)
> +			goto retry;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Be optimistic and consider all pages on reclaimable LRUs as usable
> +	 * but make sure we converge to OOM if we cannot make any progress after
> +	 * multiple consecutive failed attempts.
> +	 */
> +	if (did_some_progress)
> +		stall_backoff = 0;
> +	else
> +		stall_backoff = min(stall_backoff+1, MAX_STALL_BACKOFF);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere.
> +	 * If none of the target zones can satisfy our allocation request even
> +	 * if all reclaimable pages are considered then we are screwed and have
> +	 * to go OOM.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) {
> +		unsigned long free = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
> +		unsigned long reclaimable;
> +		unsigned long target;
> +
> +		reclaimable = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) +
> +			      zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE) +
> +			      zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
> +		target = reclaimable;
> +		target -= stall_backoff * (1 + target/MAX_STALL_BACKOFF);

		target = reclaimable - stall_backoff * (1 + target/MAX_STALL_BACKOFF);
		             = reclaimable - stall_backoff - stall_backoff  * (target/MAX_STALL_BACKOFF);

then the first stall_backoff looks unreasonable.
I guess you mean
		target	= reclaimable - target * (stall_backoff/MAX_STALL_BACKOFF);
			= reclaimable - stall_back * (target/MAX_STALL_BACKOFF);

> +		target += free;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole target?
> +		 */
> +		if (__zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, min_wmark_pages(zone),
> +				ac->high_zoneidx, alloc_flags, target)) {
> +			/* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */
> +			wait_iff_congested(zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
> +			goto retry;
> +		}
>  	}
> 
[...]
/*
> @@ -2734,10 +2730,6 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
>  		goto retry;
>  	}
> 
> -	/* Any of the zones still reclaimable?  Don't OOM. */
> -	if (zones_reclaimable)
> -		return 1;
> -

Looks cleanup of zones_reclaimable left.
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> --
> 2.6.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
To: mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: 'Andrew Morton' <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	'Mel Gorman' <mgorman@suse.de>,
	'Johannes Weiner' <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	'Rik van Riel' <riel@redhat.com>,
	'David Rientjes' <rientjes@google.com>,
	'Tetsuo Handa' <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	'LKML' <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	'Michal Hocko' <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] mm, oom: refactor oom detection
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:10:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00f201d112c8$e2377720$a6a66560$@alibaba-inc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446131835-3263-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>

> +/*
> + * Number of backoff steps for potentially reclaimable pages if the direct reclaim
> + * cannot make any progress. Each step will reduce 1/MAX_STALL_BACKOFF of the
> + * reclaimable memory.
> + */
> +#define MAX_STALL_BACKOFF 16
> +
>  static inline struct page *
>  __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  						struct alloc_context *ac)
> @@ -2984,6 +2991,9 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  	enum migrate_mode migration_mode = MIGRATE_ASYNC;
>  	bool deferred_compaction = false;
>  	int contended_compaction = COMPACT_CONTENDED_NONE;
> +	struct zone *zone;
> +	struct zoneref *z;
> +	int stall_backoff = 0;
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * In the slowpath, we sanity check order to avoid ever trying to
> @@ -3135,13 +3145,56 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
>  		goto noretry;
> 
> -	/* Keep reclaiming pages as long as there is reasonable progress */
> +	/*
> +	 * Do not retry high order allocations unless they are __GFP_REPEAT
> +	 * and even then do not retry endlessly.
> +	 */
>  	pages_reclaimed += did_some_progress;
> -	if ((did_some_progress && order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) ||
> -	    ((gfp_mask & __GFP_REPEAT) && pages_reclaimed < (1 << order))) {
> -		/* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */
> -		wait_iff_congested(ac->preferred_zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
> -		goto retry;
> +	if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) {
> +		if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_REPEAT) || pages_reclaimed >= (1<<order))
> +			goto noretry;
> +
> +		if (did_some_progress)
> +			goto retry;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Be optimistic and consider all pages on reclaimable LRUs as usable
> +	 * but make sure we converge to OOM if we cannot make any progress after
> +	 * multiple consecutive failed attempts.
> +	 */
> +	if (did_some_progress)
> +		stall_backoff = 0;
> +	else
> +		stall_backoff = min(stall_backoff+1, MAX_STALL_BACKOFF);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere.
> +	 * If none of the target zones can satisfy our allocation request even
> +	 * if all reclaimable pages are considered then we are screwed and have
> +	 * to go OOM.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) {
> +		unsigned long free = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
> +		unsigned long reclaimable;
> +		unsigned long target;
> +
> +		reclaimable = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) +
> +			      zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE) +
> +			      zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
> +		target = reclaimable;
> +		target -= stall_backoff * (1 + target/MAX_STALL_BACKOFF);

		target = reclaimable - stall_backoff * (1 + target/MAX_STALL_BACKOFF);
		             = reclaimable - stall_backoff - stall_backoff  * (target/MAX_STALL_BACKOFF);

then the first stall_backoff looks unreasonable.
I guess you mean
		target	= reclaimable - target * (stall_backoff/MAX_STALL_BACKOFF);
			= reclaimable - stall_back * (target/MAX_STALL_BACKOFF);

> +		target += free;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole target?
> +		 */
> +		if (__zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, min_wmark_pages(zone),
> +				ac->high_zoneidx, alloc_flags, target)) {
> +			/* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */
> +			wait_iff_congested(zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
> +			goto retry;
> +		}
>  	}
> 
[...]
/*
> @@ -2734,10 +2730,6 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
>  		goto retry;
>  	}
> 
> -	/* Any of the zones still reclaimable?  Don't OOM. */
> -	if (zones_reclaimable)
> -		return 1;
> -

Looks cleanup of zones_reclaimable left.
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> --
> 2.6.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-30  4:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-29 15:17 RFC: OOM detection rework v1 mhocko
2015-10-29 15:17 ` mhocko
2015-10-29 15:17 ` [RFC 1/3] mm, oom: refactor oom detection mhocko
2015-10-29 15:17   ` mhocko
2015-10-30  4:10   ` Hillf Danton [this message]
2015-10-30  4:10     ` Hillf Danton
2015-10-30  8:36     ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-30  8:36       ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-30 10:14       ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-30 10:14         ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-30 13:32         ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-30 13:32           ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-30 14:55           ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-30 14:55             ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-31  3:57         ` Hillf Danton
2015-10-31  3:57           ` Hillf Danton
2015-10-30  5:23   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-10-30  5:23     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-10-30  8:23     ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-30  8:23       ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-30  9:41       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-10-30  9:41         ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-10-30 10:18         ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-30 10:18           ` Michal Hocko
2015-11-12 12:39   ` Michal Hocko
2015-11-12 12:39     ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-29 15:17 ` [RFC 2/3] mm: throttle on IO only when there are too many dirty and writeback pages mhocko
2015-10-29 15:17   ` mhocko
2015-10-30  4:18   ` Hillf Danton
2015-10-30  4:18     ` Hillf Danton
2015-10-30  8:37     ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-30  8:37       ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-30  5:48   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-10-30  5:48     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-10-30  8:38     ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-30  8:38       ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-29 15:17 ` [RFC 3/3] mm: use watermak checks for __GFP_REPEAT high order allocations mhocko
2015-10-29 15:17   ` mhocko
2015-11-12 12:44 ` RFC: OOM detection rework v1 Michal Hocko
2015-11-12 12:44   ` Michal Hocko
2015-11-18 13:03 [RFC 0/3] OOM detection rework v2 Michal Hocko
2015-11-18 13:03 ` [RFC 1/3] mm, oom: refactor oom detection Michal Hocko
2015-11-19 23:01   ` David Rientjes
2015-11-20  9:06     ` Michal Hocko
2015-11-20 23:27       ` David Rientjes
2015-11-23  9:41         ` Michal Hocko
2015-11-23 18:24           ` Johannes Weiner
2015-11-24 10:03             ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-01 12:56 [RFC 0/3] OOM detection rework v3 Michal Hocko
2015-12-01 12:56 ` [RFC 1/3] mm, oom: refactor oom detection Michal Hocko
2015-12-11 16:16   ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-14 18:34     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00f201d112c8$e2377720$a6a66560$@alibaba-inc.com' \
    --to=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.