All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM Mailing List <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-S390 Mailing List <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:09:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <035b4bd3-5856-e8e5-91bf-ba0b5c7c3736@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190603133745.240c00a7.cohuck@redhat.com>



On 03.06.19 13:37, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2019 14:26:51 +0200
> Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> To support protected virtualization cio will need to make sure the
>> memory used for communication with the hypervisor is DMA memory.
>>
>> Let us introduce one global pool for cio.
>>
>> Our DMA pools are implemented as a gen_pool backed with DMA pages. The
>> idea is to avoid each allocation effectively wasting a page, as we
>> typically allocate much less than PAGE_SIZE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/s390/Kconfig           |   1 +
>>   arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h |  11 ++++
>>   drivers/s390/cio/css.c      | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   3 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> (...)
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h
>> index 1727180e8ca1..43c007d2775a 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h
>> @@ -328,6 +328,17 @@ static inline u8 pathmask_to_pos(u8 mask)
>>   void channel_subsystem_reinit(void);
>>   extern void css_schedule_reprobe(void);
>>   
>> +extern void *cio_dma_zalloc(size_t size);
>> +extern void cio_dma_free(void *cpu_addr, size_t size);
>> +extern struct device *cio_get_dma_css_dev(void);
>> +
>> +struct gen_pool;
> 
> That forward declaration is a bit ugly... I guess the alternative was
> include hell?

That's an easy one.

  #include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/genalloc.h>
  #include <asm/types.h>

> 
>> +void *cio_gp_dma_zalloc(struct gen_pool *gp_dma, struct device *dma_dev,
>> +			size_t size);
>> +void cio_gp_dma_free(struct gen_pool *gp_dma, void *cpu_addr, size_t size);
>> +void cio_gp_dma_destroy(struct gen_pool *gp_dma, struct device *dma_dev);
>> +struct gen_pool *cio_gp_dma_create(struct device *dma_dev, int nr_pages);
>> +
>>   /* Function from drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c */
>>   int chsc_sstpc(void *page, unsigned int op, u16 ctrl, u64 *clock_delta);
>>   int chsc_sstpi(void *page, void *result, size_t size);
>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/css.c b/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
>> index aea502922646..b97618497848 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
>> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>>   #include <linux/reboot.h>
>>   #include <linux/suspend.h>
>>   #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
>> +#include <linux/genalloc.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>>   #include <asm/isc.h>
>>   #include <asm/crw.h>
>>   
>> @@ -224,6 +226,8 @@ struct subchannel *css_alloc_subchannel(struct subchannel_id schid,
>>   	INIT_WORK(&sch->todo_work, css_sch_todo);
>>   	sch->dev.release = &css_subchannel_release;
>>   	device_initialize(&sch->dev);
> 
> It might be helpful to add a comment why you use 31 bit here...

@Halil, please let me know what comment you prefere here...

> 
>> +	sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31);
>> +	sch->dev.dma_mask = &sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
>>   	return sch;
>>   
>>   err:
>> @@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
>>   	dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
>>   	css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
>>   	css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
> 
> ...and 64 bit here.

and here.

> 
>> +	css->device.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
>> +	css->device.dma_mask = &css->device.coherent_dma_mask;
>>   
>>   	mutex_init(&css->mutex);
>>   	css->cssid = chsc_get_cssid(nr);
> 
> (...)
> 
>> @@ -1059,16 +1168,19 @@ static int __init css_bus_init(void)
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		goto out_unregister;
>>   	ret = register_pm_notifier(&css_power_notifier);
>> -	if (ret) {
>> -		unregister_reboot_notifier(&css_reboot_notifier);
>> -		goto out_unregister;
>> -	}
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out_unregister_rn;
>> +	ret = cio_dma_pool_init();
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out_unregister_rn;
> 
> Don't you also need to unregister the pm notifier on failure here?

Mmh, that was the original intention. Thanks!

> 
> Other than that, I noticed only cosmetic issues; seems reasonable to me.
> 
>>   	css_init_done = 1;
>>   
>>   	/* Enable default isc for I/O subchannels. */
>>   	isc_register(IO_SCH_ISC);
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>> +out_unregister_rn:
>> +	unregister_reboot_notifier(&css_reboot_notifier);
>>   out_unregister:
>>   	while (i-- > 0) {
>>   		struct channel_subsystem *css = channel_subsystems[i];
> 

Thanks,
Michael

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Linux-S390 Mailing List <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	KVM Mailing List <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
	Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:09:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <035b4bd3-5856-e8e5-91bf-ba0b5c7c3736@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190603133745.240c00a7.cohuck@redhat.com>



On 03.06.19 13:37, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2019 14:26:51 +0200
> Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> To support protected virtualization cio will need to make sure the
>> memory used for communication with the hypervisor is DMA memory.
>>
>> Let us introduce one global pool for cio.
>>
>> Our DMA pools are implemented as a gen_pool backed with DMA pages. The
>> idea is to avoid each allocation effectively wasting a page, as we
>> typically allocate much less than PAGE_SIZE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/s390/Kconfig           |   1 +
>>   arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h |  11 ++++
>>   drivers/s390/cio/css.c      | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   3 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> (...)
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h
>> index 1727180e8ca1..43c007d2775a 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h
>> @@ -328,6 +328,17 @@ static inline u8 pathmask_to_pos(u8 mask)
>>   void channel_subsystem_reinit(void);
>>   extern void css_schedule_reprobe(void);
>>   
>> +extern void *cio_dma_zalloc(size_t size);
>> +extern void cio_dma_free(void *cpu_addr, size_t size);
>> +extern struct device *cio_get_dma_css_dev(void);
>> +
>> +struct gen_pool;
> 
> That forward declaration is a bit ugly... I guess the alternative was
> include hell?

That's an easy one.

  #include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/genalloc.h>
  #include <asm/types.h>

> 
>> +void *cio_gp_dma_zalloc(struct gen_pool *gp_dma, struct device *dma_dev,
>> +			size_t size);
>> +void cio_gp_dma_free(struct gen_pool *gp_dma, void *cpu_addr, size_t size);
>> +void cio_gp_dma_destroy(struct gen_pool *gp_dma, struct device *dma_dev);
>> +struct gen_pool *cio_gp_dma_create(struct device *dma_dev, int nr_pages);
>> +
>>   /* Function from drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c */
>>   int chsc_sstpc(void *page, unsigned int op, u16 ctrl, u64 *clock_delta);
>>   int chsc_sstpi(void *page, void *result, size_t size);
>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/css.c b/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
>> index aea502922646..b97618497848 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
>> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>>   #include <linux/reboot.h>
>>   #include <linux/suspend.h>
>>   #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
>> +#include <linux/genalloc.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>>   #include <asm/isc.h>
>>   #include <asm/crw.h>
>>   
>> @@ -224,6 +226,8 @@ struct subchannel *css_alloc_subchannel(struct subchannel_id schid,
>>   	INIT_WORK(&sch->todo_work, css_sch_todo);
>>   	sch->dev.release = &css_subchannel_release;
>>   	device_initialize(&sch->dev);
> 
> It might be helpful to add a comment why you use 31 bit here...

@Halil, please let me know what comment you prefere here...

> 
>> +	sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31);
>> +	sch->dev.dma_mask = &sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
>>   	return sch;
>>   
>>   err:
>> @@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
>>   	dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
>>   	css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
>>   	css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
> 
> ...and 64 bit here.

and here.

> 
>> +	css->device.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
>> +	css->device.dma_mask = &css->device.coherent_dma_mask;
>>   
>>   	mutex_init(&css->mutex);
>>   	css->cssid = chsc_get_cssid(nr);
> 
> (...)
> 
>> @@ -1059,16 +1168,19 @@ static int __init css_bus_init(void)
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		goto out_unregister;
>>   	ret = register_pm_notifier(&css_power_notifier);
>> -	if (ret) {
>> -		unregister_reboot_notifier(&css_reboot_notifier);
>> -		goto out_unregister;
>> -	}
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out_unregister_rn;
>> +	ret = cio_dma_pool_init();
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out_unregister_rn;
> 
> Don't you also need to unregister the pm notifier on failure here?

Mmh, that was the original intention. Thanks!

> 
> Other than that, I noticed only cosmetic issues; seems reasonable to me.
> 
>>   	css_init_done = 1;
>>   
>>   	/* Enable default isc for I/O subchannels. */
>>   	isc_register(IO_SCH_ISC);
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>> +out_unregister_rn:
>> +	unregister_reboot_notifier(&css_reboot_notifier);
>>   out_unregister:
>>   	while (i-- > 0) {
>>   		struct channel_subsystem *css = channel_subsystems[i];
> 

Thanks,
Michael

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-03 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-29 12:26 [PATCH v3 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization Michael Mueller
2019-05-29 12:26 ` Michael Mueller
2019-05-29 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] s390/mm: force swiotlb for " Michael Mueller
2019-05-29 12:26   ` Michael Mueller
2019-05-29 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio Michael Mueller
2019-05-29 12:26   ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03 11:37   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 11:37     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 12:09     ` Michael Mueller [this message]
2019-06-03 12:09       ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03 12:57       ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-03 12:57         ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-03 13:34         ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 13:34           ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 13:43           ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03 13:43             ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03 14:04       ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-03 14:04         ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-03 14:22         ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-03 14:22           ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-03 12:47     ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-03 12:47       ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-03 13:40       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 13:40         ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-29 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support Michael Mueller
2019-05-29 12:26   ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03 12:06   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 12:06     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 12:45     ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03 12:45       ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03 13:42       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 13:42         ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 13:52         ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03 13:52           ` Michael Mueller
2019-05-29 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] s390/airq: use DMA memory for adapter interrupts Michael Mueller
2019-05-29 12:26   ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03 15:27   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 15:27     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-04 13:22     ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-04 13:22       ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-04 14:51       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-04 14:51         ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-04 15:06         ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-04 15:06           ` Halil Pasic
2019-05-29 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] virtio/s390: use cacheline aligned airq bit vectors Michael Mueller
2019-05-29 12:26   ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03  9:10   ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-06-03  9:10     ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-06-03 15:40   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 15:40     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-29 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] virtio/s390: add indirection to indicators access Michael Mueller
2019-05-29 12:26   ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03 15:55   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 15:55     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 17:55     ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-03 17:55       ` Halil Pasic
2019-05-29 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] virtio/s390: use DMA memory for ccw I/O and classic notifiers Michael Mueller
2019-05-29 12:26   ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03 16:17   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 16:17     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-04 13:08     ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-04 13:08       ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-04 13:36       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-04 13:36         ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-04 14:29         ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-04 14:29           ` Halil Pasic
2019-05-29 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] virtio/s390: make airq summary indicators DMA Michael Mueller
2019-05-29 12:26   ` Michael Mueller
2019-06-03 16:03   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 16:03     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 17:54     ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-03 17:54       ` Halil Pasic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=035b4bd3-5856-e8e5-91bf-ba0b5c7c3736@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sebott@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.