All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] drm/edid: split out invalid block filtering to a separate function
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 21:42:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <04d5ad0bbb43267f32312bccbab8a1f4c80565a1.1648578814.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1648578814.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

It's such a special case there's no point in keeping it inline in the
happy day scenario, confusing matters.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index a1be5c3a80e5..dee95332d7e1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -1821,6 +1821,33 @@ bool drm_edid_is_valid(struct edid *edid)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_edid_is_valid);
 
+static struct edid *edid_filter_invalid_blocks(const struct edid *edid,
+					       int valid_extensions)
+{
+	struct edid *new, *base;
+	int i;
+
+	new = kmalloc_array(valid_extensions + 1, EDID_LENGTH, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!new)
+		goto out;
+
+	base = new;
+	for (i = 0; i <= edid->extensions; i++) {
+		const void *block = edid + i;
+
+		if (edid_block_valid(block, i == 0))
+			memcpy(base++, block, EDID_LENGTH);
+	}
+
+	new->checksum += new->extensions - valid_extensions;
+	new->extensions = valid_extensions;
+
+out:
+	kfree(edid);
+
+	return new;
+}
+
 #define DDC_SEGMENT_ADDR 0x30
 /**
  * drm_do_probe_ddc_edid() - get EDID information via I2C
@@ -2070,32 +2097,9 @@ struct edid *drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
 	}
 
 	if (valid_extensions != edid->extensions) {
-		struct edid *base;
-		int i;
-
 		connector_bad_edid(connector, (u8 *)edid, edid->extensions + 1);
 
-		edid->checksum += edid->extensions - valid_extensions;
-		edid->extensions = valid_extensions;
-
-		new = kmalloc_array(valid_extensions + 1, EDID_LENGTH,
-				    GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!new)
-			goto out;
-
-		base = new;
-		for (i = 0; i <= edid->extensions; i++) {
-			void *block = edid + i;
-
-			if (!edid_block_valid(block, i == 0))
-				continue;
-
-			memcpy(base, block, EDID_LENGTH);
-			base++;
-		}
-
-		kfree(edid);
-		edid = new;
+		edid = edid_filter_invalid_blocks(edid, valid_extensions);
 	}
 
 	return edid;
-- 
2.30.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] drm/edid: split out invalid block filtering to a separate function
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 21:42:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <04d5ad0bbb43267f32312bccbab8a1f4c80565a1.1648578814.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1648578814.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

It's such a special case there's no point in keeping it inline in the
happy day scenario, confusing matters.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index a1be5c3a80e5..dee95332d7e1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -1821,6 +1821,33 @@ bool drm_edid_is_valid(struct edid *edid)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_edid_is_valid);
 
+static struct edid *edid_filter_invalid_blocks(const struct edid *edid,
+					       int valid_extensions)
+{
+	struct edid *new, *base;
+	int i;
+
+	new = kmalloc_array(valid_extensions + 1, EDID_LENGTH, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!new)
+		goto out;
+
+	base = new;
+	for (i = 0; i <= edid->extensions; i++) {
+		const void *block = edid + i;
+
+		if (edid_block_valid(block, i == 0))
+			memcpy(base++, block, EDID_LENGTH);
+	}
+
+	new->checksum += new->extensions - valid_extensions;
+	new->extensions = valid_extensions;
+
+out:
+	kfree(edid);
+
+	return new;
+}
+
 #define DDC_SEGMENT_ADDR 0x30
 /**
  * drm_do_probe_ddc_edid() - get EDID information via I2C
@@ -2070,32 +2097,9 @@ struct edid *drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
 	}
 
 	if (valid_extensions != edid->extensions) {
-		struct edid *base;
-		int i;
-
 		connector_bad_edid(connector, (u8 *)edid, edid->extensions + 1);
 
-		edid->checksum += edid->extensions - valid_extensions;
-		edid->extensions = valid_extensions;
-
-		new = kmalloc_array(valid_extensions + 1, EDID_LENGTH,
-				    GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!new)
-			goto out;
-
-		base = new;
-		for (i = 0; i <= edid->extensions; i++) {
-			void *block = edid + i;
-
-			if (!edid_block_valid(block, i == 0))
-				continue;
-
-			memcpy(base, block, EDID_LENGTH);
-			base++;
-		}
-
-		kfree(edid);
-		edid = new;
+		edid = edid_filter_invalid_blocks(edid, valid_extensions);
 	}
 
 	return edid;
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-29 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-29 18:42 [PATCH 00/12] drm/edid: cleanup and refactoring around validity checks Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/edid: use struct edid * in drm_do_get_edid() Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-30 13:05   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-30 13:05     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-30 15:16     ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-30 15:16       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-30 15:39       ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-30 15:39         ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-30 16:28         ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-30 16:28           ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-30 16:50           ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-30 16:50             ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-30 17:09             ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-30 21:01       ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-30 21:01         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-31 18:46     ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-31 18:46       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/edid: clean up EDID block checksum functions Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/edid: add edid_block_tag() helper to get the EDID extension tag Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/edid: make drm_edid_header_is_valid() accept void pointer Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/edid: clean up edid_is_zero() Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/edid: split out edid_header_fix() Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/edid: split drm_edid_block_valid() to check and act parts Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-31 14:54   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-31 14:54     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-31 15:54     ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-31 15:54       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-31 16:49     ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-31 16:49       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-31 16:58       ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-31 16:58         ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-29 18:42 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/edid: use a better variable name for EDID block read retries Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-31 14:55   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-31 14:55     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-29 18:42 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/edid: simplify block check when filtering invalid blocks Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-03-29 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] drm/edid: split out invalid block filtering to a separate function Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/edid: track invalid blocks in drm_do_get_edid() Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/edid: reduce magic when updating the EDID block checksum Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-31 14:59   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-31 14:59     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-29 19:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/edid: cleanup and refactoring around validity checks Patchwork
2022-03-29 19:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-03-29 20:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-29 21:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-03-31 17:07 ` [PATCH 00/12] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-31 17:07   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=04d5ad0bbb43267f32312bccbab8a1f4c80565a1.1648578814.git.jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.