All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* should a layer supply its own "local.conf" file?
@ 2021-06-23 10:48 Robert P. J. Day
  2021-06-23 15:41 ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2021-06-23 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: OE Core mailing list


  long story short -- was having trouble figuring out why basic
settings i was adding to my build directory's conf/local.conf were
being ignored, and traced it back to the internal layer i was using
having its own "local.conf" file (in its conf directory, sitting
quietly next to the layer's "layer.conf" file).

  argh.

  i'm assuming that it was *that* local.conf that was being consulted
by the config process (overriding mine). is there some rationale for
that? that doesn't strike me as proper design, but i'm willing to be
educated.

rday

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-23 15:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-23 10:48 should a layer supply its own "local.conf" file? Robert P. J. Day
2021-06-23 15:41 ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.