From: "Norman Diamond" <ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp>
To: "Andries Brouwer" <aebr@win.tue.nl>
Cc: "Vojtech Pavlik" <vojtech@suse.cz>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"John Bradford" <john@grabjohn.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:21:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c2001c38104$34c2a690$44ee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030921171632.A11359@pclin040.win.tue.nl
Andries Brouwer:
> Norman Diamond:
> > Vojtech Pavlik:
> >
> > > If anyone would send me samples of Japanese keyboards, you can be sure
> > > I'd test them.
> >
> > Thank you! I was afraid to ask in advance because I thought that you would
> > either refuse or you would ignore the suggestion. Dr. Brouwer did refuse,
> > about 3 years ago or so.
>
> Did I really?
You did on 2001.2.23:
> > would have a use for a Japanese USB keyboard
>
> It would be too expensive to mail.
> Instead of keyboards I prefer to collect scancodes of keyboards,
> and you provided some good information.
> (I also got photographs from someone, maybe you saw:
> http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/linux/kbd/scancodes-3.html )
Returning to this year:
> I think no kernel changes are required to use Japanese keyboards today.
> (But kbd has to be recompiled with NR_KEYS set to 256.)
I'm not convinced yet. defkeymap.c_shipped is included in the downloadable
.bz2 file and it is inadequate.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-22 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-14 3:51 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 10:20 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-14 11:14 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [1] Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 11:15 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [2] Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 11:21 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [3] Norman Diamond
2003-09-16 13:43 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-17 12:35 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2003-09-17 17:22 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-18 16:15 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2003-09-21 11:06 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 12:39 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 12:48 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 14:49 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 17:07 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 17:42 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 17:52 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-22 12:22 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-24 10:02 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <fa.gddv2je.1jk671u@ifi.uio.no>
2003-09-16 18:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2003-09-21 11:01 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 13:26 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-21 15:16 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-22 12:21 ` Norman Diamond [this message]
2003-09-22 20:14 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-23 11:44 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-23 17:22 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-10-15 10:22 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-21 16:00 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 12:00 John Bradford
2003-09-21 12:45 ` Andries Brouwer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='0c2001c38104$34c2a690$44ee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60' \
--to=ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.