From: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
To: Norman Diamond <ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp>
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:16:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030921171632.A11359@pclin040.win.tue.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a5f01c38043$f9c35c80$44ee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60>; from ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:26:04PM +0900
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:26:04PM +0900, Norman Diamond wrote:
[good description of Japanese keyboards deleted]
> > If anyone would send me samples of Japanese keyboards, you can be sure
> > I'd test them.
>
> Thank you! I was afraid to ask in advance because I thought that you would
> either refuse or you would ignore the suggestion. Dr. Brouwer did refuse,
> about 3 years ago or so.
Did I really?
But the advantage of a good description is that the information
lives on the net and can be retrieved by anybody. A piece of
hardware takes room and can be tested by only one.
I think no kernel changes are required to use Japanese keyboards today.
(But kbd has to be recompiled with NR_KEYS set to 256.)
Andries
On http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/linux/kbd/scancodes-6.html
there is a reasonably detailed description of the state of
affairs. Maybe nothing more is needed. Of course additions
and corrections are welcome.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-21 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-14 3:51 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 10:20 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-14 11:14 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [1] Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 11:15 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [2] Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 11:21 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [3] Norman Diamond
2003-09-16 13:43 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-17 12:35 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2003-09-17 17:22 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-18 16:15 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2003-09-21 11:06 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 12:39 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 12:48 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 14:49 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 17:07 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 17:42 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 17:52 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-22 12:22 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-24 10:02 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <fa.gddv2je.1jk671u@ifi.uio.no>
2003-09-16 18:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2003-09-21 11:01 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 13:26 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-21 15:16 ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
2003-09-22 12:21 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-22 20:14 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-23 11:44 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-23 17:22 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-10-15 10:22 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-21 16:00 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 12:00 John Bradford
2003-09-21 12:45 ` Andries Brouwer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030921171632.A11359@pclin040.win.tue.nl \
--to=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.