[dunfell/master PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[dunfell/master PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[praneeth]

From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>

Update to the latest commit of ti-u-boot-2021.01

Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
---
 recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
index 437f6eba..4c3f0a47 100644
--- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
+++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ require u-boot-ti.inc
 
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Licenses/README;md5=5a7450c57ffe5ae63fd732446b988025"
 
-PR = "r6"
+PR = "r7"
 
 BRANCH = "ti-u-boot-2021.01"
 
-SRCREV = "a6e78929575b6969c15ced9685441fc430ee9510"
+SRCREV = "c66dd9b8467472278803c2426098a2828c93ebcc"
-- 
2.17.1

[dunfell/master PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA

[praneeth]

From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>

Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA

Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
---
 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb | 2 +-
 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb    | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
index 4654d92d..834df5ff 100644
--- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
@@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-5.10:"
 
 BRANCH = "ti-rt-linux-5.10.y"
 
-SRCREV = "afe9ba17bb94cd226f9e5dc3685e4fe32be28c5c"
+SRCREV = "433ef931c699f08bef8c67de8458302c5f971c8b"
 PV = "5.10.35+git${SRCPV}"
diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
index 72a6c49c..47f1669e 100644
--- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
 
 BRANCH = "ti-linux-5.10.y"
 
-SRCREV = "72d727fe733f2610e937a063bcebedce329948ec"
+SRCREV = "ae876c7c91df646ab198331e676f250f06cfdeb5"
 PV = "5.10.35+git${SRCPV}"
 
 # Append to the MACHINE_KERNEL_PR so that a new SRCREV will cause a rebuild
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA

[Lukas Wunner]

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 07:02:52PM -0500, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
> index 4654d92d..834df5ff 100644
> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
> @@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-5.10:"
>  
>  BRANCH = "ti-rt-linux-5.10.y"
>  
> -SRCREV = "afe9ba17bb94cd226f9e5dc3685e4fe32be28c5c"
> +SRCREV = "433ef931c699f08bef8c67de8458302c5f971c8b"
>  PV = "5.10.35+git${SRCPV}"
> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
> index 72a6c49c..47f1669e 100644
> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
>  
>  BRANCH = "ti-linux-5.10.y"
>  
> -SRCREV = "72d727fe733f2610e937a063bcebedce329948ec"
> +SRCREV = "ae876c7c91df646ab198331e676f250f06cfdeb5"
>  PV = "5.10.35+git${SRCPV}"
>  
>  # Append to the MACHINE_KERNEL_PR so that a new SRCREV will cause a rebuild

This doesn't apply cleanly to any of the dunfell, dunfell-next nor master
branches.  SRCREV is currently 8fbd16658d11 and d85aee3e19aa, respectively
on those branches.

Which branch did you base this patch on?

Thanks,

Lukas

Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA

[praneeth]

On 6/8/21 9:04 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 07:02:52PM -0500, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
>> index 4654d92d..834df5ff 100644
>> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
>> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
>> @@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-5.10:"
>>   
>>   BRANCH = "ti-rt-linux-5.10.y"
>>   
>> -SRCREV = "afe9ba17bb94cd226f9e5dc3685e4fe32be28c5c"
>> +SRCREV = "433ef931c699f08bef8c67de8458302c5f971c8b"
>>   PV = "5.10.35+git${SRCPV}"
>> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
>> index 72a6c49c..47f1669e 100644
>> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
>> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
>>   
>>   BRANCH = "ti-linux-5.10.y"
>>   
>> -SRCREV = "72d727fe733f2610e937a063bcebedce329948ec"
>> +SRCREV = "ae876c7c91df646ab198331e676f250f06cfdeb5"
>>   PV = "5.10.35+git${SRCPV}"
>>   
>>   # Append to the MACHINE_KERNEL_PR so that a new SRCREV will cause a rebuild
> 
> This doesn't apply cleanly to any of the dunfell, dunfell-next nor master
> branches.  SRCREV is currently 8fbd16658d11 and d85aee3e19aa, respectively
> on those branches.
> 
> Which branch did you base this patch on?

The patch was made based on dunfell-next.
The conflict is seen because dunfell-next is not in sync with dunfell yet.
Once the following patches are pulled to dunfell branch, the patch can 
be applied cleanly. I am sending a v2 shortly.

Ref:
2de2c5ec linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA
6983b50e linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to 5.10.35

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lukas
> 

Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA

[Lukas Wunner]

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 07:40:07PM -0500, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> On 6/8/21 9:04 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > This doesn't apply cleanly to any of the dunfell, dunfell-next nor master
> > branches.  SRCREV is currently 8fbd16658d11 and d85aee3e19aa, respectively
> > on those branches.
> > 
> > Which branch did you base this patch on?
> 
> The patch was made based on dunfell-next.
> The conflict is seen because dunfell-next is not in sync with dunfell yet.
> Once the following patches are pulled to dunfell branch, the patch can be
> applied cleanly. I am sending a v2 shortly.
> 
> Ref:
> 2de2c5ec linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA
> 6983b50e linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to 5.10.35

It looks like dunfell-next wasn't pushed to git.ti.com, hence when I
fetched yesterday afternoon, the above-quoted commits were missing on
the branch:

$ cat .git/logs/refs/remotes/origin/dunfell-next
542456ca082de7133a61be21222d13974a87e41d f0abcc93b2bd272f2fc3a6ecc13f44f9658e1217 Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> 1620636780 +0200	pull --rebase: fast-forward
f0abcc93b2bd272f2fc3a6ecc13f44f9658e1217 99cf543ee385677589edc6bd132068c5a710803f Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> 1623076459 +0200	pull --rebase: fast-forward

$ date -j -f%s 1623076459
Mo  7 Jun 2021 16:34:19 CEST

But in the meantime the branch was pushed, so I've now
fetched the missing commits.

Thanks!

Lukas

[dunfell/master PATCH] conf: am65xx-evm: ReIntroduce display overlays for 5.10

[praneeth]

From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>

commit 9ea50db095f9 ("conf: am65xx-evm: Remove non-existent dtb* from 5.10")
removed all non-existent dtb* for j7-evm as they were not
available on linux 5.10 branch at that time.

This patch reintroduces following display overlays.
- k3-am654-evm-tc358876.dtbo
- k3-am654-evm-oldi-lcd1evm.dtbo

Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
---
 conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc b/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc
index 7cc3ddcc..8516ca4c 100644
--- a/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc
+++ b/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ KERNEL_DEVICETREE = " \
     ti/k3-am654-sr1.dtbo \
     ti/k3-am654-pcie-usb2.dtbo \
     ti/k3-am654-pcie-usb3.dtbo \
+    ti/k3-am654-evm-tc358876.dtbo \
+    ti/k3-am654-evm-oldi-lcd1evm.dtbo \
 "
 
 BBMULTICONFIG += "k3r5-sr2"
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [dunfell/master PATCH] conf: am65xx-evm: ReIntroduce display overlays for 5.10

[praneeth]

On 6/7/2021 7:02 PM, praneeth@ti.com wrote:
> From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
> 
> commit 9ea50db095f9 ("conf: am65xx-evm: Remove non-existent dtb* from 5.10")
> removed all non-existent dtb* for j7-evm as they were not
> available on linux 5.10 branch at that time.

Will send a V2, this commit message is not accurate.


> 
> This patch reintroduces following display overlays.
> - k3-am654-evm-tc358876.dtbo
> - k3-am654-evm-oldi-lcd1evm.dtbo
> 
> Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
> ---
>   conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc b/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc
> index 7cc3ddcc..8516ca4c 100644
> --- a/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc
> +++ b/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ KERNEL_DEVICETREE = " \
>       ti/k3-am654-sr1.dtbo \
>       ti/k3-am654-pcie-usb2.dtbo \
>       ti/k3-am654-pcie-usb3.dtbo \
> +    ti/k3-am654-evm-tc358876.dtbo \
> +    ti/k3-am654-evm-oldi-lcd1evm.dtbo \
>   "
>   
>   BBMULTICONFIG += "k3r5-sr2"
> 

[dunfell/master PATCH] conf/machine: am64xx: Add overlay to support icssg1-dualemac

[praneeth]

From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>

This patch adds overlay to support icssg1-dualemac
ie: 1 x CPSW3g ports and 2 x ICSSG1 ports configuration

overlay: k3-am642-evm-icssg1-dualemac.dtbo

Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
---
 conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc b/conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc
index a46a50ed..95fdc79d 100644
--- a/conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc
+++ b/conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ SERIAL_CONSOLES_CHECK = "${SERIAL_CONSOLES}"
 KERNEL_DEVICETREE = " \
     ti/k3-am642-evm.dtb \
     ti/k3-am642-sk.dtb \
+    ti/k3-am642-evm-icssg1-dualemac.dtbo \
 "
 
 # AM64 supports multi-certificate images, use the same
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

Series looks good to me, including v2. Maybe better to specify sequence number 
[PATCH 01/04] to keep the order?

Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@konsulko.com>


On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 07:02:51PM -0500, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
> 
> Update to the latest commit of ti-u-boot-2021.01
> 
> Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
> ---
>  recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
> index 437f6eba..4c3f0a47 100644
> --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
> +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ require u-boot-ti.inc
>  
>  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Licenses/README;md5=5a7450c57ffe5ae63fd732446b988025"
>  
> -PR = "r6"
> +PR = "r7"
>  
>  BRANCH = "ti-u-boot-2021.01"
>  
> -SRCREV = "a6e78929575b6969c15ced9685441fc430ee9510"
> +SRCREV = "c66dd9b8467472278803c2426098a2828c93ebcc"
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Regards,
Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964
Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186  6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964

Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[praneeth]

On 6/7/21 7:30 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> Series looks good to me, including v2. Maybe better to specify sequence number
> [PATCH 01/04] to keep the order?

Thanks for the feedback.

Will do, Will send a updated version for the kernel and overlay patches 
today once the kernel tree gets updated.

The uboot patch can go independently.

> 
> Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@konsulko.com>
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 07:02:51PM -0500, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>> From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
>>
>> Update to the latest commit of ti-u-boot-2021.01
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
>> index 437f6eba..4c3f0a47 100644
>> --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
>> +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
>> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ require u-boot-ti.inc
>>   
>>   LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Licenses/README;md5=5a7450c57ffe5ae63fd732446b988025"
>>   
>> -PR = "r6"
>> +PR = "r7"
>>   
>>   BRANCH = "ti-u-boot-2021.01"
>>   
>> -SRCREV = "a6e78929575b6969c15ced9685441fc430ee9510"
>> +SRCREV = "c66dd9b8467472278803c2426098a2828c93ebcc"
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

[meta-ti][dunfell/master][PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[Sinthu Raja M]

From: Sinthu Raja <sinthu.raja@ti.com>

Update to the latest commit of ti-u-boot-2021.01

Signed-off-by: Sinthu Raja <sinthu.raja@ti.com>
---
 recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
index 53a95f201..6901dcb50 100644
--- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
+++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ require u-boot-ti.inc
 
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Licenses/README;md5=5a7450c57ffe5ae63fd732446b988025"
 
-PR = "r11"
+PR = "r12"
 
 BRANCH = "ti-u-boot-2021.01"
 
-SRCREV = "53e79d0e89f975eeb874366dd9a92f68b3a599d1"
+SRCREV = "d77252021a85c72d7ff9a4e151b81c4b4b9e1205"
-- 
2.31.1

Re: [meta-ti][dunfell/master][PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[Yogesh Siraswar]

On 8/30/2021 3:24 AM, Sinthu Raja wrote:
> From: Sinthu Raja <sinthu.raja@ti.com>
> 
> Update to the latest commit of ti-u-boot-2021.01
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sinthu Raja <sinthu.raja@ti.com>
> ---
>   recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
> index 53a95f201..6901dcb50 100644
> --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
> +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ require u-boot-ti.inc
>   
>   LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Licenses/README;md5=5a7450c57ffe5ae63fd732446b988025"
>   
> -PR = "r11"
> +PR = "r12"
>   
>   BRANCH = "ti-u-boot-2021.01"
>   
> -SRCREV = "53e79d0e89f975eeb874366dd9a92f68b3a599d1"
> +SRCREV = "d77252021a85c72d7ff9a4e151b81c4b4b9e1205"

NAK
We are not making any intermediate update to u-boot commit id.
All the commit ID are tied to core sdk releases.
If you want to use the latest or use the above commit ID please
use bleeding or bbappend respectively.

> 

[dunfell/master PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[praneeth]

From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>

Update to the latest commit of ti-u-boot-2021.01

Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
---
 recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
index 015cd028..b911042c 100644
--- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
+++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ require u-boot-ti.inc
 
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Licenses/README;md5=5a7450c57ffe5ae63fd732446b988025"
 
-PR = "r4"
+PR = "r5"
 
 BRANCH = "ti-u-boot-2021.01"
 
-SRCREV = "51a19c4274ca897cec279d1b2d883957ab4705c5"
+SRCREV = "fbbc964a3514d99430f66600603b7ae348b64cd4"
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[Nishanth Menon]

On 00:01-20210507, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
> 
> Update to the latest commit of ti-u-boot-2021.01
> 
> Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
> ---
>  recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
> index 015cd028..b911042c 100644
> --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
> +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ require u-boot-ti.inc
>  
>  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Licenses/README;md5=5a7450c57ffe5ae63fd732446b988025"
>  
> -PR = "r4"
> +PR = "r5"
>  
>  BRANCH = "ti-u-boot-2021.01"
>  
> -SRCREV = "51a19c4274ca897cec279d1b2d883957ab4705c5"
> +SRCREV = "fbbc964a3514d99430f66600603b7ae348b64cd4"
> -- 
> 2.17.1


Dont we need to fix up am64x- build?


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D

Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[Suman Anna]

On 5/14/21 2:23 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 00:01-20210507, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>> From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
>>
>> Update to the latest commit of ti-u-boot-2021.01
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
>> index 015cd028..b911042c 100644
>> --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
>> +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
>> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ require u-boot-ti.inc
>>  
>>  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Licenses/README;md5=5a7450c57ffe5ae63fd732446b988025"
>>  
>> -PR = "r4"
>> +PR = "r5"
>>  
>>  BRANCH = "ti-u-boot-2021.01"
>>  
>> -SRCREV = "51a19c4274ca897cec279d1b2d883957ab4705c5"
>> +SRCREV = "fbbc964a3514d99430f66600603b7ae348b64cd4"
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
> 
> 
> Dont we need to fix up am64x- build?
> 

Not for this commit SHA. The am64x config consolidation happened with the latest
commit a6e78929575b6969c15ced9685441fc430ee9510

regards
Suman