From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Rob Baxter <robb@synergymicro.com>
Cc: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>,
linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: multiple separate pci bridges ...
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 12:12:23 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1073092343.10538.21.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040103002733.GA2112@synergy>
> This was necessary because the PCI driver (scan/enumeration code) was using
> these same config calls that was being fixed up. (A chicken and egg issue?)
This should still not be necessary... Before scanning a bus, the PCI code
will properly set first_busno, thus the config access methods will work.
The only problem I spotted in 2.4 (and afaik, that is fixed in 2.6) is
that when P2P bridges are moved around, we could end up with a temporary
wrong state where 2 of these on a given bus segment would try to decode
the same bus numbers, thus screwing up probe. This is why I added a
skew value of 0x10 between each host on some machines.
Ben.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-03 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-01 18:11 multiple separate pci bridges Sven Luther
2004-01-02 4:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-02 7:40 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-02 7:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-04 21:03 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-04 21:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-04 22:06 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-05 16:40 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-05 21:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-05 21:42 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-05 22:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-06 7:39 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-06 8:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-06 8:11 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-06 14:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-01-06 14:45 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-06 15:33 ` Rob Baxter
2004-01-06 17:44 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-06 21:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-06 22:10 ` Marcus Barrow
2004-01-06 22:17 ` Rob Baxter
2004-01-06 22:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-07 2:35 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 2:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-07 2:40 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 9:02 ` Michael Schmitz
2004-01-07 9:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-07 9:56 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 10:27 ` Michael Schmitz
2004-01-13 9:56 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-13 10:26 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-18 12:15 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-18 13:00 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-18 13:14 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-19 9:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-18 22:27 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-18 22:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-19 9:21 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-18 23:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-05 21:38 ` Marcus Barrow
2004-01-06 7:14 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-06 7:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-06 8:20 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-02 18:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-01-02 15:18 ` Rob Baxter
2004-01-02 23:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-03 0:27 ` Rob Baxter
2004-01-03 1:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2004-01-05 0:52 ` Rob Baxter
2004-01-05 2:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-06 20:53 Marcus Barrow
2004-01-06 21:09 Marcus Barrow
2004-01-06 22:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-06 23:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-18 14:44 Sven Luther
2004-01-18 16:33 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-18 17:28 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-18 18:24 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-18 22:20 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-18 23:33 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-19 9:55 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-19 13:48 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-19 13:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-01-19 14:00 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-19 14:02 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-19 14:16 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-19 14:31 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-19 9:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-18 22:33 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-18 23:23 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-18 23:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-19 0:03 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-19 10:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-01-19 11:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-19 12:03 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-19 21:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-19 22:08 ` Sven Luther
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1073092343.10538.21.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=robb@synergymicro.com \
--cc=sven.luther@wanadoo.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.