All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, bzolnier@gmail.com, petko
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] block: hide request sector and data_len
Date: Mon,  4 May 2009 16:58:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1241423927-11871-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241423927-11871-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Block low level drivers for some reason have been pretty good at
abusing block layer API.  Especially struct request's fields tend to
get violated in all possible ways.  Make it clear that low level
drivers MUST NOT access or manipulate rq->sector and rq->data_len
directly by prefixing them with double underscores.

This change is also necessary to break build of out-of-tree codes
which assume the previous block API where internal fields can be
manipulated and rq->data_len carries residual count on completion.

[ Impact: hide internal fields, block API change ]

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 block/blk-core.c       |   20 ++++++++++----------
 block/blk-map.c        |    2 +-
 block/blk-merge.c      |    2 +-
 include/linux/blkdev.h |    9 +++++----
 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 3596ca7..6226a38 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ void blk_rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->timeout_list);
 	rq->cpu = -1;
 	rq->q = q;
-	rq->sector = (sector_t) -1;
+	rq->__sector = (sector_t) -1;
 	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&rq->hash);
 	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&rq->rb_node);
 	rq->cmd = rq->__cmd;
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio)
 		req->cmd_flags |= REQ_NOIDLE;
 
 	req->errors = 0;
-	req->sector = bio->bi_sector;
+	req->__sector = bio->bi_sector;
 	req->ioprio = bio_prio(bio);
 	blk_rq_bio_prep(req->q, req, bio);
 }
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 
 		req->biotail->bi_next = bio;
 		req->biotail = bio;
-		req->data_len += bytes;
+		req->__data_len += bytes;
 		req->ioprio = ioprio_best(req->ioprio, prio);
 		if (!blk_rq_cpu_valid(req))
 			req->cpu = bio->bi_comp_cpu;
@@ -1169,8 +1169,8 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 		 * not touch req->buffer either...
 		 */
 		req->buffer = bio_data(bio);
-		req->sector = bio->bi_sector;
-		req->data_len += bytes;
+		req->__sector = bio->bi_sector;
+		req->__data_len += bytes;
 		req->ioprio = ioprio_best(req->ioprio, prio);
 		if (!blk_rq_cpu_valid(req))
 			req->cpu = bio->bi_comp_cpu;
@@ -1878,7 +1878,7 @@ bool blk_update_request(struct request *req, int error, unsigned int nr_bytes)
 		 * can find how many bytes remain in the request
 		 * later.
 		 */
-		req->data_len = 0;
+		req->__data_len = 0;
 		return false;
 	}
 
@@ -1892,12 +1892,12 @@ bool blk_update_request(struct request *req, int error, unsigned int nr_bytes)
 		bio_iovec(bio)->bv_len -= nr_bytes;
 	}
 
-	req->data_len -= total_bytes;
+	req->__data_len -= total_bytes;
 	req->buffer = bio_data(req->bio);
 
 	/* update sector only for requests with clear definition of sector */
 	if (blk_fs_request(req) || blk_discard_rq(req))
-		req->sector += total_bytes >> 9;
+		req->__sector += total_bytes >> 9;
 
 	/*
 	 * If total number of sectors is less than the first segment
@@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@ bool blk_update_request(struct request *req, int error, unsigned int nr_bytes)
 	 */
 	if (blk_rq_bytes(req) < blk_rq_cur_bytes(req)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "blk: request botched\n");
-		req->data_len = blk_rq_cur_bytes(req);
+		req->__data_len = blk_rq_cur_bytes(req);
 	}
 
 	/* recalculate the number of segments */
@@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@ void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
 		rq->nr_phys_segments = bio_phys_segments(q, bio);
 		rq->buffer = bio_data(bio);
 	}
-	rq->data_len = bio->bi_size;
+	rq->__data_len = bio->bi_size;
 	rq->bio = rq->biotail = bio;
 
 	if (bio->bi_bdev)
diff --git a/block/blk-map.c b/block/blk-map.c
index 694fefa..56082be 100644
--- a/block/blk-map.c
+++ b/block/blk-map.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ int blk_rq_append_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
 		rq->biotail->bi_next = bio;
 		rq->biotail = bio;
 
-		rq->data_len += bio->bi_size;
+		rq->__data_len += bio->bi_size;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index b8df66a..4974dd5 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static int attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
 	req->biotail->bi_next = next->bio;
 	req->biotail = next->biotail;
 
-	req->data_len += blk_rq_bytes(next);
+	req->__data_len += blk_rq_bytes(next);
 
 	elv_merge_requests(q, req, next);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 723d22e..6617abd 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -166,8 +166,9 @@ struct request {
 	enum rq_cmd_type_bits cmd_type;
 	unsigned long atomic_flags;
 
-	sector_t sector;	/* sector cursor */
-	unsigned int data_len;	/* total data len, don't access directly */
+	/* the following two fields are internal, NEVER access directly */
+	sector_t __sector;		/* sector cursor */
+	unsigned int __data_len;	/* total data len */
 
 	struct bio *bio;
 	struct bio *biotail;
@@ -829,12 +830,12 @@ extern void blkdev_dequeue_request(struct request *req);
  */
 static inline sector_t blk_rq_pos(const struct request *rq)
 {
-	return rq->sector;
+	return rq->__sector;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int blk_rq_bytes(const struct request *rq)
 {
-	return rq->data_len;
+	return rq->__data_len;
 }
 
 static inline int blk_rq_cur_bytes(const struct request *rq)
-- 
1.6.0.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, bzolnier@gmail.com,
	petkovbb@googlemail.com, sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com,
	mike.miller@hp.com, Eric.Moore@lsi.com,
	stern@rowland.harvard.edu, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp,
	zaitcev@redhat.com, Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com,
	sfr@canb.auug.org.au, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
	paul.clements@steeleye.com, tim@cyberelk.net,
	jeremy@xensource.com, adrian@mcmen.demon.co.uk, oakad@yahoo.com,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	ballabio_dario@emc.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com,
	bharrosh@panasas.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] block: hide request sector and data_len
Date: Mon,  4 May 2009 16:58:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1241423927-11871-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241423927-11871-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Block low level drivers for some reason have been pretty good at
abusing block layer API.  Especially struct request's fields tend to
get violated in all possible ways.  Make it clear that low level
drivers MUST NOT access or manipulate rq->sector and rq->data_len
directly by prefixing them with double underscores.

This change is also necessary to break build of out-of-tree codes
which assume the previous block API where internal fields can be
manipulated and rq->data_len carries residual count on completion.

[ Impact: hide internal fields, block API change ]

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 block/blk-core.c       |   20 ++++++++++----------
 block/blk-map.c        |    2 +-
 block/blk-merge.c      |    2 +-
 include/linux/blkdev.h |    9 +++++----
 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 3596ca7..6226a38 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ void blk_rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->timeout_list);
 	rq->cpu = -1;
 	rq->q = q;
-	rq->sector = (sector_t) -1;
+	rq->__sector = (sector_t) -1;
 	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&rq->hash);
 	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&rq->rb_node);
 	rq->cmd = rq->__cmd;
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio)
 		req->cmd_flags |= REQ_NOIDLE;
 
 	req->errors = 0;
-	req->sector = bio->bi_sector;
+	req->__sector = bio->bi_sector;
 	req->ioprio = bio_prio(bio);
 	blk_rq_bio_prep(req->q, req, bio);
 }
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 
 		req->biotail->bi_next = bio;
 		req->biotail = bio;
-		req->data_len += bytes;
+		req->__data_len += bytes;
 		req->ioprio = ioprio_best(req->ioprio, prio);
 		if (!blk_rq_cpu_valid(req))
 			req->cpu = bio->bi_comp_cpu;
@@ -1169,8 +1169,8 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 		 * not touch req->buffer either...
 		 */
 		req->buffer = bio_data(bio);
-		req->sector = bio->bi_sector;
-		req->data_len += bytes;
+		req->__sector = bio->bi_sector;
+		req->__data_len += bytes;
 		req->ioprio = ioprio_best(req->ioprio, prio);
 		if (!blk_rq_cpu_valid(req))
 			req->cpu = bio->bi_comp_cpu;
@@ -1878,7 +1878,7 @@ bool blk_update_request(struct request *req, int error, unsigned int nr_bytes)
 		 * can find how many bytes remain in the request
 		 * later.
 		 */
-		req->data_len = 0;
+		req->__data_len = 0;
 		return false;
 	}
 
@@ -1892,12 +1892,12 @@ bool blk_update_request(struct request *req, int error, unsigned int nr_bytes)
 		bio_iovec(bio)->bv_len -= nr_bytes;
 	}
 
-	req->data_len -= total_bytes;
+	req->__data_len -= total_bytes;
 	req->buffer = bio_data(req->bio);
 
 	/* update sector only for requests with clear definition of sector */
 	if (blk_fs_request(req) || blk_discard_rq(req))
-		req->sector += total_bytes >> 9;
+		req->__sector += total_bytes >> 9;
 
 	/*
 	 * If total number of sectors is less than the first segment
@@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@ bool blk_update_request(struct request *req, int error, unsigned int nr_bytes)
 	 */
 	if (blk_rq_bytes(req) < blk_rq_cur_bytes(req)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "blk: request botched\n");
-		req->data_len = blk_rq_cur_bytes(req);
+		req->__data_len = blk_rq_cur_bytes(req);
 	}
 
 	/* recalculate the number of segments */
@@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@ void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
 		rq->nr_phys_segments = bio_phys_segments(q, bio);
 		rq->buffer = bio_data(bio);
 	}
-	rq->data_len = bio->bi_size;
+	rq->__data_len = bio->bi_size;
 	rq->bio = rq->biotail = bio;
 
 	if (bio->bi_bdev)
diff --git a/block/blk-map.c b/block/blk-map.c
index 694fefa..56082be 100644
--- a/block/blk-map.c
+++ b/block/blk-map.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ int blk_rq_append_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
 		rq->biotail->bi_next = bio;
 		rq->biotail = bio;
 
-		rq->data_len += bio->bi_size;
+		rq->__data_len += bio->bi_size;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index b8df66a..4974dd5 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static int attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
 	req->biotail->bi_next = next->bio;
 	req->biotail = next->biotail;
 
-	req->data_len += blk_rq_bytes(next);
+	req->__data_len += blk_rq_bytes(next);
 
 	elv_merge_requests(q, req, next);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 723d22e..6617abd 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -166,8 +166,9 @@ struct request {
 	enum rq_cmd_type_bits cmd_type;
 	unsigned long atomic_flags;
 
-	sector_t sector;	/* sector cursor */
-	unsigned int data_len;	/* total data len, don't access directly */
+	/* the following two fields are internal, NEVER access directly */
+	sector_t __sector;		/* sector cursor */
+	unsigned int __data_len;	/* total data len */
 
 	struct bio *bio;
 	struct bio *biotail;
@@ -829,12 +830,12 @@ extern void blkdev_dequeue_request(struct request *req);
  */
 static inline sector_t blk_rq_pos(const struct request *rq)
 {
-	return rq->sector;
+	return rq->__sector;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int blk_rq_bytes(const struct request *rq)
 {
-	return rq->data_len;
+	return rq->__data_len;
 }
 
 static inline int blk_rq_cur_bytes(const struct request *rq)
-- 
1.6.0.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-04  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-04  7:58 [GIT PATCH] block,scsi,ide: unify sector and data_len, take#2 Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58 ` [PATCH 01/11] nbd: don't clear rq->sector and nr_sectors unnecessarily Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58 ` [PATCH 02/11] ide-tape: don't initialize rq->sector for rw requests Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: add rq->resid_len Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-04 12:08   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-05  3:41     ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-07 10:23   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-10 14:07   ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-10 23:48     ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-11  5:49       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-11 14:18         ` James Bottomley
2009-05-11 15:03           ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-11 15:13             ` James Bottomley
2009-05-11 23:47               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-12  0:19           ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-12  3:43             ` James Bottomley
2009-05-12  6:04               ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-12 14:08                 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-12 14:34                   ` Alan Stern
2009-05-12 14:34                     ` Alan Stern
2009-05-12 15:17                   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-12 15:45                     ` James Bottomley
2009-05-13  6:30                       ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-11 11:31       ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-11 14:59         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-12  8:58           ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-12 15:00             ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-12 15:08               ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-12 15:16               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-12  0:27         ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-12  8:46           ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-12  9:07             ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-12  9:10               ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-12  9:52               ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-12 10:06                 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-12 11:08                   ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-12 15:20                     ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-12 15:53                       ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-04  7:58 ` [PATCH 04/11] block: implement blk_rq_pos/[cur_]sectors() and convert obvious ones Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-04 13:45   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-05  3:42     ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58 ` [PATCH 05/11] block: convert to pos and nr_sectors accessors Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-04 19:48   ` Adrian McMenamin
2009-05-05  3:42     ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58 ` [PATCH 06/11] ide: convert to rq " Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58 ` [PATCH 07/11] block: drop request->hard_* and *nr_sectors Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58 ` [PATCH 08/11] block: cleanup rq->data_len usages Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-04 14:41   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-11 12:02   ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-04  7:58 ` [PATCH 09/11] ide: " Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-05-04  7:58   ` [PATCH 10/11] block: hide request sector and data_len Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58 ` [PATCH 11/11] block: blk_rq_[cur_]_{sectors|bytes}() usage cleanup Tejun Heo
2009-05-04  7:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-05  3:59 ` [GIT PATCH] block,scsi,ide: unify sector and data_len, take#2 Tejun Heo
2009-05-05  3:59   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-07  2:48   ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-07  2:48     ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-07 10:23 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-08  2:06   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-08  9:11     ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-11 12:06 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-12  0:49   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1241423927-11871-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.