From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: tree build failure
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:57:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1255561026.29192.0.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1255115648.2546.71.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:14 -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Rusty's version of BUILD_BUG_ON() does indeed fix the build break, and
> also exposes the bug in kvmppc_account_exit_stat(). So to recap:
>
> original: built but didn't work
> Jan's: doesn't build
> Rusty's: builds and works
>
> Where do you want to go from here?
Jan, what are your thoughts? Your BUILD_BUG_ON patch has broken the
build, and we still need to fix it.
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: tree build failure
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:57:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1255561026.29192.0.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1255115648.2546.71.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:14 -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Rusty's version of BUILD_BUG_ON() does indeed fix the build break, and
> also exposes the bug in kvmppc_account_exit_stat(). So to recap:
>
> original: built but didn't work
> Jan's: doesn't build
> Rusty's: builds and works
>
> Where do you want to go from here?
Jan, what are your thoughts? Your BUILD_BUG_ON patch has broken the
build, and we still need to fix it.
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: tree build failure
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:57:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1255561026.29192.0.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1255115648.2546.71.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:14 -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Rusty's version of BUILD_BUG_ON() does indeed fix the build break, and
> also exposes the bug in kvmppc_account_exit_stat(). So to recap:
>
> original: built but didn't work
> Jan's: doesn't build
> Rusty's: builds and works
>
> Where do you want to go from here?
Jan, what are your thoughts? Your BUILD_BUG_ON patch has broken the
build, and we still need to fix it.
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-14 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 135+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 9:28 linux-next: tree build failure Jan Beulich
2009-09-29 9:28 ` Jan Beulich
2009-09-29 9:28 ` Jan Beulich
2009-09-29 9:28 ` Jan Beulich
2009-09-29 9:51 ` roel kluin
2009-09-29 9:51 ` roel kluin
2009-09-29 9:51 ` roel kluin
2009-09-29 9:51 ` roel kluin
2009-09-30 6:29 ` Jan Beulich
2009-09-30 6:29 ` Jan Beulich
2009-09-30 6:29 ` Jan Beulich
2009-09-30 6:29 ` Jan Beulich
2009-09-29 23:39 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-09-29 23:39 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-09-29 23:39 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-09-29 23:39 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-09-30 6:35 ` Jan Beulich
2009-09-30 6:35 ` Jan Beulich
2009-09-30 6:35 ` Jan Beulich
2009-09-30 6:35 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-02 15:48 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-02 15:48 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-02 15:48 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-02 15:48 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-05 6:58 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-05 6:58 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-05 6:58 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-05 6:58 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-09 19:14 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-09 19:14 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-09 19:14 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-14 22:57 ` Hollis Blanchard [this message]
2009-10-14 22:57 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-14 22:57 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-15 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-15 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-15 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-15 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-19 18:19 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-19 18:19 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-19 18:19 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-20 1:12 ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-20 1:24 ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-20 1:12 ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-20 1:29 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-20 1:29 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-20 1:29 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-20 1:29 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-20 3:45 ` [PATCH] BUILD_BUG_ON: make it handle more cases Rusty Russell
2009-10-20 3:57 ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-20 3:45 ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-20 3:45 ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-20 13:58 ` Américo Wang
2009-10-20 13:58 ` Américo Wang
2009-10-20 13:58 ` Américo Wang
2009-10-20 14:43 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-10-20 14:43 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-10-20 14:43 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-10-23 1:50 ` Américo Wang
2009-10-23 1:50 ` Américo Wang
2009-10-23 1:50 ` Américo Wang
2009-10-23 1:50 ` Américo Wang
2009-10-22 21:04 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-22 21:04 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-22 21:04 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-22 21:04 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-29 21:30 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-29 21:30 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-10-29 21:30 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-11-05 0:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-05 0:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-05 0:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-05 0:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-05 6:28 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-05 6:40 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-05 6:28 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-05 6:37 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-05 6:49 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-05 6:37 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-05 6:37 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-05 6:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-05 6:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-05 6:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-06 6:30 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-06 6:42 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-06 6:30 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-06 6:30 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-05 6:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-05 6:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-05 6:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-16 7:21 linux-next: tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-16 9:02 ` Felipe Balbi
2009-12-16 10:10 ` Liam Girdwood
2009-12-16 10:10 ` Liam Girdwood
2009-10-01 3:19 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-01 7:58 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-01 10:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-24 5:21 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-24 5:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-24 5:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-29 0:00 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-09-29 0:00 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-09-29 0:00 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-09-29 0:00 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-08-17 8:39 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-03 0:35 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-03 1:01 ` NeilBrown
2009-08-03 1:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-27 7:53 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-27 9:21 ` Karsten Keil
2009-07-27 15:06 ` David Miller
2009-07-28 4:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-07 3:41 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-07 10:00 ` Mark Brown
2009-04-08 1:48 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-03-23 9:38 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-23 22:27 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-03-23 23:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-05 7:41 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-06 5:01 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-16 5:37 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-16 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-16 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-16 10:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-16 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-16 11:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-16 12:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-28 10:04 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-28 10:25 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-28 10:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-28 17:23 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-10-21 8:30 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-25 10:33 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-25 16:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-06-30 14:35 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1255561026.29192.0.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=hollisb@us.ibm.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.