All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org,
	microblaze-uclinux-rVRm/Wmeqae7NGdpmJTKYQ@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_devtree() and early_init_move_devtree()
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:04:08 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1259208248.16367.230.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091124081853.6216.68105.stgit@angua>

On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 01:19 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:

>  
> -static int __init early_init_dt_scan_cpus(unsigned long node,
> -					  const char *uname, int depth,
> -					  void *data)
> +int __init early_init_dt_scan_cpus(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> +				   int depth, void *data)
>  {

So now you make this one non-static as well with little hope of making
it static ever again

>  	static int logical_cpuid;
>  	char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
> @@ -113,8 +112,8 @@ void __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen_arch(unsigned long node)
>  	/* No Microblaze specific code here */
>  }
>  
> -static int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long node,
> -				const char *uname, int depth, void *data)
> +int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> +				     int depth, void *data)
>  {

And this one

>  	char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
>  	u32 *reg, *endp;
> @@ -201,7 +200,7 @@ static inline unsigned long phyp_dump_calculate_reserve_size(void)
>   * without reserving anything. The memory in case of dump being
>   * active is freed when the dump is collected (by userland tools).
>   */
> -static void __init phyp_dump_reserve_mem(void)
> +void __init phyp_dump_reserve_mem(void)
>  {

And this one...

>  /**
> + * early_init_move_devtree - move tree to an unused area, if needed.
> + *
> + * The device tree may be allocated beyond our memory limit, or inside the
> + * crash kernel region for kdump. If so, move it out of the way.
> + */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC)
> +static void __init early_init_move_devtree(void)

And you still end up with an ifdef mess in the common code ...

Would it be possible instead to have one common early_init_devtree()
that calls into the "common" ones (which you can then make static again,
inside the common code) and then calls one arch_early_init_devtree()
which regroups the arch specific ones ?

Or there's too many ordering issues ?

Another option then is to call from that early_init_devtree() something
like:

	arch_early_init_dt_mem()
	arch_early_init_dt_cpu()
	arch_early_init_move_devtree()

etc... in the right spots in the common code and have the archs who
don't do anything there just have them as empty inlines.

Cheers,
Ben.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org,
	microblaze-uclinux-rVRm/Wmeqae7NGdpmJTKYQ@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_devtree() and
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:04:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1259208248.16367.230.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091124081853.6216.68105.stgit@angua>

On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 01:19 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:

>  
> -static int __init early_init_dt_scan_cpus(unsigned long node,
> -					  const char *uname, int depth,
> -					  void *data)
> +int __init early_init_dt_scan_cpus(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> +				   int depth, void *data)
>  {

So now you make this one non-static as well with little hope of making
it static ever again

>  	static int logical_cpuid;
>  	char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
> @@ -113,8 +112,8 @@ void __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen_arch(unsigned long node)
>  	/* No Microblaze specific code here */
>  }
>  
> -static int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long node,
> -				const char *uname, int depth, void *data)
> +int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> +				     int depth, void *data)
>  {

And this one

>  	char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
>  	u32 *reg, *endp;
> @@ -201,7 +200,7 @@ static inline unsigned long phyp_dump_calculate_reserve_size(void)
>   * without reserving anything. The memory in case of dump being
>   * active is freed when the dump is collected (by userland tools).
>   */
> -static void __init phyp_dump_reserve_mem(void)
> +void __init phyp_dump_reserve_mem(void)
>  {

And this one...

>  /**
> + * early_init_move_devtree - move tree to an unused area, if needed.
> + *
> + * The device tree may be allocated beyond our memory limit, or inside the
> + * crash kernel region for kdump. If so, move it out of the way.
> + */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC)
> +static void __init early_init_move_devtree(void)

And you still end up with an ifdef mess in the common code ...

Would it be possible instead to have one common early_init_devtree()
that calls into the "common" ones (which you can then make static again,
inside the common code) and then calls one arch_early_init_devtree()
which regroups the arch specific ones ?

Or there's too many ordering issues ?

Another option then is to call from that early_init_devtree() something
like:

	arch_early_init_dt_mem()
	arch_early_init_dt_cpu()
	arch_early_init_move_devtree()

etc... in the right spots in the common code and have the archs who
don't do anything there just have them as empty inlines.

Cheers,
Ben.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, monstr@monstr.eu,
	microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_devtree() and early_init_move_devtree()
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:04:08 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1259208248.16367.230.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091124081853.6216.68105.stgit@angua>

On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 01:19 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:

>  
> -static int __init early_init_dt_scan_cpus(unsigned long node,
> -					  const char *uname, int depth,
> -					  void *data)
> +int __init early_init_dt_scan_cpus(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> +				   int depth, void *data)
>  {

So now you make this one non-static as well with little hope of making
it static ever again

>  	static int logical_cpuid;
>  	char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
> @@ -113,8 +112,8 @@ void __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen_arch(unsigned long node)
>  	/* No Microblaze specific code here */
>  }
>  
> -static int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long node,
> -				const char *uname, int depth, void *data)
> +int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> +				     int depth, void *data)
>  {

And this one

>  	char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
>  	u32 *reg, *endp;
> @@ -201,7 +200,7 @@ static inline unsigned long phyp_dump_calculate_reserve_size(void)
>   * without reserving anything. The memory in case of dump being
>   * active is freed when the dump is collected (by userland tools).
>   */
> -static void __init phyp_dump_reserve_mem(void)
> +void __init phyp_dump_reserve_mem(void)
>  {

And this one...

>  /**
> + * early_init_move_devtree - move tree to an unused area, if needed.
> + *
> + * The device tree may be allocated beyond our memory limit, or inside the
> + * crash kernel region for kdump. If so, move it out of the way.
> + */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC)
> +static void __init early_init_move_devtree(void)

And you still end up with an ifdef mess in the common code ...

Would it be possible instead to have one common early_init_devtree()
that calls into the "common" ones (which you can then make static again,
inside the common code) and then calls one arch_early_init_devtree()
which regroups the arch specific ones ?

Or there's too many ordering issues ?

Another option then is to call from that early_init_devtree() something
like:

	arch_early_init_dt_mem()
	arch_early_init_dt_cpu()
	arch_early_init_move_devtree()

etc... in the right spots in the common code and have the archs who
don't do anything there just have them as empty inlines.

Cheers,
Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-26  4:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-24  8:17 [PATCH 00/11] Yet another series of OF merge patches Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:17 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:17 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:17 ` [PATCH 01/11] of/flattree: Merge early_init_dt_check_for_initrd() Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:17   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:17   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  3:51   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  3:51     ` [PATCH 01/11] of/flattree: Merge Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  4:02     ` [PATCH 01/11] of/flattree: Merge early_init_dt_check_for_initrd() Grant Likely
2009-11-26  4:02       ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  4:02       ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:18 ` [PATCH 02/11] of/flattree: Merge earlyinit_dt_scan_root() Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:18   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:18   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  3:54   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  3:54     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  3:54     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  4:03     ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  4:03       ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  4:03       ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:18 ` [PATCH 03/11] of/flattree: merge dt_mem_next_cell Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:18   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:18   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  3:55   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  3:55     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  3:55     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-24  8:18 ` [PATCH 04/11] of/flattree: eliminate cell_t typedef Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:18   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:18   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  3:59   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  3:59     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  3:59     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  4:05     ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  4:05       ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  4:05       ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  5:27       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  5:27         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26 21:36         ` Segher Boessenkool
2009-11-26 21:36           ` Segher Boessenkool
2009-11-26 21:36           ` Segher Boessenkool
2009-11-26 21:40           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26 21:40             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26 21:40             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26 23:32           ` David Miller
2009-11-26 23:32             ` David Miller
2009-11-26 23:32             ` David Miller
2009-12-11  6:43         ` Grant Likely
2009-12-11  6:43           ` Grant Likely
2009-12-11  6:43           ` Grant Likely
     [not found]       ` <fa686aa40911252005o2db85dfk3d9acc61c12ca5e5-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26  6:28         ` M. Warner Losh
2009-11-26  6:28           ` M. Warner Losh
2009-11-26  6:28           ` M. Warner Losh
     [not found]           ` <20091125.232818.-1350498258.imp-uzTCJ5RojNnQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26  7:06             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  7:06               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  7:06               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  7:52               ` Mitch Bradley
2009-11-26  7:52                 ` Mitch Bradley
2009-11-26  7:52                 ` Mitch Bradley
2009-11-24  8:18 ` [PATCH 05/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_dt_scan_chosen() Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:18   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:18   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19 ` [PATCH 06/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_devtree() and early_init_move_devtree() Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19   ` [PATCH 06/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_devtree() and Grant Likely
2009-11-26  4:04   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-11-26  4:04     ` [PATCH 06/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_devtree() and early_init_move_devtree() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  4:04     ` [PATCH 06/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_devtree() and Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-11  6:19     ` [PATCH 06/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_devtree() and early_init_move_devtree() Grant Likely
2009-12-11  6:19       ` Grant Likely
2009-12-11  6:19       ` [PATCH 06/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_devtree() and Grant Likely
2009-12-07  7:08   ` [PATCH 06/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_devtree() and early_init_move_devtree() Jeremy Kerr
2009-12-07  7:08     ` Jeremy Kerr
2009-12-07  7:08     ` Jeremy Kerr
2009-12-11  6:20     ` Grant Likely
2009-12-11  6:20       ` Grant Likely
2009-12-11  6:20       ` [PATCH 06/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_devtree() and Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19 ` [PATCH 07/11] of: merge machine_is_compatible() Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  4:05   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  4:05     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  4:05     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-11  6:54     ` Grant Likely
2009-12-11  6:54       ` Grant Likely
2009-12-11  6:54       ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19 ` [PATCH 08/11] of: Merge of_node_get() and of_node_put() Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  4:06   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  4:06     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  4:06     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-24  8:19 ` [PATCH 09/11] of: merge of_attach_node() & of_detach_node() Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26  4:07   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  4:07     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-26  4:07     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-10 22:21     ` Grant Likely
2009-12-10 22:21       ` Grant Likely
2009-12-10 22:21       ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19 ` [PATCH 10/11] microblaze: gut implementation of early_init_dt_scan_cpus() Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:19   ` [PATCH 10/11] microblaze: gut implementation of Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:20 ` [PATCH 11/11] of: unify phandle name in struct device_node Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:20   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24  8:20   ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24 17:37   ` David Miller
2009-11-24 17:37     ` David Miller
2009-11-24 17:37     ` David Miller
2009-11-24 20:33     ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24 20:33       ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24 20:33       ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24 21:10       ` David Miller
2009-11-24 21:10         ` David Miller
     [not found]     ` <20091124.093732.203692950.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-24 21:06       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-24 21:06         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-24 21:06         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-24 21:39         ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24 21:39           ` Grant Likely
2009-11-24 21:39           ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 12:28 ` [PATCH 00/11] Yet another series of OF merge patches Wolfram Sang
2009-11-26 12:28   ` Wolfram Sang
2009-11-26 12:28   ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1259208248.16367.230.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh-xvmvhmargas8u2djnn8i7kb+6bgklq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=microblaze-uclinux-rVRm/Wmeqae7NGdpmJTKYQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.