All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND)
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:33:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288200823.5619.46.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288195668.2709.167.camel@edumazet-laptop>

Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 à 18:07 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :

> So I tried following experiment :
> 
> # swapoff
> # numactl --membind=0 swapon -a
> # grep swap /proc/vmallocinfo 
> 0xf9bf3000-0xf9cf4000 1052672 sys_swapon+0x4aa/0xb24 pages=256 vmalloc N0=256
> # swapoff -a
> # numactl --membind=1 swapon -a
> 
> <<FREEZE>>
> 

Crash in fact, not freeze, in slab_node()

Problem is : we dereference a NULL zone pointer.

(node 1 has HighMem only)

Following patch seems to solve the problem for me

# swapoff -a
# numactl --membind=1 swapon -a
# grep swap /proc/vmallocinfo 
0xf9da5000-0xf9ea6000 1052672 sys_swapon+0x3f9/0xa34 pages=256 vmalloc N1=256


Thanks


[PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND) 

When a node contains only HighMem memory, slab_node(MPOL_BIND)
dereferences a NULL pointer.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
 mm/mempolicy.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 81a1276..4a57f13 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ unsigned slab_node(struct mempolicy *policy)
 		(void)first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, highest_zoneidx,
 							&policy->v.nodes,
 							&zone);
-		return zone->node;
+		return zone ? zone->node : numa_node_id();
 	}
 
 	default:



  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-27 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-25 22:41 [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26  9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 10:22 ` David Howells
2010-10-26 12:14   ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:27     ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:45       ` [PATCH] x86, percpu: revert commit fe8e0c25 Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:25         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 13:34           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:49             ` Brian Gerst
2010-10-26 15:08               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27  5:43                 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Brian Gerst
2010-10-27  6:07                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27  9:57                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 13:33                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 13:42                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 13:57                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:00                             ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:24                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:39                                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:39                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:43                                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:21                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 15:35                                       ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 16:07                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 17:33                                           ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-28 15:59                                             ` [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND) Linus Torvalds
2010-10-28 16:27                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 16:45                                               ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-28 16:55                                               ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-28 21:07                                                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-29 14:55                                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-27 20:55                                         ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 12:01                                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-28 12:30                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 14:40                       ` [PATCH] x86-32: NUMA irq stacks allocations Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29  6:43                         ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Restore irq stacks NUMA-aware allocations tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 18:32                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 20:09                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:28                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:53                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 20:59                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:58                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 21:21                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-27 15:19                   ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 15:30                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:33                       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:40                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:43                           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 16:03                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 16:04                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] percpu: Remove the multi-page alignment facility tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 14:06         ` [RFC PATCH] percpu: always align percpu output section to PAGE_SIZE Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  6:46           ` [Uclinux-dist-devel] " Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24  6:46             ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24  8:25             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:25               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:51               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:51                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 13:46                 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 13:46                   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 17:51                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:54           ` [PATCH UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 14:50   ` [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 14:56     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1288200823.5619.46.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.