All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>,
	linux-am33-list@redhat.com,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Akira Takeuchi <takeuchi.akr@jp.panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [RFC PATCH] percpu: always align percpu output section to PAGE_SIZE
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:46:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=WWCPJeQ8DVv1j7GF0J61DiUupiOEuxDCW8_Xd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC6E05A.8040508@kernel.org>

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:06, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The linker script macros PERCPU_VADDR() and PERCPU() are used to
> define this output section and the latter takes @align parameter.
> Several architectures are using @align smaller than PAGE_SIZE breaking
> percpu memory alignment.

hmm, i just pushed through a fix in the Blackfin tree as we hit a boot
failure otherwise:
-   PERCPU(4)
+   PERCPU(PAGE_SIZE)

> This patch removes @align parameter from PERCPU(), renames it to
> PERCPU_SECTION and makes it always align to PAGE_SIZE.  While at it,
> add PCPU_SETUP_BUG_ON() checks such that alignment problems are
> reliably detected and remove percpu alignment comment recently added
> in workqueue.c as the condition would trigger BUG way before reaching
> there.

seems this still hasnt made it to mainline.  has it stalled or
something ?  feel free for the Blackfin bits:
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
-mike

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>,
	linux-am33-list@redhat.com,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Akira Takeuchi <takeuchi.akr@jp.panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [RFC PATCH] percpu: always align percpu output section to PAGE_SIZE
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:46:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=WWCPJeQ8DVv1j7GF0J61DiUupiOEuxDCW8_Xd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC6E05A.8040508@kernel.org>

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:06, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The linker script macros PERCPU_VADDR() and PERCPU() are used to
> define this output section and the latter takes @align parameter.
> Several architectures are using @align smaller than PAGE_SIZE breaking
> percpu memory alignment.

hmm, i just pushed through a fix in the Blackfin tree as we hit a boot
failure otherwise:
-   PERCPU(4)
+   PERCPU(PAGE_SIZE)

> This patch removes @align parameter from PERCPU(), renames it to
> PERCPU_SECTION and makes it always align to PAGE_SIZE.  While at it,
> add PCPU_SETUP_BUG_ON() checks such that alignment problems are
> reliably detected and remove percpu alignment comment recently added
> in workqueue.c as the condition would trigger BUG way before reaching
> there.

seems this still hasnt made it to mainline.  has it stalled or
something ?  feel free for the Blackfin bits:
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-24  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-25 22:41 [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26  9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 10:22 ` David Howells
2010-10-26 12:14   ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:27     ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:45       ` [PATCH] x86, percpu: revert commit fe8e0c25 Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:25         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 13:34           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:49             ` Brian Gerst
2010-10-26 15:08               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27  5:43                 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Brian Gerst
2010-10-27  6:07                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27  9:57                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 13:33                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 13:42                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 13:57                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:00                             ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:24                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:39                                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:39                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:43                                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:21                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 15:35                                       ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 16:07                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 17:33                                           ` [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND) Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 15:59                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-28 16:27                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 16:45                                               ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-28 16:55                                               ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-28 21:07                                                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-29 14:55                                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-27 20:55                                         ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 12:01                                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-28 12:30                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 14:40                       ` [PATCH] x86-32: NUMA irq stacks allocations Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29  6:43                         ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Restore irq stacks NUMA-aware allocations tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 18:32                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 20:09                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:28                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:53                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 20:59                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:58                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 21:21                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-27 15:19                   ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 15:30                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:33                       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:40                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:43                           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 16:03                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 16:04                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] percpu: Remove the multi-page alignment facility tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 14:06         ` [RFC PATCH] percpu: always align percpu output section to PAGE_SIZE Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  6:46           ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2011-03-24  6:46             ` [Uclinux-dist-devel] " Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24  8:25             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:25               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:51               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:51                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 13:46                 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 13:46                   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 17:51                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:54           ` [PATCH UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 14:50   ` [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 14:56     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTi=WWCPJeQ8DVv1j7GF0J61DiUupiOEuxDCW8_Xd@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=vapier@gentoo.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-am33-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=takeuchi.akr@jp.panasonic.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.