All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:27:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288283277.11523.18.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikmNc7qqDzoff_3i_FRbG=pmOC7TG3eeZnmvaTD@mail.gmail.com>

Le jeudi 28 octobre 2010 à 08:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds a écrit :
> Hmm. More people added to the discussion..
> 
> This code seems to go back all the way to commit 19770b32609b: "mm:
> filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask". Which was back in
> April 2008. and got merged into 2.6.26.
> 
> And I'd be happy to commit it (in fact, I was going to), but when
> looking for other uses of first_zones_zonelist(), I found
> local_memory_node() which does the exact same thing: ignore the return
> value, and unconditionally dereference the resulting 'zone' variable.
> 
> And so does - although less obviously - mm/vmscan.c for the
> wait_iff_confgested() thing.
> 
> So are those buggy too, since first_zones_zonelist() can apparently return NULL?
> 
> Please advise...
> 

local_memory_node() is for ia64 only, and it is a bit different :

(void)first_zones_zonelist(node_zonelist(node, GFP_KERNEL),
	gfp_zone(GFP_KERNEL),
	NULL,
	&zone);

Apparently node_zonelist(node, GFP_KERNEL) returns a pointer to
something that must have a zone suitable for GFP_KERNEL

While the code I tried to fix uses :

zonelist = &NODE_DATA(numa_node_id())->node_zonelists[0];
without any guarantee it contains a LOWMEM zone


Also check commit 7eb54824b76793dd86afb54f182ef9aa64b3a45a
for a similar fix in the past.

About do_try_to_free_pages(), I can not comment on this one, sorry.




  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-28 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-25 22:41 [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26  9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 10:22 ` David Howells
2010-10-26 12:14   ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:27     ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:45       ` [PATCH] x86, percpu: revert commit fe8e0c25 Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:25         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 13:34           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:49             ` Brian Gerst
2010-10-26 15:08               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27  5:43                 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Brian Gerst
2010-10-27  6:07                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27  9:57                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 13:33                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 13:42                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 13:57                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:00                             ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:24                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:39                                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:39                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:43                                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:21                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 15:35                                       ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 16:07                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 17:33                                           ` [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND) Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 15:59                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-28 16:27                                               ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-28 16:45                                               ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-28 16:55                                               ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-28 21:07                                                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-29 14:55                                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-27 20:55                                         ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 12:01                                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-28 12:30                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 14:40                       ` [PATCH] x86-32: NUMA irq stacks allocations Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29  6:43                         ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Restore irq stacks NUMA-aware allocations tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 18:32                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 20:09                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:28                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:53                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 20:59                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:58                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 21:21                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-27 15:19                   ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 15:30                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:33                       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:40                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:43                           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 16:03                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 16:04                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] percpu: Remove the multi-page alignment facility tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 14:06         ` [RFC PATCH] percpu: always align percpu output section to PAGE_SIZE Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  6:46           ` [Uclinux-dist-devel] " Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24  6:46             ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24  8:25             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:25               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:51               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:51                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 13:46                 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 13:46                   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 17:51                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:54           ` [PATCH UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 14:50   ` [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 14:56     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1288283277.11523.18.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.