From: "Matti J. Aaltonen" <matti.j.aaltonen@nokia.com> To: ext Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> Cc: ext Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lrg@slimlogic.co.uk, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, sameo@linux.intel.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: WL1273 FM Radio driver... Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:47:58 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1297241278.15320.90.camel@masi.mnp.nokia.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4D501704.6060504@redhat.com> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:00 -0200, ext Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 07-02-2011 12:17, Matti J. Aaltonen escreveu: > > On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 13:52 +0000, ext Mark Brown wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:48:17AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>> Em 07-02-2011 11:10, Mark Brown escreveu: > >> > >>>> There is an audio driver for this chip and it is using those functions. > >> > >>> Where are the other drivers that depend on it? > >> > >> Nothing's been merged yet to my knowledge, Matti can comment on any > >> incoming boards which will use it (rx51?). > > > > Yes, nothing's been merged yet. There are only dependencies between the > > parts of this driver... I cannot comment on upcoming boards, I just hope > > we could agree on a sensible structure for this thing. > > We don't need any brand names or specific details, but it would be good to > have an overview, in general lines, about the architecture, in order to help > you to map how this would fit. In particular, the architecturre of > things that are tightly coupled and can't be splitted by some bus abstraction. I understand what you are saying but obviously I cannot think like a sub-system maintainer:-) What I see here is a piece of hardware with lots of capabilities: FM RX and TX with analog and digital audio, I2C and UART control... I would have thought that the goal is to make a driver that's as "general" as possible and to make it possible to use the chip in all kinds of architectures and scenarios. But we have been using the driver in principle in its current form. But if the interface to the users has to be split in a different way, I don't see that as a major problem. But on the other hand I can't see the ASoC / V4L2 division going away completely. The users won't probably care if we have MFD or not. Cheers, Matti > Mauro.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Matti J. Aaltonen" <matti.j.aaltonen@nokia.com> To: ext Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, ext Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, lrg@slimlogic.co.uk, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: WL1273 FM Radio driver... Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:47:58 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1297241278.15320.90.camel@masi.mnp.nokia.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4D501704.6060504@redhat.com> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:00 -0200, ext Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 07-02-2011 12:17, Matti J. Aaltonen escreveu: > > On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 13:52 +0000, ext Mark Brown wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:48:17AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>> Em 07-02-2011 11:10, Mark Brown escreveu: > >> > >>>> There is an audio driver for this chip and it is using those functions. > >> > >>> Where are the other drivers that depend on it? > >> > >> Nothing's been merged yet to my knowledge, Matti can comment on any > >> incoming boards which will use it (rx51?). > > > > Yes, nothing's been merged yet. There are only dependencies between the > > parts of this driver... I cannot comment on upcoming boards, I just hope > > we could agree on a sensible structure for this thing. > > We don't need any brand names or specific details, but it would be good to > have an overview, in general lines, about the architecture, in order to help > you to map how this would fit. In particular, the architecturre of > things that are tightly coupled and can't be splitted by some bus abstraction. I understand what you are saying but obviously I cannot think like a sub-system maintainer:-) What I see here is a piece of hardware with lots of capabilities: FM RX and TX with analog and digital audio, I2C and UART control... I would have thought that the goal is to make a driver that's as "general" as possible and to make it possible to use the chip in all kinds of architectures and scenarios. But we have been using the driver in principle in its current form. But if the interface to the users has to be split in a different way, I don't see that as a major problem. But on the other hand I can't see the ASoC / V4L2 division going away completely. The users won't probably care if we have MFD or not. Cheers, Matti > Mauro.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 8:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-02-07 10:52 WL1273 FM Radio driver Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-07 12:00 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-02-07 12:02 ` Mark Brown 2011-02-07 12:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-02-07 13:10 ` Mark Brown 2011-02-07 13:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-02-07 13:52 ` Mark Brown 2011-02-07 14:17 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-07 14:17 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-07 16:00 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-02-08 9:15 ` [alsa-devel] " Peter Ujfalusi 2011-02-08 9:15 ` Peter Ujfalusi 2011-02-08 10:09 ` [alsa-devel] " Bensaid, Selma 2011-02-08 11:02 ` Peter Ujfalusi 2011-02-08 11:02 ` Peter Ujfalusi 2011-02-08 13:47 ` [alsa-devel] " Bensaid, Selma 2011-02-09 7:14 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-09 7:14 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-09 7:22 ` [alsa-devel] " Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-09 7:22 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-10 9:35 ` [alsa-devel] " Bensaid, Selma 2011-02-10 9:35 ` Bensaid, Selma 2011-02-10 10:03 ` [alsa-devel] " Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-10 10:03 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-10 11:02 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown 2011-02-10 12:10 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-10 12:10 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-10 12:28 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown 2011-02-10 12:28 ` Mark Brown 2011-02-10 12:57 ` [alsa-devel] " Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-10 12:57 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-10 13:23 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown 2011-02-09 7:27 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-09 7:27 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-09 8:47 ` Matti J. Aaltonen [this message] 2011-02-09 8:47 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-07 14:09 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-07 14:09 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-07 15:57 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-02-07 16:01 ` Mark Brown 2011-02-07 13:27 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-07 13:27 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-07 13:28 ` Mark Brown 2011-02-07 13:34 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-02-07 13:34 ` Matti J. Aaltonen -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2011-01-18 15:04 Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-01-18 15:04 ` Matti J. Aaltonen 2011-01-19 10:18 ` Mark Brown 2011-01-30 23:23 ` Samuel Ortiz 2011-02-02 15:35 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-02-02 15:51 ` Mark Brown 2011-02-03 0:37 ` Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1297241278.15320.90.camel@masi.mnp.nokia.com \ --to=matti.j.aaltonen@nokia.com \ --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \ --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \ --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \ --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \ --cc=mchehab@redhat.com \ --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.