All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re: __elv_add_request OOPS]
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:53:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306468385.4048.73.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306356735.1641.61.camel@mulgrave.site>

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:52 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 16:42 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> > Yeah - that makes sense. By that logic, looks like we can only disallow 
> > for SDEV_DEL (if we decide to do that check here).
> 
> I don't think this is the root cause.  I think q is non-NULL but has
> already been released, so we're just getting a NULL deref on the actual
> list head.
> 
> Does this fix it?  It adds the refcounting at approximately the correct
> places.  Of course, we'll now be trying elevator operations on an extant
> queue but one whose elevator functions have been destroyed, so there are
> probably additional state guards to place.
> 
> James
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> index 58584dc..44e8ca3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static struct scsi_device *scsi_alloc_sdev(struct scsi_target *starget,
>  		kfree(sdev);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> -
> +	blk_get_queue(sdev->request_queue);

Apparently we can't do this because blk_[put|get]_queue aren't exported
for use in modules (and SCSI can be modular), so this caused a build
failure in linux-next.

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-27  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-24  4:29 __elv_add_request OOPS Parag Warudkar
2011-05-24 10:44 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-24 10:44   ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25  1:41   ` [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re: __elv_add_request OOPS] Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25  1:41     ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25  7:37     ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25  7:37       ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 18:44       ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 18:44         ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 18:55         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 18:55           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 19:02           ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 19:02             ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 19:13             ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 19:13               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 19:17               ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 19:17                 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 19:52                 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 19:52                   ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:03                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:03                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:18                     ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:18                       ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:26                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:26                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:42                         ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:42                           ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:52                           ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 23:00                             ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 23:14                               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 23:45                                 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 23:52                                   ` Linus Torvalds
     [not found]                               ` <1306370123.1641.76.camel@mulgrave.site>
2011-05-26  1:01                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-26  1:06                                   ` James Bottomley
2011-05-26  1:43                                 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-27  3:53                             ` James Bottomley [this message]
2011-05-27  5:43                               ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-27 20:21                                 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-27 20:21                                   ` James Bottomley
2011-05-28 12:42                                   ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-28 12:42                                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-08  6:50                                   ` Torsten Hilbrich
2011-06-08  6:50                                     ` Torsten Hilbrich
2011-05-25 20:20                     ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 20:22                       ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:29                         ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 20:26   ` __elv_add_request OOPS James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1306468385.4048.73.camel@mulgrave.site \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.