From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> To: Shan Hai <haishan.bai@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, paulus@samba.org, tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com, dhowells@redhat.com, cmetcalf@tilera.com, tony.luck@intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fixup write permission of TLB on powerpc e500 core Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:12:56 +1000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1310721176.4968.316.camel@pasglop> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4E20037C.5070506@gmail.com> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 17:08 +0800, Shan Hai wrote: > The whole scenario should be, > - the child process triggers a page fault at the first time access to > the lock, and it got its own writable page, but its *clean* for > the reason just for checking the status of the lock. > I am sorry for above "unbreakable COW". > - the futex_lock_pi() is invoked because of the lock contention, > and the futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() tries to get the lock, > it found out the lock is free so tries to write to the lock for > reservation, a page fault occurs, because the page is read only > for kernel(e500 specific), and returns -EFAULT to the caller There is nothing e500 specific about user read only pages being read only for kernel. All architectures behave the same way here afaik. _However_ there is something not totally x86-like in the fact that we require handle_mm_fault() to deal with dirty and young tracking, which means that we -will- fault for a non-dirty writeable page or for any non-young page. It's quite possible that the page fault disabling occurs before that and thus breaks those architectures (it's not only e500 and afaik not only powerpc) while x86 works fine due to HW update of dirty and young. It might be something to look into. Cheers, Ben. > - the fault_in_user_writeable() tries to fix the fault, > but from the get_user_pages() view everything is ok, because > the COW was already broken, retry futex_lock_pi_atomic() > - futex_lock_pi_atomic() --> futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(), > another write protection page fault > - infinite loop > >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> To: Shan Hai <haishan.bai@gmail.com> Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com, dhowells@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fixup write permission of TLB on powerpc e500 core Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:12:56 +1000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1310721176.4968.316.camel@pasglop> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4E20037C.5070506@gmail.com> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 17:08 +0800, Shan Hai wrote: > The whole scenario should be, > - the child process triggers a page fault at the first time access to > the lock, and it got its own writable page, but its *clean* for > the reason just for checking the status of the lock. > I am sorry for above "unbreakable COW". > - the futex_lock_pi() is invoked because of the lock contention, > and the futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() tries to get the lock, > it found out the lock is free so tries to write to the lock for > reservation, a page fault occurs, because the page is read only > for kernel(e500 specific), and returns -EFAULT to the caller There is nothing e500 specific about user read only pages being read only for kernel. All architectures behave the same way here afaik. _However_ there is something not totally x86-like in the fact that we require handle_mm_fault() to deal with dirty and young tracking, which means that we -will- fault for a non-dirty writeable page or for any non-young page. It's quite possible that the page fault disabling occurs before that and thus breaks those architectures (it's not only e500 and afaik not only powerpc) while x86 works fine due to HW update of dirty and young. It might be something to look into. Cheers, Ben. > - the fault_in_user_writeable() tries to fix the fault, > but from the get_user_pages() view everything is ok, because > the COW was already broken, retry futex_lock_pi_atomic() > - futex_lock_pi_atomic() --> futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(), > another write protection page fault > - infinite loop > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-15 9:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 138+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-07-15 8:07 [PATCH 0/1] Fixup write permission of TLB on powerpc e500 core Shan Hai 2011-07-15 8:07 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-15 8:07 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Shan Hai 2011-07-15 8:07 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-15 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-15 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-15 15:18 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-15 15:18 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-15 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-15 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-16 15:36 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-16 15:36 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-16 14:50 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-16 14:50 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-16 23:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-16 23:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-17 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-17 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-17 14:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-17 14:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-17 23:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-17 23:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-18 3:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-18 3:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-18 4:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-18 4:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-18 4:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-18 4:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-18 6:48 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-18 6:48 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-18 7:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-18 7:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-18 7:26 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-18 7:26 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-18 7:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-18 7:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-18 7:50 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-18 7:50 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 3:30 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 3:30 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 4:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-19 4:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-19 4:29 ` [RFC/PATCH] mm/futex: Fix futex writes on archs with SW tracking of dirty & young Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-19 4:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-19 4:55 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 4:55 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 5:17 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 5:17 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 5:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-19 5:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-19 5:38 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 5:38 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 7:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-19 7:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-19 8:24 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 8:24 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 8:26 ` [RFC/PATCH] mm/futex: Fix futex writes on archs with SW trackingof " David Laight 2011-07-19 8:26 ` David Laight 2011-07-19 8:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-19 8:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-19 8:45 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 8:45 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-19 11:10 ` [RFC/PATCH] mm/futex: Fix futex writes on archs with SW tracking of " Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-19 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-20 14:39 ` Darren Hart 2011-07-20 14:39 ` Darren Hart 2011-07-21 22:36 ` Andrew Morton 2011-07-21 22:36 ` Andrew Morton 2011-07-21 22:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-21 22:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-21 22:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-21 22:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-21 22:59 ` Andrew Morton 2011-07-21 22:59 ` Andrew Morton 2011-07-22 1:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-22 1:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-22 1:54 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-22 1:54 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-27 6:50 ` Mike Frysinger 2011-07-27 6:50 ` Mike Frysinger 2011-07-27 7:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-27 7:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-27 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-27 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-27 10:09 ` David Howells 2011-07-27 10:09 ` David Howells 2011-07-27 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-27 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-27 10:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-27 10:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-28 0:12 ` Mike Frysinger 2011-07-28 0:12 ` Mike Frysinger 2011-08-08 2:31 ` Mike Frysinger 2011-08-08 2:31 ` Mike Frysinger 2011-07-28 10:55 ` David Howells 2011-07-28 10:55 ` David Howells 2011-07-17 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/1] Fixup write permission of TLB on powerpc e500 core Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-17 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-17 13:33 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-17 13:33 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-17 14:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-17 14:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-17 15:40 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-17 15:40 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-17 22:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-17 22:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-17 14:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-17 14:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-15 8:20 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-15 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-15 8:38 ` MailingLists 2011-07-15 8:38 ` MailingLists 2011-07-15 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-15 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-15 9:08 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-15 9:08 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-15 9:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message] 2011-07-15 9:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-15 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-15 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-15 10:06 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-15 10:06 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-15 10:32 ` David Laight 2011-07-15 10:32 ` David Laight 2011-07-15 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-15 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-07-15 15:32 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-15 15:32 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-16 0:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-16 0:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-16 15:03 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-16 15:03 ` Shan Hai 2011-07-15 23:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-15 23:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-15 9:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-15 9:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-15 9:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2011-07-15 9:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1310721176.4968.316.camel@pasglop \ --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \ --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \ --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \ --cc=haishan.bai@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=paulus@samba.org \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \ --cc=walken@google.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.