From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: David Wagner <david.wagner@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
tim.bird@am.sony.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top of UBI
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:14:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311833667.2169.1.camel@koala> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311683250-7921-1-git-send-email-david.wagner@free-electrons.com>
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:27 +0200, David Wagner wrote:
> * The numbering of devices is much easier with ubiblk than with
> gluebi+mtdblock_ro. With gluebi+mtdblock_ro, you get one additional
> MTD device for each UBI volume, so the number of MTD devices grows
> quite a lot and is a bit difficult to understand. For example,
> mtdblock[0-4] might be your real MTD partitions, while mtdblock[5-9]
> might be your UBI volumes.
> It also means that if a new real MTD
> partition is added, the number of all the MTD devices exposing UBI
> volumes will be incremented by one, which is a bit
> confusing/annoying.
> As well, if you add an UBI volume, the mtdblock devices that are
> emulated on top of volumes that come after this new one will have
> their ID incremented.
>
> * The performance appears to be slightly better with ubiblk than
> gluebi+mtdblock_ro, according to our benchmarks (see
> http://elinux.org/Flash_Filesystem_Benchmarks_2.6.39)
Hi, I am having vacation till the middle of August and I do not have a
possibility to look at UBI/UBIFS/MTD stuff now, sorry. When I come back,
I'll go through my e-mails and respond. Apologies again.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: David Wagner <david.wagner@free-electrons.com>
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
tim.bird@am.sony.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top of UBI
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:14:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311833667.2169.1.camel@koala> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311683250-7921-1-git-send-email-david.wagner@free-electrons.com>
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:27 +0200, David Wagner wrote:
> * The numbering of devices is much easier with ubiblk than with
> gluebi+mtdblock_ro. With gluebi+mtdblock_ro, you get one additional
> MTD device for each UBI volume, so the number of MTD devices grows
> quite a lot and is a bit difficult to understand. For example,
> mtdblock[0-4] might be your real MTD partitions, while mtdblock[5-9]
> might be your UBI volumes.
> It also means that if a new real MTD
> partition is added, the number of all the MTD devices exposing UBI
> volumes will be incremented by one, which is a bit
> confusing/annoying.
> As well, if you add an UBI volume, the mtdblock devices that are
> emulated on top of volumes that come after this new one will have
> their ID incremented.
>
> * The performance appears to be slightly better with ubiblk than
> gluebi+mtdblock_ro, according to our benchmarks (see
> http://elinux.org/Flash_Filesystem_Benchmarks_2.6.39)
Hi, I am having vacation till the middle of August and I do not have a
possibility to look at UBI/UBIFS/MTD stuff now, sorry. When I come back,
I'll go through my e-mails and respond. Apologies again.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-28 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-24 13:34 [RFC] ubiblk: read-only block layer on top of UBI david.wagner
2011-06-24 13:34 ` david.wagner
2011-06-24 13:34 ` [PATCH] UBI: new module ubiblk: " david.wagner
2011-06-24 13:34 ` david.wagner
2011-06-27 19:26 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-27 19:26 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-28 11:35 ` David Wagner
2011-06-28 11:35 ` David Wagner
2011-06-29 6:52 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-29 6:52 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-28 14:50 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-06-28 14:50 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-06-28 15:32 ` David Wagner
2011-06-28 15:32 ` David Wagner
2011-06-29 6:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-29 6:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-24 13:45 ` [Addendum][RFC] ubiblk: read-only " David Wagner
2011-06-27 19:14 ` [RFC] " Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-27 19:14 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-28 15:24 ` [RFC PATCHv2] UBI: new module ubiblk: " david.wagner
2011-06-28 15:24 ` david.wagner
2011-06-28 15:24 ` david.wagner
2011-06-29 6:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-29 6:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-07-26 12:27 ` [PATCH] " David Wagner
2011-07-26 12:27 ` David Wagner
2011-07-26 12:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 12:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 12:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 12:58 ` David Wagner
2011-07-26 12:58 ` David Wagner
2011-07-28 6:14 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2011-07-28 6:14 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 11:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 11:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-17 13:17 ` [PATCHv3] " david.wagner
2011-08-17 13:17 ` david.wagner
2011-08-17 14:20 ` [PATCH] Tools for controling ubiblk David Wagner
2011-08-17 14:20 ` David Wagner
2011-08-22 8:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22 8:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22 7:39 ` [PATCHv3] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top of UBI Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22 7:39 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22 7:42 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22 7:42 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-24 16:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-24 16:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-25 7:06 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-25 7:06 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-25 15:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-25 15:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-25 15:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-01 12:55 ` David Wagner
2011-09-01 12:55 ` David Wagner
2011-09-01 12:55 ` David Wagner
2011-09-06 3:44 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06 3:44 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06 4:10 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06 4:10 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06 4:10 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06 4:29 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06 4:29 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-08 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-08 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-08 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-09 11:53 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 11:53 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 12:02 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 12:02 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 14:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-09 14:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-09 15:27 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 15:27 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 14:41 ` David Wagner
2011-09-09 14:41 ` David Wagner
2011-09-09 14:41 ` David Wagner
2011-09-09 14:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-09 14:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-11 10:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-11 10:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-11 10:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-11 10:35 ` David Wagner
2011-09-11 10:35 ` David Wagner
2011-08-24 16:15 ` [PATCHv4] " david.wagner
2011-08-24 16:15 ` david.wagner
2011-08-24 16:21 ` [PATCH] document ubiblk's usage of the same ioctl magic as a part " David Wagner
2011-08-24 16:21 ` David Wagner
2011-09-06 4:58 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06 4:58 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06 4:55 ` [PATCHv4] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top " Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06 4:55 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-12 9:51 ` [PATCHv5] " David Wagner
2011-09-12 9:51 ` David Wagner
2011-09-12 9:51 ` David Wagner
2011-09-19 4:50 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-19 4:50 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-22 7:58 ` [PATCHv6] " David Wagner
2011-09-22 7:58 ` David Wagner
2011-09-23 10:58 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-23 10:58 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 12:58 ` David Wagner
2011-09-26 12:58 ` David Wagner
2011-09-26 9:17 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-09-26 9:17 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-09-26 9:17 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-09-26 12:11 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-09-26 12:38 ` [PATCHv7] " David Wagner
2011-09-26 12:38 ` David Wagner
2011-09-26 13:20 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 13:20 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 14:25 ` [PATCHv8] " David Wagner
2011-09-26 14:25 ` David Wagner
2011-09-26 14:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 14:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 14:40 ` [PATCHv9] " David Wagner
2011-09-26 14:40 ` David Wagner
2011-10-01 14:08 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-10-01 14:08 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311833667.2169.1.camel@koala \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=david.wagner@free-electrons.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.