All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] cpusets: allow PF_THREAD_BOUND kworkers to escape from a cpuset
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:34:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318224892.6161.45.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316788392.6544.33.camel@marge.simson.net>


Maybe the below (which seems to have been stillborn) should be done to
cgroups as well.  Postmortem: kthreadd is attached to a cgroup with no
rt_runtime allocated, gives birth to severely handicapped kstop threads,
humongous crash dump follows.

Fiddling with kthreadd is user error, but since it makes no sense to
move the thing, why not just say no, and save the user's toes some
needless wear and tear.

> If cpusets doesn't want to let PF_THREAD_BOUND threads out, how about
> cpusets not letting userland scripts attach kthreadd instead?
> 
> cpusets: disallow moving kthreadd into a cpuset.
> 
> If kthreadd is moved into a cpuset, it's child may then acquire
> PF_THREAD_BOUND and become trapped, making it's cpuset immortal.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> index 10131fd..0d9cd04 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include <linux/cgroup.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
>  
>  /*
>   * Workqueue for cpuset related tasks.
> @@ -1382,9 +1383,10 @@ static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont,
>  	 * set of allowed nodes is unnecessary.  Thus, cpusets are not
>  	 * applicable for such threads.  This prevents checking for success of
>  	 * set_cpus_allowed_ptr() on all attached tasks before cpus_allowed may
> -	 * be changed.
> +	 * be changed.  We also disallow attaching kthreadd, to prevent it's
> +	 * child from becoming trapped should it then acquire PF_THREAD_BOUND.
>  	 */
> -	if (tsk->flags & PF_THREAD_BOUND)
> +	if (tsk->flags & PF_THREAD_BOUND || tsk == kthreadd_task)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	return 0;
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-10  5:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-23  6:21 [patch] cpusets: allow PF_THREAD_BOUND kworkers to escape from a cpuset Mike Galbraith
2011-09-23  7:00 ` Li Zefan
2011-09-23  7:19   ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-23  9:12     ` David Rientjes
2011-09-23  9:42       ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-23 10:53         ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-23 13:27           ` David Rientjes
2011-09-23 14:33             ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-23 18:16               ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-23 20:20               ` David Rientjes
2011-09-24  3:21                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-10  5:34               ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2011-10-10  8:03                 ` [patch] cpusets, cgroups: disallow attaching kthreadd Mike Galbraith
2011-10-10 16:43                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-11  2:31                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-10-11 14:08                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-11 16:57                       ` Mike Galbraith
2011-10-12  1:22                         ` David Rientjes
2011-10-12  1:45                           ` Mike Galbraith
2011-10-12  1:20                       ` David Rientjes
2011-10-18  8:10                   ` patch] " Mike Galbraith
2011-10-18  8:16                     ` David Rientjes
2011-10-18  8:42                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-18  8:47                       ` Mike Galbraith
2011-10-18  9:06                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-18  9:23                           ` Mike Galbraith
2011-10-18 10:11                             ` Mike Galbraith
2011-10-18 20:38                               ` David Rientjes
2011-10-19  4:00                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-10-19  4:53                                   ` Paul Menage
2011-10-19  4:56                                     ` Paul Menage
2011-10-19  5:28                                       ` Mike Galbraith
2011-10-19  7:50                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-19 19:47                                   ` David Rientjes
2011-10-20 10:32                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-20 21:24                                       ` David Rientjes
2011-10-19  4:57                     ` Paul Menage
2011-10-19  5:24                       ` [patch-final] " Mike Galbraith
2011-10-19  7:54                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-19  8:00                           ` Paul Menage
2011-10-19  8:21                           ` Mike Galbraith
2011-10-26 20:27                         ` David Rientjes
2011-11-10 20:51                           ` David Rientjes
2011-12-06 20:13                             ` David Rientjes
2011-12-06 22:47                               ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-06 23:53                                 ` David Rientjes
2011-12-07  0:05                                   ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-07  3:18                                   ` [resubmit] " Mike Galbraith
2011-12-07  4:36                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-12-07 22:03                                       ` David Rientjes
2011-12-14 20:16                                         ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-15  2:50                                           ` David Rientjes
2012-01-06 22:06                                       ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-07  6:34                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2012-01-07  7:59                                           ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-07 22:01                                     ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1318224892.6161.45.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=mgalbraith@suse.de \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.