All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>, Daniel Kiper <dkiper@net-space.pl>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] incorrect layout of globals from head_64.S during kexec boot
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:46:34 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341931594.8586.44.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120710141411.GB1791@phenom.dumpdata.com>

On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 10:14 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Which brings me to another question - say we do use this patch, what
> if the decompressor overwrites the old kernels .data section. Won't
> we run into this problem again?

I've not really been following this thread that closely but wouldn't the
right answer be for the original kernel to unmap the shared info on
kexec? Or maybe remap it up to some high/reserved address? Can it read
the original address used by hvmloader at start of day and reuse that?

Ian.



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Daniel Kiper <dkiper@net-space.pl>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] incorrect layout of globals from head_64.S during kexec boot
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:46:34 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341931594.8586.44.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120710141411.GB1791@phenom.dumpdata.com>

On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 10:14 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Which brings me to another question - say we do use this patch, what
> if the decompressor overwrites the old kernels .data section. Won't
> we run into this problem again?

I've not really been following this thread that closely but wouldn't the
right answer be for the original kernel to unmap the shared info on
kexec? Or maybe remap it up to some high/reserved address? Can it read
the original address used by hvmloader at start of day and reuse that?

Ian.



_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-10 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-05 21:06 incorrect layout of globals from head_64.S during kexec boot Olaf Hering
2012-07-05 21:06 ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-06  8:29 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-07-06  8:29   ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-06  8:29   ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-06  8:41 ` Daniel Kiper
2012-07-06  8:41   ` Daniel Kiper
2012-07-06  8:41   ` Daniel Kiper
2012-07-06 12:07   ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-06 12:07     ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-06 12:56     ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-07-06 12:56       ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-06 12:56       ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-06 13:31       ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-06 13:31         ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-06 13:31         ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-06 13:53         ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-06 13:53           ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-06 13:53           ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-06 14:14         ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-06 14:14           ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-06 14:50           ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-06 14:50             ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-06 14:50             ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-06 17:29             ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-06 17:29               ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-10  9:33               ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-10  9:33                 ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-10 14:14                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-10 14:14                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-10 14:46                   ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2012-07-10 14:46                     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-10 14:51                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-10 14:51                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-10 14:51                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-10 15:29                       ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-10 15:29                         ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-10 15:29                         ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-10 15:37                         ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-10 15:37                           ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-10 15:23                   ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-10 15:23                     ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-10 17:26                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-10 17:26                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-10 17:26                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-10 18:09                       ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-10 18:09                         ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-10 18:32                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-10 18:32                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-10 19:08                         ` Keir Fraser
2012-07-10 19:08                           ` Keir Fraser
2012-07-10 19:08                           ` Keir Fraser
2012-07-13 20:20                           ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-13 20:20                             ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-14  4:54                             ` Keir Fraser
2012-07-14  4:54                               ` Keir Fraser
2012-07-14  4:54                               ` Keir Fraser
2012-07-15 16:06                           ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-15 16:06                             ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-15 17:17                             ` Keir Fraser
2012-07-15 17:17                               ` Keir Fraser
2012-07-15 17:17                               ` Keir Fraser
2012-07-16 15:46                             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-16 15:46                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-17 10:24                               ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-17 10:24                                 ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-17 12:34                                 ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-17 12:34                                   ` Olaf Hering
2012-07-06 15:54     ` Daniel Kiper
2012-07-06 15:54       ` Daniel Kiper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1341931594.8586.44.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=dkiper@net-space.pl \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.