All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RFC - showing 0 values in tables
@ 2014-03-21 16:27 Barros Pena, Belen
  2014-03-22 10:17 ` Stanacar, StefanX
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Barros Pena, Belen @ 2014-03-21 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: toaster

It has been brought to my attention that, since a value 0 is not the same
as value none, we should maybe show 0 values in the task performance
information. 

Although I understand that none is not 0, I still think that, in the case
of task performance information, if the value is 0 I don't need to care
about it, since the task is not consuming any resources. If I don't need
to care about it, why are you showing it to me? I am of the minimalistic
kind.

Having said that, I am happy with both options. I have made the necessary
changes and pushed them to

bbarrosp/show-zeros

so that you can see how it looks like. If you feel strongly one way or
another, please speak out.

Thanks!

Belén






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: RFC - showing 0 values in tables
  2014-03-21 16:27 RFC - showing 0 values in tables Barros Pena, Belen
@ 2014-03-22 10:17 ` Stanacar, StefanX
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stanacar, StefanX @ 2014-03-22 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: toaster

On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 16:27 +0000, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
> It has been brought to my attention that, since a value 0 is not the same
> as value none, we should maybe show 0 values in the task performance
> information. 
> 
> Although I understand that none is not 0, I still think that, in the case
> of task performance information, if the value is 0 I don't need to care
> about it, since the task is not consuming any resources. If I don't need
> to care about it, why are you showing it to me? I am of the minimalistic
> kind.
> 

FWIW, as a user I don't want to see 0 values and see no point in showing
them, especially if the task doesn't actually use resources. But then
again, I prefer minimalist design too.
For those who do want to see these values, perhaps in the future we
could provide a "best of both worlds" solution, some option for: "okay,
give me all the raw data you have". And I wouldn't mind if it would just
be simple, unformatted text that I open in a new tab.


Cheers,
Stefan


> Having said that, I am happy with both options. I have made the necessary
> changes and pushed them to
> 
> bbarrosp/show-zeros
> 
> so that you can see how it looks like. If you feel strongly one way or
> another, please speak out.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Belén
> 
> 
> 
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-22 10:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-21 16:27 RFC - showing 0 values in tables Barros Pena, Belen
2014-03-22 10:17 ` Stanacar, StefanX

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.