All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] rtc: max77686: Fail to probe if no RTC regmap irqchip is set
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:21:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409217715.20020.7.camel@AMDC1943> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408350877-15921-4-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>

On pon, 2014-08-18 at 10:34 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The max77686 mfd driver adds a regmap IRQ chip which creates an
> IRQ domain that is used to map the virtual RTC alarm1 interrupt.
> 
> The RTC driver assumes that this will always be true since the
> PMIC IRQ is a required property according to the max77686 DT
> binding doc. If an "interrupts" property is not defined for a
> max77686 PMIC, then the mfd probe function will fail and the
> RTC platform driver will never be probed. But even when it is
> not possible to probe the rtc-max77686 driver without a regmap
> IRQ chip, it's better to explicitly check if the IRQ chip data
> is not NULL and gracefully fail instead of getting an OOPS.

The OOPS was possible only with Bartlomiej's patch because he changed
the MFD driver probe function to skip IRQ setup on lack of interrupts.
In current state the OOPS should not happen so mentioning OOPS in commit
message may be misleading. Maybe just don't put the OOPS here?

Anyway the patch looks good and a check for non-null
regmap_irq_chip_data is still a valid precaution so:

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof


> 
> Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
> ---
> 
> Fixes the issue reported by Krzystof in: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/8/121
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
> index 7bb5433..55396bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
> @@ -466,6 +466,12 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto err_rtc;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!max77686->rtc_irq_data) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: no RTC regmap IRQ chip\n", __func__);
> +		goto err_rtc;
> +	}
> +
>  	info->virq = regmap_irq_get_virq(max77686->rtc_irq_data,
>  					 MAX77686_RTCIRQ_RTCA1);
>  	if (!info->virq) {


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 3/5] rtc: max77686: Fail to probe if no RTC regmap irqchip is set
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:21:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409217715.20020.7.camel@AMDC1943> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408350877-15921-4-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>

On pon, 2014-08-18 at 10:34 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The max77686 mfd driver adds a regmap IRQ chip which creates an
> IRQ domain that is used to map the virtual RTC alarm1 interrupt.
> 
> The RTC driver assumes that this will always be true since the
> PMIC IRQ is a required property according to the max77686 DT
> binding doc. If an "interrupts" property is not defined for a
> max77686 PMIC, then the mfd probe function will fail and the
> RTC platform driver will never be probed. But even when it is
> not possible to probe the rtc-max77686 driver without a regmap
> IRQ chip, it's better to explicitly check if the IRQ chip data
> is not NULL and gracefully fail instead of getting an OOPS.

The OOPS was possible only with Bartlomiej's patch because he changed
the MFD driver probe function to skip IRQ setup on lack of interrupts.
In current state the OOPS should not happen so mentioning OOPS in commit
message may be misleading. Maybe just don't put the OOPS here?

Anyway the patch looks good and a check for non-null
regmap_irq_chip_data is still a valid precaution so:

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof


> 
> Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
> ---
> 
> Fixes the issue reported by Krzystof in: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/8/121
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
> index 7bb5433..55396bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
> @@ -466,6 +466,12 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto err_rtc;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!max77686->rtc_irq_data) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: no RTC regmap IRQ chip\n", __func__);
> +		goto err_rtc;
> +	}
> +
>  	info->virq = regmap_irq_get_virq(max77686->rtc_irq_data,
>  					 MAX77686_RTCIRQ_RTCA1);
>  	if (!info->virq) {

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-28  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-18  8:34 [PATCH v9 0/5] Add Maxim 77802 RTC support Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-18  8:34 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-18  8:34 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-18  8:34 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] rtc: max77686: Allow the max77686 rtc to wakeup the system Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-18  8:34   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-18  8:34 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] rtc: max77686: Remove dead code for SMPL and WTSR Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-18  8:34   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-18  8:34 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] rtc: max77686: Fail to probe if no RTC regmap irqchip is set Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-18  8:34   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-28  9:21   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2014-08-28  9:21     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-09-08  6:50     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-09-08  6:50       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-18  8:34 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] rtc: max77686: Remove unneded info log Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-18  8:34   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-28  8:36   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-08-28  8:36     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-08-18  8:34 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] rtc: Add driver for Maxim 77802 PMIC Real-Time-Clock Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-18  8:34   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-09-08  6:48 ` [PATCH v9 0/5] Add Maxim 77802 RTC support Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-09-08  6:48   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-09-08  6:48   ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1409217715.20020.7.camel@AMDC1943 \
    --to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.