Re: [PATCH] tun: orphan an skb on tx

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 938 bytes --]

On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 16:19 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 07:27:10 +0000
> 
> > I'm guessing you don't want to push the *whole* management of the TLS
> > control connection *and* the UDP transport, and probing the latter with
> > keepalives, into the kernel? I certainly don't :)
> 
> Whilst Herbert Xu and I have discussed in the past supporting
> automatic SSL handling of socket data during socket writes in the
> kernel, doing TLS stuff would be a bit of a stretch :-)

Right. For the DTLS I was thinking we'd do the handshake in userspace
and then hand the UDP socket down. At that point it's basically the same
as ESP with the bytes in a slightly different place.

So I really am looking at an option for "here's a UDP socket to send
those tun packets out on, with <this> encryption setup" as the sanest
plan I can come up with.

-- 
dwmw2


[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5745 bytes --]