All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>
To: "Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, <ted.lin@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt8173: add clock_null
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 10:05:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435802722.3526.13.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150701064935.GC18611@pengutronix.de>

Hi Sascha,

On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 08:49 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 05:07:09PM +0800, James Liao wrote:
> > There are 4 clocks which are derived from clk_null directly in current
> > topckgen implementation:
> > 
> > 	clkph_mck_o, dpi_ck, usb_syspll_125m, hdmitx_dig_cts
> > 
> > Our designer mentioned 2 things about external clocks:
> > 
> > 1. These 4 clocks come from analog macro, not from PLL, nor from
> > external clocks directly.
> 
> Ok, this means there actually are clocks. We can't control these clock and
> they have some known or unknown rate. This makes them fixed clocks. Just
> specify them in the device tree and you are done. Give them reasonable
> names and the rate if you know it, 0 otherwise.
> 
> The problem is not that you use fixed clocks for non software
> controllable clocks of unknwown rates, but that you try to use a single
> clock for all of them and name it 'dummy' or 'null'. Name it
> 
> dpi_ck {
> 	compatible = "fixed-clock";
> 	rate = <0>; /* unknown, generated by some Analog block */
> };
> 
> Technically it's the same, but it sounds much more professional and like
> you know what you are doing ;)

These clocks are SoC internal clocks. Is it suitable to specify them in
the device tree?

According to your and Heiko's suggestion, it looks the best way should
be specifying these clocks in the driver code without a dummy parent.
i.e.:

Original code:

FACTOR(CLK_TOP_CLKPH_MCK_O, "clkph_mck_o", "clk_null", 1, 1),
FACTOR(CLK_TOP_DPI, "dpi_ck", "clk_null", 1, 1),
FACTOR(CLK_TOP_USB_SYSPLL_125M, "usb_syspll_125m", "clk_null", 1, 1),
FACTOR(CLK_TOP_HDMITX_DIG_CTS, "hdmitx_dig_cts", "clk_null", 1, 1),

New code:

FIXED(CLK_TOP_CLKPH_MCK_O, "clkph_mck_o", UNKNOWN_RATE),
FIXED(CLK_TOP_DPI, "dpi_ck", UNKNOWN_RATE),
FIXED(CLK_TOP_USB_SYSPLL_125M, "usb_syspll_125m", UNKNOWN_RATE),
FIXED(CLK_TOP_HDMITX_DIG_CTS, "hdmitx_dig_cts", UNKNOWN_RATE),

Then we don't need to specify a dummy clock such as clk_null in device
tree.


Best regards,

James


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Liao <jamesjj.liao-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: "Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Heiko Stübner" <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	Eddie Huang <eddie.huang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Matthias Brugger
	<matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	djkurtz-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	Mike Turquette
	<mturquette-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
	ted.lin-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt8173: add clock_null
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 10:05:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435802722.3526.13.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150701064935.GC18611-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>

Hi Sascha,

On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 08:49 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 05:07:09PM +0800, James Liao wrote:
> > There are 4 clocks which are derived from clk_null directly in current
> > topckgen implementation:
> > 
> > 	clkph_mck_o, dpi_ck, usb_syspll_125m, hdmitx_dig_cts
> > 
> > Our designer mentioned 2 things about external clocks:
> > 
> > 1. These 4 clocks come from analog macro, not from PLL, nor from
> > external clocks directly.
> 
> Ok, this means there actually are clocks. We can't control these clock and
> they have some known or unknown rate. This makes them fixed clocks. Just
> specify them in the device tree and you are done. Give them reasonable
> names and the rate if you know it, 0 otherwise.
> 
> The problem is not that you use fixed clocks for non software
> controllable clocks of unknwown rates, but that you try to use a single
> clock for all of them and name it 'dummy' or 'null'. Name it
> 
> dpi_ck {
> 	compatible = "fixed-clock";
> 	rate = <0>; /* unknown, generated by some Analog block */
> };
> 
> Technically it's the same, but it sounds much more professional and like
> you know what you are doing ;)

These clocks are SoC internal clocks. Is it suitable to specify them in
the device tree?

According to your and Heiko's suggestion, it looks the best way should
be specifying these clocks in the driver code without a dummy parent.
i.e.:

Original code:

FACTOR(CLK_TOP_CLKPH_MCK_O, "clkph_mck_o", "clk_null", 1, 1),
FACTOR(CLK_TOP_DPI, "dpi_ck", "clk_null", 1, 1),
FACTOR(CLK_TOP_USB_SYSPLL_125M, "usb_syspll_125m", "clk_null", 1, 1),
FACTOR(CLK_TOP_HDMITX_DIG_CTS, "hdmitx_dig_cts", "clk_null", 1, 1),

New code:

FIXED(CLK_TOP_CLKPH_MCK_O, "clkph_mck_o", UNKNOWN_RATE),
FIXED(CLK_TOP_DPI, "dpi_ck", UNKNOWN_RATE),
FIXED(CLK_TOP_USB_SYSPLL_125M, "usb_syspll_125m", UNKNOWN_RATE),
FIXED(CLK_TOP_HDMITX_DIG_CTS, "hdmitx_dig_cts", UNKNOWN_RATE),

Then we don't need to specify a dummy clock such as clk_null in device
tree.


Best regards,

James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com (James Liao)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt8173: add clock_null
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 10:05:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435802722.3526.13.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150701064935.GC18611@pengutronix.de>

Hi Sascha,

On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 08:49 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 05:07:09PM +0800, James Liao wrote:
> > There are 4 clocks which are derived from clk_null directly in current
> > topckgen implementation:
> > 
> > 	clkph_mck_o, dpi_ck, usb_syspll_125m, hdmitx_dig_cts
> > 
> > Our designer mentioned 2 things about external clocks:
> > 
> > 1. These 4 clocks come from analog macro, not from PLL, nor from
> > external clocks directly.
> 
> Ok, this means there actually are clocks. We can't control these clock and
> they have some known or unknown rate. This makes them fixed clocks. Just
> specify them in the device tree and you are done. Give them reasonable
> names and the rate if you know it, 0 otherwise.
> 
> The problem is not that you use fixed clocks for non software
> controllable clocks of unknwown rates, but that you try to use a single
> clock for all of them and name it 'dummy' or 'null'. Name it
> 
> dpi_ck {
> 	compatible = "fixed-clock";
> 	rate = <0>; /* unknown, generated by some Analog block */
> };
> 
> Technically it's the same, but it sounds much more professional and like
> you know what you are doing ;)

These clocks are SoC internal clocks. Is it suitable to specify them in
the device tree?

According to your and Heiko's suggestion, it looks the best way should
be specifying these clocks in the driver code without a dummy parent.
i.e.:

Original code:

FACTOR(CLK_TOP_CLKPH_MCK_O, "clkph_mck_o", "clk_null", 1, 1),
FACTOR(CLK_TOP_DPI, "dpi_ck", "clk_null", 1, 1),
FACTOR(CLK_TOP_USB_SYSPLL_125M, "usb_syspll_125m", "clk_null", 1, 1),
FACTOR(CLK_TOP_HDMITX_DIG_CTS, "hdmitx_dig_cts", "clk_null", 1, 1),

New code:

FIXED(CLK_TOP_CLKPH_MCK_O, "clkph_mck_o", UNKNOWN_RATE),
FIXED(CLK_TOP_DPI, "dpi_ck", UNKNOWN_RATE),
FIXED(CLK_TOP_USB_SYSPLL_125M, "usb_syspll_125m", UNKNOWN_RATE),
FIXED(CLK_TOP_HDMITX_DIG_CTS, "hdmitx_dig_cts", UNKNOWN_RATE),

Then we don't need to specify a dummy clock such as clk_null in device
tree.


Best regards,

James

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-02  2:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-18  5:29 [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt8173: add clock_null Eddie Huang
2015-06-18  5:29 ` Eddie Huang
2015-06-18  5:29 ` Eddie Huang
2015-06-18 16:15 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-06-18 16:15   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-06-18 16:15   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-06-19 11:36   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-06-19 11:36     ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-06-19 11:36     ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-06-22  3:38     ` James Liao
2015-06-22  3:38       ` James Liao
2015-06-22  3:38       ` James Liao
2015-06-22 12:53       ` Heiko Stübner
2015-06-22 12:53         ` Heiko Stübner
2015-06-22 12:53         ` Heiko Stübner
2015-06-24  7:54         ` James Liao
2015-06-24  7:54           ` James Liao
2015-06-24  7:54           ` James Liao
2015-06-24 10:24           ` Heiko Stübner
2015-06-24 10:24             ` Heiko Stübner
2015-06-24 10:24             ` Heiko Stübner
2015-06-30  9:07             ` James Liao
2015-06-30  9:07               ` James Liao
2015-06-30  9:07               ` James Liao
2015-07-01  6:49               ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-01  6:49                 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-01  6:49                 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-01 11:54                 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-01 11:54                   ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-02  3:06                   ` James Liao
2015-07-02  3:06                     ` James Liao
2015-07-02  3:06                     ` James Liao
2015-07-02  4:23                     ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-02  4:23                       ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-02  4:23                       ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-03  7:45                       ` James Liao
2015-07-03  7:45                         ` James Liao
2015-07-03  7:45                         ` James Liao
2015-07-03  8:38                         ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-03  8:38                           ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-03  8:38                           ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-02  2:05                 ` James Liao [this message]
2015-07-02  2:05                   ` James Liao
2015-07-02  2:05                   ` James Liao
2015-07-07 13:07 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-07 13:07   ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-07 13:07   ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-07 14:15   ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-07 14:15     ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-07 14:15     ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-07 14:36     ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-07 14:36       ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-07 14:36       ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-07 15:10       ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-07 15:10         ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-07 15:10         ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-08  2:37         ` Eddie Huang
2015-07-08  2:37           ` Eddie Huang
2015-07-08  2:37           ` Eddie Huang
2015-07-08  5:44           ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-08  5:44             ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-08  5:44             ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-10  7:27             ` Eddie Huang
2015-07-10  7:27               ` Eddie Huang
2015-07-10  8:11               ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-10  8:11                 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-10 10:29                 ` Eddie Huang
2015-07-10 10:29                   ` Eddie Huang
2015-07-10 10:29                   ` Eddie Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1435802722.3526.13.camel@mtksdaap41 \
    --to=jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
    --cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ted.lin@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.