All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 11/11] xfs: move reclaim tagging functions
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:31:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460525492-1170-12-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460525492-1170-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Rearrange the inode tagging functions so that they are higher up in
xfs_cache.c and so there is no need for forward prototypes to be
defined. This is purely code movement, no other change.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 235 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index 927e7b0..dab58e1 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -37,8 +37,6 @@
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/freezer.h>
 
-STATIC void xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_perag *pag, xfs_ino_t ino);
-
 /*
  * Allocate and initialise an xfs_inode.
  */
@@ -172,6 +170,122 @@ xfs_reinit_inode(
 }
 
 /*
+ * Queue a new inode reclaim pass if there are reclaimable inodes and there
+ * isn't a reclaim pass already in progress. By default it runs every 5s based
+ * on the xfs periodic sync default of 30s. Perhaps this should have it's own
+ * tunable, but that can be done if this method proves to be ineffective or too
+ * aggressive.
+ */
+static void
+xfs_reclaim_work_queue(
+	struct xfs_mount        *mp)
+{
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	if (radix_tree_tagged(&mp->m_perag_tree, XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG)) {
+		queue_delayed_work(mp->m_reclaim_workqueue, &mp->m_reclaim_work,
+			msecs_to_jiffies(xfs_syncd_centisecs / 6 * 10));
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+/*
+ * This is a fast pass over the inode cache to try to get reclaim moving on as
+ * many inodes as possible in a short period of time. It kicks itself every few
+ * seconds, as well as being kicked by the inode cache shrinker when memory
+ * goes low. It scans as quickly as possible avoiding locked inodes or those
+ * already being flushed, and once done schedules a future pass.
+ */
+void
+xfs_reclaim_worker(
+	struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct xfs_mount *mp = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
+					struct xfs_mount, m_reclaim_work);
+
+	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, SYNC_TRYLOCK);
+	xfs_reclaim_work_queue(mp);
+}
+
+static void
+xfs_perag_set_reclaim_tag(
+	struct xfs_perag	*pag,
+	xfs_ino_t		ino)
+{
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp = pag->pag_mount;
+
+	ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&pag->pag_ici_lock));
+	if (pag->pag_ici_reclaimable++)
+		return;
+
+	/* propagate the reclaim tag up into the perag radix tree */
+	spin_lock(&mp->m_perag_lock);
+	radix_tree_tag_set(&mp->m_perag_tree, pag->pag_agno,
+			   XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
+	spin_unlock(&mp->m_perag_lock);
+
+	/* schedule periodic background inode reclaim */
+	xfs_reclaim_work_queue(mp);
+
+	trace_xfs_perag_set_reclaim(mp, pag->pag_agno, -1, _RET_IP_);
+}
+
+static void
+xfs_perag_clear_reclaim_tag(
+	struct xfs_perag	*pag)
+{
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp = pag->pag_mount;
+
+	ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&pag->pag_ici_lock));
+	if (--pag->pag_ici_reclaimable)
+		return;
+
+	/* clear the reclaim tag from the perag radix tree */
+	spin_lock(&mp->m_perag_lock);
+	radix_tree_tag_clear(&mp->m_perag_tree, pag->pag_agno,
+			     XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
+	spin_unlock(&mp->m_perag_lock);
+	trace_xfs_perag_clear_reclaim(mp, pag->pag_agno, -1, _RET_IP_);
+}
+
+/*
+ * We set the inode flag atomically with the radix tree tag.
+ * Once we get tag lookups on the radix tree, this inode flag
+ * can go away.
+ */
+void
+xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip)
+{
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
+	struct xfs_perag	*pag;
+
+	pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino));
+	spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+	spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+
+	radix_tree_tag_set(&pag->pag_ici_root, XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino),
+			   XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
+	xfs_perag_set_reclaim_tag(pag, ip->i_ino);
+	__xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE);
+
+	spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+	xfs_perag_put(pag);
+}
+
+static void
+xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(
+	struct xfs_perag	*pag,
+	xfs_ino_t		ino)
+{
+	radix_tree_tag_clear(&pag->pag_ici_root,
+			     XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(pag->pag_mount, ino),
+			     XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
+	xfs_perag_clear_reclaim_tag(pag);
+}
+
+/*
  * Check the validity of the inode we just found it the cache
  */
 static int
@@ -729,123 +843,6 @@ xfs_inode_ag_iterator_tag(
 }
 
 /*
- * Queue a new inode reclaim pass if there are reclaimable inodes and there
- * isn't a reclaim pass already in progress. By default it runs every 5s based
- * on the xfs periodic sync default of 30s. Perhaps this should have it's own
- * tunable, but that can be done if this method proves to be ineffective or too
- * aggressive.
- */
-static void
-xfs_reclaim_work_queue(
-	struct xfs_mount        *mp)
-{
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	if (radix_tree_tagged(&mp->m_perag_tree, XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG)) {
-		queue_delayed_work(mp->m_reclaim_workqueue, &mp->m_reclaim_work,
-			msecs_to_jiffies(xfs_syncd_centisecs / 6 * 10));
-	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-}
-
-/*
- * This is a fast pass over the inode cache to try to get reclaim moving on as
- * many inodes as possible in a short period of time. It kicks itself every few
- * seconds, as well as being kicked by the inode cache shrinker when memory
- * goes low. It scans as quickly as possible avoiding locked inodes or those
- * already being flushed, and once done schedules a future pass.
- */
-void
-xfs_reclaim_worker(
-	struct work_struct *work)
-{
-	struct xfs_mount *mp = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
-					struct xfs_mount, m_reclaim_work);
-
-	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, SYNC_TRYLOCK);
-	xfs_reclaim_work_queue(mp);
-}
-
-static void
-xfs_perag_set_reclaim_tag(
-	struct xfs_perag	*pag,
-	xfs_ino_t		ino)
-{
-	struct xfs_mount	*mp = pag->pag_mount;
-
-	ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&pag->pag_ici_lock));
-	if (pag->pag_ici_reclaimable++)
-		return;
-
-	/* propagate the reclaim tag up into the perag radix tree */
-	spin_lock(&mp->m_perag_lock);
-	radix_tree_tag_set(&mp->m_perag_tree, pag->pag_agno,
-			   XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
-	spin_unlock(&mp->m_perag_lock);
-
-	/* schedule periodic background inode reclaim */
-	xfs_reclaim_work_queue(mp);
-
-	trace_xfs_perag_set_reclaim(mp, pag->pag_agno, -1, _RET_IP_);
-}
-
-static void
-xfs_perag_clear_reclaim_tag(
-	struct xfs_perag	*pag)
-{
-	struct xfs_mount	*mp = pag->pag_mount;
-
-	ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&pag->pag_ici_lock));
-	if (--pag->pag_ici_reclaimable)
-		return;
-
-	/* clear the reclaim tag from the perag radix tree */
-	spin_lock(&mp->m_perag_lock);
-	radix_tree_tag_clear(&mp->m_perag_tree, pag->pag_agno,
-			     XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
-	spin_unlock(&mp->m_perag_lock);
-	trace_xfs_perag_clear_reclaim(mp, pag->pag_agno, -1, _RET_IP_);
-}
-
-/*
- * We set the inode flag atomically with the radix tree tag.
- * Once we get tag lookups on the radix tree, this inode flag
- * can go away.
- */
-void
-xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(
-	struct xfs_inode	*ip)
-{
-	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
-	struct xfs_perag	*pag;
-
-	pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino));
-	spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-	spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
-
-	radix_tree_tag_set(&pag->pag_ici_root, XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino),
-			   XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
-	xfs_perag_set_reclaim_tag(pag, ip->i_ino);
-	__xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE);
-
-	spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
-	spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-	xfs_perag_put(pag);
-}
-
-
-STATIC void
-xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(
-	struct xfs_perag	*pag,
-	xfs_ino_t		ino)
-{
-	radix_tree_tag_clear(&pag->pag_ici_root,
-			     XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(pag->pag_mount, ino),
-			     XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
-	xfs_perag_clear_reclaim_tag(pag);
-}
-
-/*
  * Grab the inode for reclaim exclusively.
  * Return 0 if we grabbed it, non-zero otherwise.
  */
-- 
2.7.0

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-13  5:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-13  5:31 [PATCH 00/11 v3] xfs: inode reclaim vs the world Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: we don't need no steekin ->evict_inode Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 16:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-13 21:20     ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-14 12:10   ` Brian Foster
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster fails to abort on error Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 16:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: fix inode validity check in xfs_iflush_cluster Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: skip stale inodes " Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: optimise xfs_iext_destroy Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 16:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: xfs_inode_free() isn't RCU safe Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: mark reclaimed inodes invalid earlier Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  6:49   ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-14 12:10     ` Brian Foster
2016-04-14 23:31       ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-15 12:46         ` Brian Foster
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster has range issues Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: rename variables in xfs_iflush_cluster for clarity Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: simplify inode reclaim tagging interfaces Dave Chinner
2016-04-14 12:10   ` Brian Foster
2016-06-29  4:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-04-13  5:31 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-04-14 12:11   ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: move reclaim tagging functions Brian Foster
2016-04-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 00/11 v3] xfs: inode reclaim vs the world Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1460525492-1170-12-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.