All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] xfs: optimise xfs_iext_destroy
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:45:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160413164510.GC8475@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460525492-1170-6-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

>  /*
> + * Remove all records from the indirection array.
> + */
> +STATIC void
> +xfs_iext_irec_remove_all(
> +	struct xfs_ifork *ifp)
> +{
> +	int		nlists;
> +	int		i;
> +
> +	ASSERT(ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTIREC);
> +	nlists = ifp->if_real_bytes / XFS_IEXT_BUFSZ;
> +	for (i = 0; i < nlists; i++) {
> +		xfs_ext_irec_t *erp = &ifp->if_u1.if_ext_irec[i];

Can we avoid the typedef for new code?

> +		if (erp->er_extbuf)
> +			kmem_free(erp->er_extbuf);

no need to check for NULL before a kmem_free, e.g. this whole loop could
just be:

	for (i = 0; i < nlists; i++)
		kmem_free(ifp->if_u1.if_ext_irec[i].er_extbuf);

>  {
>  	if (ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTIREC) {
> -		int	erp_idx;
> -		int	nlists;
> -
> -		nlists = ifp->if_real_bytes / XFS_IEXT_BUFSZ;
> -		for (erp_idx = nlists - 1; erp_idx >= 0 ; erp_idx--) {
> -			xfs_iext_irec_remove(ifp, erp_idx);
> -		}
> +		xfs_iext_irec_remove_all(ifp);
>  		ifp->if_flags &= ~XFS_IFEXTIREC;

I'd be tempted to just move clearing of the flag into
xfs_iext_irec_remove_all if we change the patch anyway.

Otherwise this looks fine to me.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-13 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-13  5:31 [PATCH 00/11 v3] xfs: inode reclaim vs the world Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: we don't need no steekin ->evict_inode Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 16:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-13 21:20     ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-14 12:10   ` Brian Foster
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster fails to abort on error Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 16:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: fix inode validity check in xfs_iflush_cluster Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: skip stale inodes " Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: optimise xfs_iext_destroy Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 16:45   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: xfs_inode_free() isn't RCU safe Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: mark reclaimed inodes invalid earlier Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  6:49   ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-14 12:10     ` Brian Foster
2016-04-14 23:31       ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-15 12:46         ` Brian Foster
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster has range issues Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: rename variables in xfs_iflush_cluster for clarity Dave Chinner
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: simplify inode reclaim tagging interfaces Dave Chinner
2016-04-14 12:10   ` Brian Foster
2016-06-29  4:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-04-13  5:31 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: move reclaim tagging functions Dave Chinner
2016-04-14 12:11   ` Brian Foster
2016-04-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 00/11 v3] xfs: inode reclaim vs the world Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160413164510.GC8475@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.