* [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI
2016-06-01 20:25 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI Paolo Bonzini
@ 2016-06-01 20:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-01 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: rename process_smi to enter_smm, process_smi_request to process_smi Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-02 14:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI Radim Krčmář
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-06-01 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, kvm; +Cc: stable
If the processor exits to KVM while delivering an interrupt,
the hypervisor then requeues the interrupt for the next vmentry.
Trying to enter SMM in this same window causes to enter non-root
mode in emulated SMM (i.e. with IF=0) and with a request to
inject an IRQ (i.e. with a valid VM-entry interrupt info field).
This is invalid guest state (SDM 26.3.1.4 "Check on Guest RIP
and RFLAGS") and the processor fails vmentry.
The fix is to defer the injection from KVM_REQ_SMI to KVM_REQ_EVENT,
like we already do for e.g. NMIs. This patch doesn't change the
name of the process_smi function so that it can be applied to
stable releases. The next patch will modify the names so that
process_nmi and process_smi handle respectively KVM_REQ_NMI and
KVM_REQ_SMI.
This is especially common with Windows, probably due to the
self-IPI trick that it uses to deliver deferred procedure
calls (DPCs).
Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Michał Zegan <webczat_200@poczta.onet.pl>
Fixes: 64d6067057d9658acb8675afcfba549abdb7fc16
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
v1->v2: use assignment instead of -- [Radim]
Clear smi_pending on reset [Radim]
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index f11d377916fc..13e73a8badda 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ static u64 __read_mostly efer_reserved_bits = ~((u64)EFER_SCE);
static void update_cr8_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
static void process_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
static void __kvm_set_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags);
struct kvm_x86_ops *kvm_x86_ops __read_mostly;
@@ -5301,13 +5302,8 @@ static void kvm_smm_changed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* This is a good place to trace that we are exiting SMM. */
trace_kvm_enter_smm(vcpu->vcpu_id, vcpu->arch.smbase, false);
- if (unlikely(vcpu->arch.smi_pending)) {
- kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SMI, vcpu);
- vcpu->arch.smi_pending = 0;
- } else {
- /* Process a latched INIT, if any. */
- kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
- }
+ /* Process a latched INIT or SMI, if any. */
+ kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
}
kvm_mmu_reset_context(vcpu);
@@ -6107,7 +6103,10 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool req_int_win)
}
/* try to inject new event if pending */
- if (vcpu->arch.nmi_pending && kvm_x86_ops->nmi_allowed(vcpu)) {
+ if (vcpu->arch.smi_pending && !is_smm(vcpu)) {
+ vcpu->arch.smi_pending = false;
+ process_smi(vcpu);
+ } else if (vcpu->arch.nmi_pending && kvm_x86_ops->nmi_allowed(vcpu)) {
--vcpu->arch.nmi_pending;
vcpu->arch.nmi_injected = true;
kvm_x86_ops->set_nmi(vcpu);
@@ -6317,11 +6316,6 @@ static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
char buf[512];
u32 cr0;
- if (is_smm(vcpu)) {
- vcpu->arch.smi_pending = true;
- return;
- }
-
trace_kvm_enter_smm(vcpu->vcpu_id, vcpu->arch.smbase, true);
vcpu->arch.hflags |= HF_SMM_MASK;
memset(buf, 0, 512);
@@ -6384,6 +6378,12 @@ static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_mmu_reset_context(vcpu);
}
+static void process_smi_request(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ vcpu->arch.smi_pending = true;
+ kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
+}
+
void kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request(struct kvm *kvm)
{
kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_SCAN_IOAPIC);
@@ -6505,7 +6505,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_STEAL_UPDATE, vcpu))
record_steal_time(vcpu);
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SMI, vcpu))
- process_smi(vcpu);
+ process_smi_request(vcpu);
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_NMI, vcpu))
process_nmi(vcpu);
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_PMU, vcpu))
@@ -6578,8 +6578,18 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (inject_pending_event(vcpu, req_int_win) != 0)
req_immediate_exit = true;
- /* enable NMI/IRQ window open exits if needed */
else {
+ /* Enable NMI/IRQ window open exits if needed.
+ *
+ * SMIs have two cases: 1) they can be nested, and
+ * then there is nothing to do here because RSM will
+ * cause a vmexit anyway; 2) or the SMI can be pending
+ * because inject_pending_event has completed the
+ * injection of an IRQ or NMI from the previous vmexit,
+ * and then we request an immediate exit to inject the SMI.
+ */
+ if (vcpu->arch.smi_pending && !is_smm(vcpu))
+ req_immediate_exit = true;
if (vcpu->arch.nmi_pending)
kvm_x86_ops->enable_nmi_window(vcpu);
if (kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr(vcpu) || req_int_win)
@@ -6630,8 +6640,10 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_load_guest_xcr0(vcpu);
- if (req_immediate_exit)
+ if (req_immediate_exit) {
+ kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
smp_send_reschedule(vcpu->cpu);
+ }
trace_kvm_entry(vcpu->vcpu_id);
wait_lapic_expire(vcpu);
@@ -7432,6 +7444,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
{
vcpu->arch.hflags = 0;
+ vcpu->arch.smi_pending = 0;
atomic_set(&vcpu->arch.nmi_queued, 0);
vcpu->arch.nmi_pending = 0;
vcpu->arch.nmi_injected = false;
--
2.5.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: rename process_smi to enter_smm, process_smi_request to process_smi
2016-06-01 20:25 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-01 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Paolo Bonzini
@ 2016-06-01 20:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-02 14:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI Radim Krčmář
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-06-01 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, kvm
Make the function names more similar between KVM_REQ_NMI and KVM_REQ_SMI.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 13e73a8badda..9b5a25fb7fa1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static u64 __read_mostly efer_reserved_bits = ~((u64)EFER_SCE);
static void update_cr8_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
static void process_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+static void enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
static void __kvm_set_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags);
struct kvm_x86_ops *kvm_x86_ops __read_mostly;
@@ -6105,7 +6105,7 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool req_int_win)
/* try to inject new event if pending */
if (vcpu->arch.smi_pending && !is_smm(vcpu)) {
vcpu->arch.smi_pending = false;
- process_smi(vcpu);
+ enter_smm(vcpu);
} else if (vcpu->arch.nmi_pending && kvm_x86_ops->nmi_allowed(vcpu)) {
--vcpu->arch.nmi_pending;
vcpu->arch.nmi_injected = true;
@@ -6129,6 +6129,7 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool req_int_win)
kvm_x86_ops->set_irq(vcpu);
}
}
+
return 0;
}
@@ -6152,7 +6153,7 @@ static void process_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
#define put_smstate(type, buf, offset, val) \
*(type *)((buf) + (offset) - 0x7e00) = val
-static u32 process_smi_get_segment_flags(struct kvm_segment *seg)
+static u32 enter_smm_get_segment_flags(struct kvm_segment *seg)
{
u32 flags = 0;
flags |= seg->g << 23;
@@ -6166,7 +6167,7 @@ static u32 process_smi_get_segment_flags(struct kvm_segment *seg)
return flags;
}
-static void process_smi_save_seg_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
+static void enter_smm_save_seg_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
{
struct kvm_segment seg;
int offset;
@@ -6181,11 +6182,11 @@ static void process_smi_save_seg_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
put_smstate(u32, buf, offset + 8, seg.base);
put_smstate(u32, buf, offset + 4, seg.limit);
- put_smstate(u32, buf, offset, process_smi_get_segment_flags(&seg));
+ put_smstate(u32, buf, offset, enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg));
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-static void process_smi_save_seg_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
+static void enter_smm_save_seg_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
{
struct kvm_segment seg;
int offset;
@@ -6194,7 +6195,7 @@ static void process_smi_save_seg_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &seg, n);
offset = 0x7e00 + n * 16;
- flags = process_smi_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8;
+ flags = enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8;
put_smstate(u16, buf, offset, seg.selector);
put_smstate(u16, buf, offset + 2, flags);
put_smstate(u32, buf, offset + 4, seg.limit);
@@ -6202,7 +6203,7 @@ static void process_smi_save_seg_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
}
#endif
-static void process_smi_save_state_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
+static void enter_smm_save_state_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
{
struct desc_ptr dt;
struct kvm_segment seg;
@@ -6226,13 +6227,13 @@ static void process_smi_save_state_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7fc4, seg.selector);
put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f64, seg.base);
put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f60, seg.limit);
- put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f5c, process_smi_get_segment_flags(&seg));
+ put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f5c, enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg));
kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &seg, VCPU_SREG_LDTR);
put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7fc0, seg.selector);
put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f80, seg.base);
put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f7c, seg.limit);
- put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f78, process_smi_get_segment_flags(&seg));
+ put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f78, enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg));
kvm_x86_ops->get_gdt(vcpu, &dt);
put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f74, dt.address);
@@ -6243,7 +6244,7 @@ static void process_smi_save_state_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f54, dt.size);
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
- process_smi_save_seg_32(vcpu, buf, i);
+ enter_smm_save_seg_32(vcpu, buf, i);
put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f14, kvm_read_cr4(vcpu));
@@ -6252,7 +6253,7 @@ static void process_smi_save_state_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7ef8, vcpu->arch.smbase);
}
-static void process_smi_save_state_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
+static void enter_smm_save_state_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
struct desc_ptr dt;
@@ -6284,7 +6285,7 @@ static void process_smi_save_state_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &seg, VCPU_SREG_TR);
put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e90, seg.selector);
- put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e92, process_smi_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8);
+ put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e92, enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8);
put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7e94, seg.limit);
put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7e98, seg.base);
@@ -6294,7 +6295,7 @@ static void process_smi_save_state_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &seg, VCPU_SREG_LDTR);
put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e70, seg.selector);
- put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e72, process_smi_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8);
+ put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e72, enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8);
put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7e74, seg.limit);
put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7e78, seg.base);
@@ -6303,13 +6304,13 @@ static void process_smi_save_state_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7e68, dt.address);
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
- process_smi_save_seg_64(vcpu, buf, i);
+ enter_smm_save_seg_64(vcpu, buf, i);
#else
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
#endif
}
-static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_segment cs, ds;
struct desc_ptr dt;
@@ -6320,9 +6321,9 @@ static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu->arch.hflags |= HF_SMM_MASK;
memset(buf, 0, 512);
if (guest_cpuid_has_longmode(vcpu))
- process_smi_save_state_64(vcpu, buf);
+ enter_smm_save_state_64(vcpu, buf);
else
- process_smi_save_state_32(vcpu, buf);
+ enter_smm_save_state_32(vcpu, buf);
kvm_vcpu_write_guest(vcpu, vcpu->arch.smbase + 0xfe00, buf, sizeof(buf));
@@ -6378,7 +6379,7 @@ static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_mmu_reset_context(vcpu);
}
-static void process_smi_request(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
vcpu->arch.smi_pending = true;
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
@@ -6505,7 +6506,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_STEAL_UPDATE, vcpu))
record_steal_time(vcpu);
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SMI, vcpu))
- process_smi_request(vcpu);
+ process_smi(vcpu);
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_NMI, vcpu))
process_nmi(vcpu);
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_PMU, vcpu))
--
2.5.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread