All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [patch] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code
@ 2017-02-07 13:16 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-02-07 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhenyu Wang, Jike Song
  Cc: intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel, Daniel Vetter,
	intel-gvt-dev, Zhi Wang

If "caps.buf" is already NULL then it doesn't need to be freed or set to
NULL.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 3f656e3a6e5a..de2a55178a37 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -965,11 +965,8 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd,
 			sparse->areas[0].offset  					PAGE_ALIGN(vgpu_aperture_offset(vgpu));
 			sparse->areas[0].size = vgpu_aperture_sz(vgpu);
-			if (!caps.buf) {
-				kfree(caps.buf);
-				caps.buf = NULL;
+			if (!caps.buf)
 				caps.size = 0;
-			}
 			break;
 
 		case VFIO_PCI_BAR3_REGION_INDEX ... VFIO_PCI_BAR5_REGION_INDEX:

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [patch] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code
@ 2017-02-07 13:16 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-02-07 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhenyu Wang, Jike Song
  Cc: intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel, Daniel Vetter,
	intel-gvt-dev, Zhi Wang

If "caps.buf" is already NULL then it doesn't need to be freed or set to
NULL.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 3f656e3a6e5a..de2a55178a37 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -965,11 +965,8 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd,
 			sparse->areas[0].offset =
 					PAGE_ALIGN(vgpu_aperture_offset(vgpu));
 			sparse->areas[0].size = vgpu_aperture_sz(vgpu);
-			if (!caps.buf) {
-				kfree(caps.buf);
-				caps.buf = NULL;
+			if (!caps.buf)
 				caps.size = 0;
-			}
 			break;
 
 		case VFIO_PCI_BAR3_REGION_INDEX ... VFIO_PCI_BAR5_REGION_INDEX:
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code
  2017-02-07 13:16 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2017-02-07 14:34   ` Joonas Lahtinen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-02-07 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter, Zhenyu Wang, Jike Song
  Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel,
	Daniel Vetter, intel-gvt-dev

On ti, 2017-02-07 at 16:16 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> If "caps.buf" is already NULL then it doesn't need to be freed or set to
> NULL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

<SNIP>

> @@ -965,11 +965,8 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd,
>  			sparse->areas[0].offset >  					PAGE_ALIGN(vgpu_aperture_offset(vgpu));
>  			sparse->areas[0].size = vgpu_aperture_sz(vgpu);
> -			if (!caps.buf) {

Looking at the code around, the right thing would be to just remove the
negation? This currently seems like a memory leak.

> -				kfree(caps.buf);
> -				caps.buf = NULL;
> +			if (!caps.buf)
>  				caps.size = 0;
> -			}

And quickly looking, the caps is pre-initialized but unused at this
point, so the whole if could just be removed, right?

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code
@ 2017-02-07 14:34   ` Joonas Lahtinen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-02-07 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter, Zhenyu Wang, Jike Song
  Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel,
	Daniel Vetter, intel-gvt-dev

On ti, 2017-02-07 at 16:16 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> If "caps.buf" is already NULL then it doesn't need to be freed or set to
> NULL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

<SNIP>

> @@ -965,11 +965,8 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd,
>  			sparse->areas[0].offset =
>  					PAGE_ALIGN(vgpu_aperture_offset(vgpu));
>  			sparse->areas[0].size = vgpu_aperture_sz(vgpu);
> -			if (!caps.buf) {

Looking at the code around, the right thing would be to just remove the
negation? This currently seems like a memory leak.

> -				kfree(caps.buf);
> -				caps.buf = NULL;
> +			if (!caps.buf)
>  				caps.size = 0;
> -			}

And quickly looking, the caps is pre-initialized but unused at this
point, so the whole if could just be removed, right?

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code
  2017-02-07 14:34   ` Joonas Lahtinen
@ 2017-02-07 14:44     ` Dan Carpenter
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-02-07 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joonas Lahtinen
  Cc: Zhenyu Wang, Jike Song, David Airlie, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors,
	dri-devel, Daniel Vetter, intel-gvt-dev

On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 04:34:57PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ti, 2017-02-07 at 16:16 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > If "caps.buf" is already NULL then it doesn't need to be freed or set to
> > NULL.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
> > @@ -965,11 +965,8 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd,
> >  			sparse->areas[0].offset > >  					PAGE_ALIGN(vgpu_aperture_offset(vgpu));
> >  			sparse->areas[0].size = vgpu_aperture_sz(vgpu);
> > -			if (!caps.buf) {
> 
> Looking at the code around, the right thing would be to just remove the
> negation? This currently seems like a memory leak.
> 
> > -				kfree(caps.buf);
> > -				caps.buf = NULL;
> > +			if (!caps.buf)
> >  				caps.size = 0;
> > -			}
> 
> And quickly looking, the caps is pre-initialized but unused at this
> point, so the whole if could just be removed, right?

Hm...  Duh.  You're right.  Let me resend.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code
@ 2017-02-07 14:44     ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-02-07 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joonas Lahtinen
  Cc: Zhenyu Wang, Jike Song, David Airlie, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors,
	dri-devel, Daniel Vetter, intel-gvt-dev

On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 04:34:57PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ti, 2017-02-07 at 16:16 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > If "caps.buf" is already NULL then it doesn't need to be freed or set to
> > NULL.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
> > @@ -965,11 +965,8 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd,
> >  			sparse->areas[0].offset =
> >  					PAGE_ALIGN(vgpu_aperture_offset(vgpu));
> >  			sparse->areas[0].size = vgpu_aperture_sz(vgpu);
> > -			if (!caps.buf) {
> 
> Looking at the code around, the right thing would be to just remove the
> negation? This currently seems like a memory leak.
> 
> > -				kfree(caps.buf);
> > -				caps.buf = NULL;
> > +			if (!caps.buf)
> >  				caps.size = 0;
> > -			}
> 
> And quickly looking, the caps is pre-initialized but unused at this
> point, so the whole if could just be removed, right?

Hm...  Duh.  You're right.  Let me resend.

regards,
dan carpenter


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [patch v2] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code
  2017-02-07 14:34   ` Joonas Lahtinen
@ 2017-02-07 14:53     ` Dan Carpenter
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-02-07 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhenyu Wang, Jike Song
  Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel,
	Daniel Vetter, intel-gvt-dev

"caps.buf" is always NULL here and "caps.size" is always zero.  The code
is a no-op and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 3f656e3a6e5a..773a45aa18f8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -965,11 +965,6 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd,
 			sparse->areas[0].offset  					PAGE_ALIGN(vgpu_aperture_offset(vgpu));
 			sparse->areas[0].size = vgpu_aperture_sz(vgpu);
-			if (!caps.buf) {
-				kfree(caps.buf);
-				caps.buf = NULL;
-				caps.size = 0;
-			}
 			break;
 
 		case VFIO_PCI_BAR3_REGION_INDEX ... VFIO_PCI_BAR5_REGION_INDEX:

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [patch v2] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code
@ 2017-02-07 14:53     ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-02-07 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhenyu Wang, Jike Song
  Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel,
	Daniel Vetter, intel-gvt-dev

"caps.buf" is always NULL here and "caps.size" is always zero.  The code
is a no-op and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 3f656e3a6e5a..773a45aa18f8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -965,11 +965,6 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd,
 			sparse->areas[0].offset =
 					PAGE_ALIGN(vgpu_aperture_offset(vgpu));
 			sparse->areas[0].size = vgpu_aperture_sz(vgpu);
-			if (!caps.buf) {
-				kfree(caps.buf);
-				caps.buf = NULL;
-				caps.size = 0;
-			}
 			break;
 
 		case VFIO_PCI_BAR3_REGION_INDEX ... VFIO_PCI_BAR5_REGION_INDEX:
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch v2] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code
  2017-02-07 14:53     ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2017-02-08 12:49       ` Joonas Lahtinen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-02-08 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter, Zhenyu Wang, Jike Song
  Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel,
	Daniel Vetter, intel-gvt-dev

On ti, 2017-02-07 at 17:53 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> "caps.buf" is always NULL here and "caps.size" is always zero.  The code
> is a no-op and can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

I assume Zhenyu will merge this through their tree.

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch v2] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code
@ 2017-02-08 12:49       ` Joonas Lahtinen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-02-08 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter, Zhenyu Wang, Jike Song
  Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel,
	Daniel Vetter, intel-gvt-dev

On ti, 2017-02-07 at 17:53 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> "caps.buf" is always NULL here and "caps.size" is always zero.  The code
> is a no-op and can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

I assume Zhenyu will merge this through their tree.

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch v2] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code
  2017-02-08 12:49       ` Joonas Lahtinen
@ 2017-02-09  1:40         ` Zhenyu Wang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Zhenyu Wang @ 2017-02-09  1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joonas Lahtinen
  Cc: Jike Song, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel, Daniel Vetter,
	intel-gvt-dev, Dan Carpenter

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 572 bytes --]

On 2017.02.08 14:49:22 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ti, 2017-02-07 at 17:53 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > "caps.buf" is always NULL here and "caps.size" is always zero.  The code
> > is a no-op and can be removed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> 
> I assume Zhenyu will merge this through their tree.
> 

yeah, already put in queue. Thanks!

-- 
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 163 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch v2] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code
@ 2017-02-09  1:40         ` Zhenyu Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Zhenyu Wang @ 2017-02-09  1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joonas Lahtinen
  Cc: Jike Song, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel, Daniel Vetter,
	intel-gvt-dev, Dan Carpenter


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 572 bytes --]

On 2017.02.08 14:49:22 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ti, 2017-02-07 at 17:53 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > "caps.buf" is always NULL here and "caps.size" is always zero.  The code
> > is a no-op and can be removed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> 
> I assume Zhenyu will merge this through their tree.
> 

yeah, already put in queue. Thanks!

-- 
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 163 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-09  1:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-07 13:16 [patch] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: remove some dead code Dan Carpenter
2017-02-07 13:16 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-02-07 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2017-02-07 14:34   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-02-07 14:44   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dan Carpenter
2017-02-07 14:44     ` Dan Carpenter
2017-02-07 14:53   ` [patch v2] " Dan Carpenter
2017-02-07 14:53     ` Dan Carpenter
2017-02-08 12:49     ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2017-02-08 12:49       ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-02-09  1:40       ` [Intel-gfx] " Zhenyu Wang
2017-02-09  1:40         ` Zhenyu Wang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.