All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix for 64-bit compilation
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:52:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488966776.2467.13.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a0e362b-8ebf-6254-6387-12967ec8c484@arm.com>

On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 09:26 +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 08/03/17 04:28, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> >> The Allwinner reset controller has 32-bit registers, so translating
> >> the reset cell number into a register and bit offset should not use
> >> any architecture dependent data size. Otherwise this breaks for 64-bit
> >> architectures like arm64.
> >> Fix this by making it clear that it's the hardware register width which
> >> matters here in the calculation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> 
> Thanks a lot!

Applied, thanks.

> > Though I don't expect this driver to be used with arm64 chips.
> 
> Well, weren't we toying with the idea of using this for the A64 PRCM
> support?
> 
> Also the driver is actually pretty generic, and I have (renaming)
> patches lying around to make this obvious.

That is interesting, I have an untested patch that unifies sunxi,
socfpga, and stm32 floating around. I suppose this could be extended to
also cover ath79 and zx2967. I'll dust it off and send it out.

regards
Philipp

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix for 64-bit compilation
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:52:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488966776.2467.13.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a0e362b-8ebf-6254-6387-12967ec8c484@arm.com>

On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 09:26 +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 08/03/17 04:28, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> >> The Allwinner reset controller has 32-bit registers, so translating
> >> the reset cell number into a register and bit offset should not use
> >> any architecture dependent data size. Otherwise this breaks for 64-bit
> >> architectures like arm64.
> >> Fix this by making it clear that it's the hardware register width which
> >> matters here in the calculation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> 
> Thanks a lot!

Applied, thanks.

> > Though I don't expect this driver to be used with arm64 chips.
> 
> Well, weren't we toying with the idea of using this for the A64 PRCM
> support?
> 
> Also the driver is actually pretty generic, and I have (renaming)
> patches lying around to make this obvious.

That is interesting, I have an untested patch that unifies sunxi,
socfpga, and stm32 floating around. I suppose this could be extended to
also cover ath79 and zx2967. I'll dust it off and send it out.

regards
Philipp

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-08 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-06  1:35 [PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix for 64-bit compilation Andre Przywara
2017-03-06  1:35 ` Andre Przywara
2017-03-08  4:28 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-03-08  4:28   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-03-08  9:26   ` Andre Przywara
2017-03-08  9:26     ` Andre Przywara
2017-03-08  9:52     ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2017-03-08  9:52       ` Philipp Zabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1488966776.2467.13.camel@pengutronix.de \
    --to=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.