From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Liang Z Li <liang.z.li@intel.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>, Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:47:08 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1489189628.131264.40.camel@ranerica-desktop> (raw) In-Reply-To: <b35dcbce-8692-df01-840f-935953a2d15d@list.ru> On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 01:01 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote: > 09.03.2017 03:46, Ricardo Neri пишет: > > On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 17:08 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote: > >> 08.03.2017 03:32, Ricardo Neri пишет: > >>> These are the instructions covered by UMIP: > >>> * SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table > >>> * SIDT - Store Interrupt Descriptor Table > >>> * SLDT - Store Local Descriptor Table > >>> * SMSW - Store Machine Status Word > >>> * STR - Store Task Register > >>> > >>> This patchset initially treated tasks running in virtual-8086 mode as a > >>> special case. However, I received clarification that DOSEMU[8] does not > >>> support applications that use these instructions. > >> Yes, this is the case. > >> But at least in the past there was an attempt to > >> support SLDT as it is used by an ancient pharlap > >> DOS extender (currently unsupported by dosemu1/2). > >> So how difficult would it be to add an optional > >> possibility of delivering such SIGSEGV to userspace > >> so that the kernel's dummy emulation can be overridden? > > I suppose a umip=noemulation kernel parameter could be added in this > > case. > Why? > It doesn't need to be global: the app should be > able to change that on its own. Note that no app currently > requires this, so its just for the future, and in the > future the app can start using the new API for this, > if you provide one. Right, I missed this detail. Then, yes the API should allow only one app to relay the SIGSEGV. > > > >> It doesn't need to be a matter of this particular > >> patch set, i.e. this proposal should not trigger a > >> v7 resend of all 21 patches. :) But it would be useful > >> for the future development of dosemu2. > > Would dosemu2 use 32-bit processes in order to keep segmentation? If it > > could use 64-bit processes, emulation is not used in this case and the > > SIGSEGV is delivered to user space. > It does use the mix: 64bit process but some segments > are 32bit for DOS code. Do you mean that dosemu2 will start as a 64-bit process and will jump to 32-bit code segments? My emulation code should work in this case as it will use segmentation in 32-bit code descriptors. Is there anything else needed? Thanks and BR, Ricardo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Liang Z Li <liang.z.li@intel.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>, Alexandre Julliard <> Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:47:08 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1489189628.131264.40.camel@ranerica-desktop> (raw) In-Reply-To: <b35dcbce-8692-df01-840f-935953a2d15d@list.ru> On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 01:01 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote: > 09.03.2017 03:46, Ricardo Neri пишет: > > On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 17:08 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote: > >> 08.03.2017 03:32, Ricardo Neri пишет: > >>> These are the instructions covered by UMIP: > >>> * SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table > >>> * SIDT - Store Interrupt Descriptor Table > >>> * SLDT - Store Local Descriptor Table > >>> * SMSW - Store Machine Status Word > >>> * STR - Store Task Register > >>> > >>> This patchset initially treated tasks running in virtual-8086 mode as a > >>> special case. However, I received clarification that DOSEMU[8] does not > >>> support applications that use these instructions. > >> Yes, this is the case. > >> But at least in the past there was an attempt to > >> support SLDT as it is used by an ancient pharlap > >> DOS extender (currently unsupported by dosemu1/2). > >> So how difficult would it be to add an optional > >> possibility of delivering such SIGSEGV to userspace > >> so that the kernel's dummy emulation can be overridden? > > I suppose a umip=noemulation kernel parameter could be added in this > > case. > Why? > It doesn't need to be global: the app should be > able to change that on its own. Note that no app currently > requires this, so its just for the future, and in the > future the app can start using the new API for this, > if you provide one. Right, I missed this detail. Then, yes the API should allow only one app to relay the SIGSEGV. > > > >> It doesn't need to be a matter of this particular > >> patch set, i.e. this proposal should not trigger a > >> v7 resend of all 21 patches. :) But it would be useful > >> for the future development of dosemu2. > > Would dosemu2 use 32-bit processes in order to keep segmentation? If it > > could use 64-bit processes, emulation is not used in this case and the > > SIGSEGV is delivered to user space. > It does use the mix: 64bit process but some segments > are 32bit for DOS code. Do you mean that dosemu2 will start as a 64-bit process and will jump to 32-bit code segments? My emulation code should work in this case as it will use segmentation in 32-bit code descriptors. Is there anything else needed? Thanks and BR, Ricardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-10 23:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 222+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-03-08 0:32 [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 01/21] x86/mpx: Use signed variables to compute effective addresses Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-11 21:56 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-11 21:56 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-26 1:40 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 1:40 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 02/21] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB index if index points to R/ESP Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-11 11:31 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-11 11:31 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-26 1:39 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 1:39 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 03/21] x86/mpx: Do not use R/EBP as base in the SIB byte with Mod = 0 Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-11 22:08 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-11 22:08 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-26 2:04 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 2:04 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 8:05 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-26 8:05 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-27 22:49 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-27 22:49 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 04/21] x86/mpx, x86/insn: Relocate insn util functions to a new insn-kernel Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-12 10:03 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-12 10:03 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-26 2:05 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 2:05 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 05/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get register offsets Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-12 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-12 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-26 18:13 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 18:13 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-28 10:40 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-28 10:40 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 06/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-18 9:42 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-18 9:42 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-26 20:44 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 20:44 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 20:47 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 20:47 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-30 17:15 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-30 17:15 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-05-05 18:31 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-05-05 18:31 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 07/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-19 10:26 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-19 10:26 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-26 21:51 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 21:51 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-05-04 11:02 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-05-04 11:02 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-05-12 2:13 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-05-12 2:13 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-05-15 17:27 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-05-15 17:27 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 08/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor base address Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-20 8:25 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-20 8:25 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-26 22:37 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 22:37 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-05-05 17:19 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-05-05 17:19 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-05-12 2:09 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-05-12 2:09 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 22:52 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-26 22:52 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-05-05 17:28 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-05-05 17:28 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-05-12 2:06 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-05-12 2:06 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 09/21] x86/insn-eval: Add functions to get default operand and address sizes Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-20 13:06 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-20 13:06 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-27 1:07 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-27 1:07 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 10/21] x86/insn-eval: Do not use R/EBP as base if mod in ModRM is zero Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-21 10:52 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-21 10:52 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-27 1:29 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-27 1:29 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-05-07 17:20 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-05-07 17:20 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-05-12 1:57 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-05-12 1:57 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 11/21] insn/eval: Incorporate segment base in address computation Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-21 14:55 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-21 14:55 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-27 1:31 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-27 1:31 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 12/21] x86/insn: Support both signed 32-bit and 64-bit effective addresses Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-25 13:51 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-25 13:51 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-04-27 3:33 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-27 3:33 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-05-08 11:42 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-05-08 11:42 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-05-12 1:55 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-05-12 1:55 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 13/21] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 16-bit addressing encodings Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 14/21] x86/insn-eval: Add wrapper function for 16-bit and 32-bit address encodings Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 15/21] x86/mm: Relocate page fault error codes to traps.h Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 16:08 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-08 16:08 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 16/21] x86/cpufeature: Add User-Mode Instruction Prevention definitions Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 17/21] x86: Add emulation code for UMIP instructions Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 18/21] x86/umip: Force a page fault when unable to copy emulated result to user Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 19/21] x86/traps: Fixup general protection faults caused by UMIP Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 15:54 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-08 15:54 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 20/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 21/21] selftests/x86: Add tests for " Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 0:32 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 15:56 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-08 15:56 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-10 23:38 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-10 23:38 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 14:08 ` [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable " Stas Sergeev 2017-03-08 14:08 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-08 16:06 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-08 16:06 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-08 16:29 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-08 16:29 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-08 16:46 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-08 16:46 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-08 16:53 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-08 16:53 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-09 1:11 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-09 1:11 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-09 22:05 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-09 22:05 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-10 2:41 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-10 2:41 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-10 10:30 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-10 10:30 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-10 21:04 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-10 21:04 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-10 21:37 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-10 21:37 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-09 1:15 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-09 1:15 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-09 22:10 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-09 22:10 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-10 2:39 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-10 2:39 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-10 11:33 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-10 11:33 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-10 14:17 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-10 14:17 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-11 1:22 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-11 1:22 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-10 23:59 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-10 23:59 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-13 21:25 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-13 21:25 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-27 23:46 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-27 23:46 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-28 9:38 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-28 9:38 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-29 4:38 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-29 4:38 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-29 20:55 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-29 20:55 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-30 5:14 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-30 5:14 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-30 10:10 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-30 10:10 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-31 1:33 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-31 1:33 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-31 14:11 ` Alexandre Julliard 2017-03-31 14:11 ` Alexandre Julliard 2017-03-31 21:26 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-31 21:26 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-04-01 2:18 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-04-01 2:18 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-04-04 2:02 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-04 2:02 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-04 6:08 ` Alexandre Julliard 2017-04-04 6:08 ` Alexandre Julliard 2017-04-01 13:08 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-04-01 13:08 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-04-01 17:49 ` H. Peter Anvin 2017-04-01 17:49 ` H. Peter Anvin 2017-04-02 15:52 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-04-04 9:59 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-04-04 2:05 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-04 2:05 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-04-04 8:03 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-04-04 8:03 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-10 23:58 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-10 23:58 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-09 0:46 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-09 0:46 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-09 22:01 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-09 22:01 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-10 23:47 ` Ricardo Neri [this message] 2017-03-10 23:47 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-10 23:58 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-10 23:58 ` Stas Sergeev 2017-03-11 0:13 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-11 0:13 ` Ricardo Neri 2017-03-08 16:07 ` Andy Lutomirski 2017-03-08 16:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1489189628.131264.40.camel@ranerica-desktop \ --to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=bp@suse.de \ --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \ --cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \ --cc=corbet@lwn.net \ --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \ --cc=julliard@winehq.org \ --cc=liang.z.li@intel.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=luto@kernel.org \ --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \ --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \ --cc=shuah@kernel.org \ --cc=slaoub@gmail.com \ --cc=stsp@list.ru \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \ --cc=wine-devel@winehq.org \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.