All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Zakharov <Vladislav.Zakharov@synopsys.com>
To: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"eladkan@mellanox.com" <eladkan@mellanox.com>,
	"noamca@mellanox.com" <noamca@mellanox.com>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ezchip: nps_enet: check if napi has been completed
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:56:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493211381.20370.23.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170329.143014.2001816338079751776.davem@davemloft.net>

Hi David, all,

On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 14:30 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vlad Zakharov <Vladislav.Zakharov@synopsys.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:41:46 +0300
> 
> > 
> > After a new NAPI_STATE_MISSED state was added to NAPI we can get into
> > this state and in such case we have to reschedule NAPI as some work is
> > still pending and we have to process it. napi_complete_done() function
> > returns false if we have to reschedule something (e.g. in case we were
> > in MISSED state) as current polling have not been completed yet.
> > 
> > nps_enet driver hasn't been verifying the return value of
> > napi_complete_done() and has been forcibly enabling interrupts. That is
> > not correct as we should not enable interrupts before we have processed
> > all scheduled work. As a result we were getting trapped in interrupt
> > hanlder chain as we had never been able to disabale ethernet
> > interrupts again.
> > 
> > So this patch makes nps_enet_poll() func verify return value of
> > napi_complete_done() and enable interrupts only in case all scheduled
> > work has been completed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vlad Zakharov <vzakhar@synopsys.com>
> 
> Applied.
> 
> Eric, if this is really required now, we have 148 broken drivers still.

Could you please backport this patch to stable tree (starting from 4.10) as it is pretty important and fixes nps_enet
driver?

It became actual after Eric's commit 39e6c8208d7b (net: solve a NAPI race) which has already been backported to 4.10.

Thanks.

-- 
Best regards,
Vlad Zakharov <vzakhar@synopsys.com>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladislav.Zakharov@synopsys.com (Vlad Zakharov)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ezchip: nps_enet: check if napi has been completed
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:56:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493211381.20370.23.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170329.143014.2001816338079751776.davem@davemloft.net>

Hi David, all,

On Wed, 2017-03-29@14:30 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vlad Zakharov <Vladislav.Zakharov at synopsys.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:41:46 +0300
> 
> > 
> > After a new NAPI_STATE_MISSED state was added to NAPI we can get into
> > this state and in such case we have to reschedule NAPI as some work is
> > still pending and we have to process it. napi_complete_done() function
> > returns false if we have to reschedule something (e.g. in case we were
> > in MISSED state) as current polling have not been completed yet.
> > 
> > nps_enet driver hasn't been verifying the return value of
> > napi_complete_done() and has been forcibly enabling interrupts. That is
> > not correct as we should not enable interrupts before we have processed
> > all scheduled work. As a result we were getting trapped in interrupt
> > hanlder chain as we had never been able to disabale ethernet
> > interrupts again.
> > 
> > So this patch makes nps_enet_poll() func verify return value of
> > napi_complete_done() and enable interrupts only in case all scheduled
> > work has been completed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vlad Zakharov <vzakhar at synopsys.com>
> 
> Applied.
> 
> Eric, if this is really required now, we have 148 broken drivers still.

Could you please backport this patch to stable tree (starting from 4.10) as it is pretty important and fixes nps_enet
driver?

It became actual after Eric's commit?39e6c8208d7b (net: solve a NAPI race) which has already been backported to 4.10.

Thanks.

-- 
Best regards,
Vlad Zakharov <vzakhar at synopsys.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-26 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-29 10:41 [PATCH] ezchip: nps_enet: check if napi has been completed Vlad Zakharov
2017-03-29 10:41 ` Vlad Zakharov
2017-03-29 10:41 ` Vlad Zakharov
2017-03-29 14:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-29 14:52   ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-29 21:30 ` David Miller
2017-03-29 21:30   ` David Miller
2017-03-29 21:30   ` David Miller
2017-03-29 21:41   ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-29 21:41     ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-29 21:41     ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-30  9:16     ` Vlad Zakharov
2017-03-30  9:16       ` Vlad Zakharov
2017-03-30  9:16       ` Vlad Zakharov
2017-03-30 13:25       ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-30 13:25         ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-30 13:25         ` Eric Dumazet
2017-04-26 12:56   ` Vlad Zakharov [this message]
2017-04-26 12:56     ` Vlad Zakharov
2017-04-26 12:56     ` Vlad Zakharov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1493211381.20370.23.camel@synopsys.com \
    --to=vladislav.zakharov@synopsys.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eladkan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noamca@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.