Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Allow ib_clients to nullify .add but still get .remove events reliably

[Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On Sun, 2017-07-02 at 12:14 +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> On 7/2/2017 11:20 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > Some ULPs are just interested in device removal notification with
> > no specific
> > association because they work over RDMA_CM so no need for detecting
> > appearance
> > of the devices. That wasn't the because the corresponding
> > ib_client_data
> > was never added to the device clients list when the ib_client
> > registers,
> > Patch 1 fixes it. Patches 2-3 just removes the empty .add callout
> > nvme(t)-rdma set.
> > 
> > Changes from v1:
> > - reword patch 1 change log title
> > - collected review tags
> > 
> > Note that this will create a conflict with jens's for-4.13 which we
> > added
> > ib_client registration to nvmet-rdma.
> > 
> > Sagi Grimberg (3):
> >   RDMA/core: make ib_device.add method optional
> >   nvme-rdma: remove redundant empty device add callout
> >   nvmet-rdma: remove redundant empty device add callout
> 
> All these patches looks fine to me,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

Thanks, series applied.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
    GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
    Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html