All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
To: christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: jintack@cs.columbia.edu, pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 06/31] KVM: arm64: Invalidate virtual EL2 TLB entries when needed
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2017 22:10:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507000273-3735-4-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507000273-3735-1-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org>

From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Sometimes when we are invalidating the TLB for a certain S2 MMU
context, this context can also have EL2 context associated with it and
we have to invalidate this too.

Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c |  5 +++++
 virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index 41e0654..63dd897 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -362,6 +362,11 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
 		u64 vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->vmid, mmu);
 
 		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid, vttbr);
+
+		if (mmu->el2_vmid.vmid) {
+			vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->el2_vmid, mmu);
+			kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid, vttbr);
+		}
 		*last_ran = vcpu->vcpu_id;
 	}
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
index 0edcf23..184cdc9 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
@@ -64,7 +64,21 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
 	struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.mmu;
 	u64 vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->vmid, mmu);
 
-	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, vttbr);
+	if (!mmu->el2_vmid.vmid) {
+		/*
+		 * For a normal (i.e. non-nested) guest, flush entries for the
+		 * given VMID *
+		 */
+		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, vttbr);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * When supporting nested virtualization, we can have multiple
+		 * VMIDs in play for each VCPU in the VM, so it's really not
+		 * worth it to try to quiesce the system and flush all the
+		 * VMIDs that may be in use, instead just nuke the whole thing.
+		 */
+		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_flush_vm_context);
+	}
 }
 
 static void kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t ipa)
@@ -72,6 +86,13 @@ static void kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t ipa)
 	u64 vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->vmid, mmu);
 
 	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, vttbr, ipa);
+
+	if (!mmu->el2_vmid.vmid) {
+		/* Nothing to do more for a non-nested guest */
+		return;
+	}
+	vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->el2_vmid, mmu);
+	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, vttbr, ipa);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
To: christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 06/31] KVM: arm64: Invalidate virtual EL2 TLB entries when needed
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2017 22:10:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507000273-3735-4-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507000273-3735-1-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org>

From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Sometimes when we are invalidating the TLB for a certain S2 MMU
context, this context can also have EL2 context associated with it and
we have to invalidate this too.

Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c |  5 +++++
 virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index 41e0654..63dd897 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -362,6 +362,11 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
 		u64 vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->vmid, mmu);
 
 		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid, vttbr);
+
+		if (mmu->el2_vmid.vmid) {
+			vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->el2_vmid, mmu);
+			kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid, vttbr);
+		}
 		*last_ran = vcpu->vcpu_id;
 	}
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
index 0edcf23..184cdc9 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
@@ -64,7 +64,21 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
 	struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.mmu;
 	u64 vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->vmid, mmu);
 
-	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, vttbr);
+	if (!mmu->el2_vmid.vmid) {
+		/*
+		 * For a normal (i.e. non-nested) guest, flush entries for the
+		 * given VMID *
+		 */
+		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, vttbr);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * When supporting nested virtualization, we can have multiple
+		 * VMIDs in play for each VCPU in the VM, so it's really not
+		 * worth it to try to quiesce the system and flush all the
+		 * VMIDs that may be in use, instead just nuke the whole thing.
+		 */
+		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_flush_vm_context);
+	}
 }
 
 static void kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t ipa)
@@ -72,6 +86,13 @@ static void kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t ipa)
 	u64 vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->vmid, mmu);
 
 	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, vttbr, ipa);
+
+	if (!mmu->el2_vmid.vmid) {
+		/* Nothing to do more for a non-nested guest */
+		return;
+	}
+	vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->el2_vmid, mmu);
+	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, vttbr, ipa);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jintack.lim@linaro.org (Jintack Lim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 06/31] KVM: arm64: Invalidate virtual EL2 TLB entries when needed
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2017 22:10:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507000273-3735-4-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507000273-3735-1-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org>

From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Sometimes when we are invalidating the TLB for a certain S2 MMU
context, this context can also have EL2 context associated with it and
we have to invalidate this too.

Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c |  5 +++++
 virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index 41e0654..63dd897 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -362,6 +362,11 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
 		u64 vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->vmid, mmu);
 
 		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid, vttbr);
+
+		if (mmu->el2_vmid.vmid) {
+			vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->el2_vmid, mmu);
+			kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid, vttbr);
+		}
 		*last_ran = vcpu->vcpu_id;
 	}
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
index 0edcf23..184cdc9 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
@@ -64,7 +64,21 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
 	struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.mmu;
 	u64 vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->vmid, mmu);
 
-	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, vttbr);
+	if (!mmu->el2_vmid.vmid) {
+		/*
+		 * For a normal (i.e. non-nested) guest, flush entries for the
+		 * given VMID *
+		 */
+		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, vttbr);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * When supporting nested virtualization, we can have multiple
+		 * VMIDs in play for each VCPU in the VM, so it's really not
+		 * worth it to try to quiesce the system and flush all the
+		 * VMIDs that may be in use, instead just nuke the whole thing.
+		 */
+		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_flush_vm_context);
+	}
 }
 
 static void kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t ipa)
@@ -72,6 +86,13 @@ static void kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t ipa)
 	u64 vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->vmid, mmu);
 
 	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, vttbr, ipa);
+
+	if (!mmu->el2_vmid.vmid) {
+		/* Nothing to do more for a non-nested guest */
+		return;
+	}
+	vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->el2_vmid, mmu);
+	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, vttbr, ipa);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-03  3:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-03  3:10 [RFC PATCH v2 03/31] KVM: arm/arm64: Remove unused params in mmu functions Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/31] KVM: arm/arm64: Abstract stage-2 MMU state into a separate structure Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/31] KVM: arm/arm64: Support mmu for the virtual EL2 execution Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` Jintack Lim [this message]
2017-10-03  3:10   ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/31] KVM: arm64: Invalidate virtual EL2 TLB entries when needed Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/31] KVM: arm64: Setup vttbr_el2 on each VM entry Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/31] KVM: arm/arm64: Make mmu functions non-static Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/31] KVM: arm/arm64: Manage mmus for nested VMs Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/31] KVM: arm/arm64: Unmap/flush shadow stage 2 page tables Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/31] KVM: arm64: Implement nested Stage-2 page table walk logic Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/31] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle shadow stage 2 page faults Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/31] KVM: arm/arm64: Move kvm_is_write_fault to header file Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/31] KVM: arm/arm64: Forward the guest hypervisor's stage 2 permission faults Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/31] KVM: arm64: Move system register helper functions around Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/31] KVM: arm64: Introduce sys_reg_desc.forward_trap Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/31] KVM: arm64: Rework the system instruction emulation framework Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:10   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/31] KVM: arm64: Enumerate AT and TLBI instructions to emulate Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/31] KVM: arm64: Describe AT instruction emulation design Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03 17:37   ` James Morse
2017-10-03 17:37     ` James Morse
2017-10-03 21:11     ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03 21:11       ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03 21:11       ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-04  9:13       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-04  9:13         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/31] KVM: arm64: Implement AT instruction handling Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/31] KVM: arm64: Emulate AT S1E[01] instructions Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/31] KVM: arm64: Emulate AT S1E2 instructions Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/31] KVM: arm64: Emulate AT S12E[01] instructions Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/31] KVM: arm64: Emulate TLBI ALLE2(IS) instruction Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/31] KVM: arm64: Emulate TLBI VAE2* instrutions Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/31] KVM: arm64: Emulate TLBI ALLE1(IS) Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/31] KVM: arm64: Emulate TLBI VMALLS12E1(IS) instruction Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/31] KVM: arm64: Emulate TLBI IPAS2E1* instructions Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/31] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.AT and NV setting Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/31] KVM: arm64: Emulate TLBI instructions accesible from EL1 Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/31] KVM: arm64: Fixes to toggle_cache for nesting Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim
2017-10-03  3:11   ` Jintack Lim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1507000273-3735-4-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org \
    --to=jintack.lim@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=jintack@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.