From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/pci-host: Fix x86 Host Bridges 64bit PCI hole
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 08:55:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508482525.18146.6.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d231ac0a-bb7d-78aa-ddb4-8048cc7bdfd8@redhat.com>
Hi,
> > commit message says:
> >
> > <quote>
> > It turns out that some 32 bit windows guests crash
> > if 64 bit PCI hole size is >2G.
> > </quote>
> >
> > Why this suddenly isn't a problem any more?
> >
>
> I suppose it is, so we need a way to turn it "off".
Or have machine types behave differently, i.e. give q35 a large 64bit
hole and leave pc as-is.
Devices with that large bars are most likely pci express anyway ...
> This is how I started, however Eduardo and (and maybe Michael ?)
> where against letting the upper management software to deal with
> such a low low level detail. They simply can't take such a decision.
> This is why the property you mentioned is not ever linked
> in code anywhere! It is simply not implemented and not used.
Makes sense.
BTW: Is it safe to just assume 40 bits physical is going to work? My
workstation:
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700K CPU @ 4.20GHz
address sizes : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
Does this imply ept is limited 39 bits physical too?
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-20 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-18 9:58 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/pci-host: Fix x86 Host Bridges 64bit PCI hole Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-10-18 10:45 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-10-18 10:57 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-10-18 11:40 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-19 9:30 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-10-19 10:41 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-19 11:29 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-10-19 11:52 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-19 13:03 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-10-19 13:34 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-10-20 6:55 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2017-10-20 9:32 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-20 10:59 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-10-20 14:06 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-10-20 13:47 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-10-23 5:45 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-10-23 8:46 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-10-23 9:16 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-10-23 9:35 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1508482525.18146.6.camel@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.