All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, sulrich@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/17] ixgbe: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:42:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521513753-7325-3-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1521513753-7325-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>

Code includes wmb() followed by writel() in multiple places. writel()
already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64.

This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.

Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
index 0da5aa2..58ed70f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -1692,7 +1692,7 @@ void ixgbe_alloc_rx_buffers(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring, u16 cleaned_count)
 		 * such as IA-64).
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, rx_ring->tail);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -2453,7 +2453,7 @@ static int ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
 		 * know there are new descriptors to fetch.
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		writel(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
 
 		xdp_do_flush_map();
 	}
@@ -8078,7 +8078,7 @@ static int ixgbe_tx_map(struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring,
 	ixgbe_maybe_stop_tx(tx_ring, DESC_NEEDED);
 
 	if (netif_xmit_stopped(txring_txq(tx_ring)) || !skb->xmit_more) {
-		writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
 
 		/* we need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
 		 * at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
@@ -10014,7 +10014,7 @@ static void ixgbe_xdp_flush(struct net_device *dev)
 	 * are new descriptors to fetch.
 	 */
 	wmb();
-	writel(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
+	writel_relaxed(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
 
 	return;
 }
-- 
2.7.4

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/17] ixgbe: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:42:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521513753-7325-3-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1521513753-7325-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>

Code includes wmb() followed by writel() in multiple places. writel()
already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64.

This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.

Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
index 0da5aa2..58ed70f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -1692,7 +1692,7 @@ void ixgbe_alloc_rx_buffers(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring, u16 cleaned_count)
 		 * such as IA-64).
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, rx_ring->tail);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -2453,7 +2453,7 @@ static int ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
 		 * know there are new descriptors to fetch.
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		writel(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
 
 		xdp_do_flush_map();
 	}
@@ -8078,7 +8078,7 @@ static int ixgbe_tx_map(struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring,
 	ixgbe_maybe_stop_tx(tx_ring, DESC_NEEDED);
 
 	if (netif_xmit_stopped(txring_txq(tx_ring)) || !skb->xmit_more) {
-		writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
 
 		/* we need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
 		 * at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
@@ -10014,7 +10014,7 @@ static void ixgbe_xdp_flush(struct net_device *dev)
 	 * are new descriptors to fetch.
 	 */
 	wmb();
-	writel(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
+	writel_relaxed(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
 
 	return;
 }
-- 
2.7.4

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 02/17] ixgbe: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:42:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521513753-7325-3-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1521513753-7325-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>

Code includes wmb() followed by writel() in multiple places. writel()
already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64.

This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.

Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
index 0da5aa2..58ed70f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -1692,7 +1692,7 @@ void ixgbe_alloc_rx_buffers(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring, u16 cleaned_count)
 		 * such as IA-64).
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, rx_ring->tail);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -2453,7 +2453,7 @@ static int ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
 		 * know there are new descriptors to fetch.
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		writel(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
 
 		xdp_do_flush_map();
 	}
@@ -8078,7 +8078,7 @@ static int ixgbe_tx_map(struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring,
 	ixgbe_maybe_stop_tx(tx_ring, DESC_NEEDED);
 
 	if (netif_xmit_stopped(txring_txq(tx_ring)) || !skb->xmit_more) {
-		writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
 
 		/* we need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
 		 * at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
@@ -10014,7 +10014,7 @@ static void ixgbe_xdp_flush(struct net_device *dev)
 	 * are new descriptors to fetch.
 	 */
 	wmb();
-	writel(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
+	writel_relaxed(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
 
 	return;
 }
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-20  2:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-20  2:42 [PATCH v4 00/17] netdev: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] i40e/i40evf: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2018-03-20  2:42   ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 02/17] ixgbe: eliminate " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] igbvf: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] igb: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb() Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] fm10k: Eliminate " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] drivers: net: cxgb: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] net: qla3xxx: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] qlcnic: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] bnx2x: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-22 10:10   ` Kalluru, Sudarsana
2018-03-22 10:10     ` Kalluru, Sudarsana
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] net: cxgb4/cxgb4vf: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 23:03   ` Casey Leedom
2018-03-21 23:03     ` Casey Leedom
2018-03-22  0:00     ` okaya
2018-03-22  0:00       ` okaya at codeaurora.org
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] net: cxgb3: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] net: qlge: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] bnxt_en: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] qed/qede: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] net: ena: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-20  2:42   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-25 12:06   ` Belgazal, Netanel
2018-03-25 12:06     ` Belgazal, Netanel
2018-03-25 13:33     ` okaya
2018-03-25 13:33       ` okaya at codeaurora.org
2018-03-21 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 00/17] netdev: " David Miller
2018-03-21 15:56   ` David Miller
2018-03-21 19:06   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 19:06     ` Sinan Kaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1521513753-7325-3-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sulrich@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.