* [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-23 8:56 Julia Lawall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-23 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, linux-arm-kernel Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. --- drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-23 8:56 ` Julia Lawall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-23 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: kernel-janitors, dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, Dan Williams, linux-scsi, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-rdma, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel, linux-wireless Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. --- drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-23 8:56 ` Julia Lawall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-23 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, linux-arm-kernel Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. --- drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-23 8:56 ` Julia Lawall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-23 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, linux-arm-kernel Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. --- drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-23 8:56 ` Julia Lawall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-23 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, linux-arm-kernel Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. --- drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-23 8:56 ` Julia Lawall ` (2 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2018-12-23 12:13 ` SF Markus Elfring -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2018-12-23 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall, kernel-janitors Cc: linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, linux-arm-kernel, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-btrfs > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. Do you know any more places where calls of other macros can be deleted? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-23 8:56 ` Julia Lawall ` (3 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2018-12-23 21:49 ` Tom Psyborg -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Tom Psyborg @ 2018-12-23 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel Why do you CC this to so many lists? On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. > > --- > > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-23 8:56 ` Julia Lawall (?) @ 2018-12-23 21:49 ` Tom Psyborg -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Tom Psyborg @ 2018-12-23 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall Cc: Andy Shevchenko, kernel-janitors, dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, Dan Williams, linux-scsi, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-rdma, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel, linux-wireless Why do you CC this to so many lists? On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. > > --- > > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-23 21:49 ` Tom Psyborg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Tom Psyborg @ 2018-12-23 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel Why do you CC this to so many lists? On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. > > --- > > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-23 21:49 ` Tom Psyborg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Tom Psyborg @ 2018-12-23 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel Why do you CC this to so many lists? On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. > > --- > > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-23 21:49 ` Tom Psyborg (?) (?) @ 2018-12-23 22:06 ` Julia Lawall -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-23 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Psyborg Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Tom Psyborg wrote: > Why do you CC this to so many lists? Because the different files are in different subsystems. The cover letter goes to a list for each file, or to a person if there is no list. The patches go to the people and lists associated with the affected files. julia > > On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: > > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. > > > > --- > > > > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- > > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - > > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - > > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- > > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- > > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - > > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - > > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - > > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- > > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - > > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - > > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - > > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - > > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - > > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-23 21:49 ` Tom Psyborg (?) @ 2018-12-23 22:06 ` Julia Lawall -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-23 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Psyborg Cc: Julia Lawall, Andy Shevchenko, kernel-janitors, dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, Dan Williams, linux-scsi, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-rdma, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel, linux-wireless On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Tom Psyborg wrote: > Why do you CC this to so many lists? Because the different files are in different subsystems. The cover letter goes to a list for each file, or to a person if there is no list. The patches go to the people and lists associated with the affected files. julia > > On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: > > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. > > > > --- > > > > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- > > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - > > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - > > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- > > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- > > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - > > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - > > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - > > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- > > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - > > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - > > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - > > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - > > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - > > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-23 22:06 ` Julia Lawall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-23 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Psyborg Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Tom Psyborg wrote: > Why do you CC this to so many lists? Because the different files are in different subsystems. The cover letter goes to a list for each file, or to a person if there is no list. The patches go to the people and lists associated with the affected files. julia > > On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: > > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. > > > > --- > > > > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- > > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - > > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - > > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- > > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- > > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - > > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - > > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - > > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- > > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - > > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - > > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - > > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - > > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - > > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) > > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-23 22:06 ` Julia Lawall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-23 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Psyborg Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Tom Psyborg wrote: > Why do you CC this to so many lists? Because the different files are in different subsystems. The cover letter goes to a list for each file, or to a person if there is no list. The patches go to the people and lists associated with the affected files. julia > > On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: > > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. > > > > --- > > > > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- > > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - > > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - > > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- > > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- > > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - > > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - > > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - > > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- > > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - > > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - > > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - > > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - > > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - > > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-23 22:06 ` Julia Lawall (?) (?) @ 2018-12-25 22:12 ` Tom Psyborg -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Tom Psyborg @ 2018-12-25 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is more than enough On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Tom Psyborg wrote: > >> Why do you CC this to so many lists? > > Because the different files are in different subsystems. The cover letter > goes to a list for each file, or to a person if there is no list. The > patches go to the people and lists associated with the affected files. > > julia > >> >> On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: >> > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. >> > >> > --- >> > >> > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- >> > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - >> > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - >> > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- >> > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - >> > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - >> > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - >> > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- >> > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - >> > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - >> > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - >> > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - >> > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - >> > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) >> > >> > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-23 22:06 ` Julia Lawall (?) (?) @ 2018-12-25 22:12 ` Tom Psyborg -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Tom Psyborg @ 2018-12-25 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall Cc: Andy Shevchenko, kernel-janitors, dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, Dan Williams, linux-scsi, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-rdma, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel, linux-wireless there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is more than enough On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Tom Psyborg wrote: > >> Why do you CC this to so many lists? > > Because the different files are in different subsystems. The cover letter > goes to a list for each file, or to a person if there is no list. The > patches go to the people and lists associated with the affected files. > > julia > >> >> On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: >> > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. >> > >> > --- >> > >> > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- >> > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - >> > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - >> > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- >> > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - >> > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - >> > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - >> > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- >> > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - >> > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - >> > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - >> > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - >> > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - >> > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) >> > >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-25 22:12 ` Tom Psyborg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Tom Psyborg @ 2018-12-25 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is more than enough On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Tom Psyborg wrote: > >> Why do you CC this to so many lists? > > Because the different files are in different subsystems. The cover letter > goes to a list for each file, or to a person if there is no list. The > patches go to the people and lists associated with the affected files. > > julia > >> >> On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: >> > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. >> > >> > --- >> > >> > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- >> > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - >> > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - >> > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- >> > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - >> > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - >> > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - >> > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- >> > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - >> > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - >> > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - >> > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - >> > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - >> > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) >> > >> > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-25 22:12 ` Tom Psyborg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Tom Psyborg @ 2018-12-25 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is more than enough On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Tom Psyborg wrote: > >> Why do you CC this to so many lists? > > Because the different files are in different subsystems. The cover letter > goes to a list for each file, or to a person if there is no list. The > patches go to the people and lists associated with the affected files. > > julia > >> >> On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote: >> > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. >> > >> > --- >> > >> > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- >> > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - >> > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - >> > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- >> > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - >> > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - >> > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - >> > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- >> > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - >> > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - >> > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - >> > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - >> > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - >> > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) >> > >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-25 22:12 ` Tom Psyborg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Tom Psyborg @ 2018-12-25 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall Cc: Andy Shevchenko, kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Dan Williams, linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-xfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-btrfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel-GuqFBffKawtpuQazS67q72D2FQJk+8+b, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is more than enough On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Tom Psyborg wrote: > >> Why do you CC this to so many lists? > > Because the different files are in different subsystems. The cover letter > goes to a list for each file, or to a person if there is no list. The > patches go to the people and lists associated with the affected files. > > julia > >> >> On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used. >> > >> > --- >> > >> > drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 5 ----- >> > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 1 - >> > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 - >> > drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 3 --- >> > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 1 - >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 5 ----- >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 --- >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 1 - >> > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 1 - >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 - >> > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 1 - >> > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 2 -- >> > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 - >> > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 1 - >> > fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 1 - >> > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 - >> > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 1 - >> > 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-) >> > >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-25 22:12 ` Tom Psyborg (?) (?) @ 2018-12-27 13:40 ` Dan Carpenter -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Dan Carpenter @ 2018-12-27 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Psyborg Cc: Julia Lawall, Andy Shevchenko, kernel-janitors, dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, Dan Williams, linux-scsi, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-rdma, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel, linux-wireless On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > more than enough > I don't know who you were discussing this with... You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a clear rule. For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. regards, dan carpenter PS: Please, no more top posting. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-27 13:40 ` Dan Carpenter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Dan Carpenter @ 2018-12-27 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Psyborg Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > more than enough > I don't know who you were discussing this with... You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a clear rule. For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. regards, dan carpenter PS: Please, no more top posting. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-27 13:40 ` Dan Carpenter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Dan Carpenter @ 2018-12-27 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Psyborg Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > more than enough > I don't know who you were discussing this with... You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a clear rule. For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. regards, dan carpenter PS: Please, no more top posting. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-27 13:40 ` Dan Carpenter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Dan Carpenter @ 2018-12-27 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Psyborg Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > more than enough > I don't know who you were discussing this with... You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a clear rule. For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. regards, dan carpenter PS: Please, no more top posting. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-27 13:40 ` Dan Carpenter (?) (?) @ 2018-12-29 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2018-12-29 5:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Tom Psyborg, Julia Lawall, Andy Shevchenko, kernel-janitors, dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, Dan Williams, linux-scsi, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-rdma, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel, linux-wireless On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > > more than enough > > > > I don't know who you were discussing this with... > > You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a > clear rule. > > For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in > a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the > patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are > dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. Agreed. Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches" (as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :) For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to go wanting for more context. --D > If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into > get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. > > My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always > remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. > > regards, > dan carpenter > > PS: Please, no more top posting. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-29 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2018-12-29 5:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Carpenter Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, Tom Psyborg, linux-arm-kernel On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > > more than enough > > > > I don't know who you were discussing this with... > > You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a > clear rule. > > For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in > a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the > patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are > dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. Agreed. Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches" (as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :) For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to go wanting for more context. --D > If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into > get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. > > My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always > remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. > > regards, > dan carpenter > > PS: Please, no more top posting. > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-29 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2018-12-29 5:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Carpenter Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, Tom Psyborg, linux-arm-kernel On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > > more than enough > > > > I don't know who you were discussing this with... > > You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a > clear rule. > > For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in > a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the > patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are > dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. Agreed. Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches" (as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :) For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to go wanting for more context. --D > If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into > get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. > > My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always > remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. > > regards, > dan carpenter > > PS: Please, no more top posting. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-29 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2018-12-29 5:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Carpenter Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, Tom Psyborg, linux-arm-kernel On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > > more than enough > > > > I don't know who you were discussing this with... > > You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a > clear rule. > > For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in > a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the > patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are > dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. Agreed. Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches" (as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :) For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to go wanting for more context. --D > If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into > get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. > > My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always > remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. > > regards, > dan carpenter > > PS: Please, no more top posting. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-29 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong ` (2 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2018-12-29 6:19 ` Julia Lawall -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-29 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Darrick J. Wong Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, linux-arm-kernel, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, Tom Psyborg, Dan Carpenter On Fri, 28 Dec 2018, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > > > more than enough > > > > > > > I don't know who you were discussing this with... > > > > You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a > > clear rule. > > > > For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in > > a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the > > patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are > > dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. > > Agreed. Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches" > (as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :) > > For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches > than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to > go wanting for more context. Thanks for the confirmation. I was planning to ignore the 4-5 advice, because there is no way in this case to make a meaningful 4-5 list suggestion - it's either all or nothing. But 20 patches at once is perhaps a lot as well. In this case, I just wanted to get rid of the whole issue at once. julia _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-29 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong (?) @ 2018-12-29 6:19 ` Julia Lawall -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-29 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Darrick J. Wong Cc: Dan Carpenter, Tom Psyborg, Julia Lawall, Andy Shevchenko, kernel-janitors, dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, Dan Williams, linux-scsi, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-rdma, linux-xfs, linux-btrfs, Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel, linux-wireless On Fri, 28 Dec 2018, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > > > more than enough > > > > > > > I don't know who you were discussing this with... > > > > You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a > > clear rule. > > > > For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in > > a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the > > patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are > > dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. > > Agreed. Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches" > (as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :) > > For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches > than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to > go wanting for more context. Thanks for the confirmation. I was planning to ignore the 4-5 advice, because there is no way in this case to make a meaningful 4-5 list suggestion - it's either all or nothing. But 20 patches at once is perhaps a lot as well. In this case, I just wanted to get rid of the whole issue at once. julia ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-29 6:19 ` Julia Lawall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-29 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Darrick J. Wong Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, linux-arm-kernel, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, Tom Psyborg, Dan Carpenter On Fri, 28 Dec 2018, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > > > more than enough > > > > > > > I don't know who you were discussing this with... > > > > You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a > > clear rule. > > > > For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in > > a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the > > patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are > > dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. > > Agreed. Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches" > (as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :) > > For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches > than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to > go wanting for more context. Thanks for the confirmation. I was planning to ignore the 4-5 advice, because there is no way in this case to make a meaningful 4-5 list suggestion - it's either all or nothing. But 20 patches at once is perhaps a lot as well. In this case, I just wanted to get rid of the whole issue at once. julia _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD @ 2018-12-29 6:19 ` Julia Lawall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2018-12-29 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Darrick J. Wong Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, linux-arm-kernel, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, Tom Psyborg, Dan Carpenter On Fri, 28 Dec 2018, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > > > more than enough > > > > > > > I don't know who you were discussing this with... > > > > You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a > > clear rule. > > > > For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in > > a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the > > patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are > > dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. > > Agreed. Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches" > (as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :) > > For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches > than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to > go wanting for more context. Thanks for the confirmation. I was planning to ignore the 4-5 advice, because there is no way in this case to make a meaningful 4-5 list suggestion - it's either all or nothing. But 20 patches at once is perhaps a lot as well. In this case, I just wanted to get rid of the whole issue at once. julia ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-27 13:40 ` Dan Carpenter ` (3 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2018-12-29 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2018-12-29 5:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Carpenter Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, Tom Psyborg, linux-arm-kernel On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > > more than enough > > > > I don't know who you were discussing this with... > > You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a > clear rule. > > For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in > a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the > patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are > dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. Agreed. Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches" (as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :) For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to go wanting for more context. --D > If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into > get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. > > My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always > remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. > > regards, > dan carpenter > > PS: Please, no more top posting. > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD 2018-12-25 22:12 ` Tom Psyborg ` (3 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2018-12-27 13:40 ` Dan Carpenter -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread From: Dan Carpenter @ 2018-12-27 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Psyborg Cc: linux-wireless, linux-nfs, Stefano Stabellini, linux-scsi, linux-rdma, netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, linux-xfs, Julia Lawall, linux-btrfs, dmaengine, xen-devel, Dan Williams, Andy Shevchenko, linux-arm-kernel On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > more than enough > I don't know who you were discussing this with... You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a clear rule. For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. regards, dan carpenter PS: Please, no more top posting. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-29 6:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 33+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-12-23 8:56 [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD Julia Lawall 2018-12-23 8:56 Julia Lawall 2018-12-23 8:56 ` Julia Lawall 2018-12-23 8:56 ` Julia Lawall 2018-12-23 8:56 ` Julia Lawall 2018-12-23 12:13 ` SF Markus Elfring 2018-12-23 21:49 ` Tom Psyborg 2018-12-23 21:49 ` Tom Psyborg 2018-12-23 21:49 ` Tom Psyborg 2018-12-23 21:49 ` Tom Psyborg 2018-12-23 22:06 ` Julia Lawall 2018-12-23 22:06 ` Julia Lawall 2018-12-23 22:06 ` Julia Lawall 2018-12-23 22:06 ` Julia Lawall 2018-12-25 22:12 ` Tom Psyborg 2018-12-25 22:12 ` Tom Psyborg 2018-12-25 22:12 ` Tom Psyborg 2018-12-25 22:12 ` Tom Psyborg 2018-12-25 22:12 ` Tom Psyborg 2018-12-27 13:40 ` Dan Carpenter 2018-12-27 13:40 ` Dan Carpenter 2018-12-27 13:40 ` Dan Carpenter 2018-12-27 13:40 ` Dan Carpenter 2018-12-29 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong 2018-12-29 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong 2018-12-29 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong 2018-12-29 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong 2018-12-29 6:19 ` Julia Lawall 2018-12-29 6:19 ` Julia Lawall 2018-12-29 6:19 ` Julia Lawall 2018-12-29 6:19 ` Julia Lawall 2018-12-29 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong 2018-12-27 13:40 ` Dan Carpenter
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.