All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>, <mars.cheng@mediatek.com>,
	<eddie.huang@mediatek.com>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Erin Lo <erin.lo@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8183: add binding document
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:44:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1550483089.4739.28.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b221339-3933-2a25-ab60-d4d772d2873a@gmail.com>

On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 10:35 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 15/02/2019 07:02, Erin Lo wrote:
> > From: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > The commit adds mt8183 compatible node in binding document.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Erin Lo <erin.lo@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 115 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..364e673
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
> > +* Mediatek MT8183 Pin Controller
> > +
> > +The Mediatek's Pin controller is used to control SoC pins.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: value should be one of the following.
> > +	"mediatek,mt8183-pinctrl", compatible with mt8183 pinctrl.
> > +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a gpio controller.
> > +- #gpio-cells: number of cells in GPIO specifier. Since the generic GPIO
> > +  binding is used, the amount of cells must be specified as 2. See the below
> > +  mentioned gpio binding representation for description of particular cells.
> > +- gpio-ranges : gpio valid number range.
> > +- reg: physicall address base for gpio base registers. There are nine
> 
> s/physicall/physical

==>we will modify it.
> 
> > +  physicall address base in mt8183. They are 0x10005000, 0x11F20000,
> > +  0x11E80000, 0x11E70000, 0x11E90000, 0x11D30000, 0x11D20000, 0x11C50000,
> > +  0x11F30000.
> > +
> > +	Eg: <&pio 6 0>
> > +	<[phandle of the gpio controller node]
> > +	[line number within the gpio controller]
> > +	[flags]>
> > +
> > +	Values for gpio specifier:
> > +	- Line number: is a value between 0 to 202.
> > +	- Flags:  bit field of flags, as defined in <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>.
> > +            Only the following flags are supported:
> > +            0 - GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH
> > +            1 - GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- reg-names: gpio base register names. There are nine gpio base register
> > +  names in mt8183. They are "iocfg0", "iocfg1", "iocfg2", "iocfg3", "iocfg4",
> > +  "iocfg5", "iocfg6", "iocfg7", "iocfg8".
> > +- interrupt-controller: Marks the device node as an interrupt controller
> > +- #interrupt-cells: Should be two.
> > +- interrupts : The interrupt outputs from the controller.
> 
> we are missing interrupt-parent here.

==> we will add it in next version. we will add like this:
- interrupts-parents : The interrupt connector. In mt8183, it is sysirq.

> 
> > +
> > +Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt in this directory for details of the
> > +common pinctrl bindings used by client devices.
> > +
> > +Subnode format
> > +A pinctrl node should contain at least one subnodes representing the
> > +pinctrl groups available on the machine. Each subnode will list the
> > +pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer
> > +configuration, pullups, drive strength, input enable/disable and input schmitt.
> > +
> > +    node {
> > +	pinmux = <PIN_NUMBER_PINMUX>;
> > +	GENERIC_PINCONFIG;
> > +    };
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- pinmux: integer array, represents gpio pin number and mux setting.
> > +    Supported pin number and mux varies for different SoCs, and are defined
> > +    as macros in boot/dts/<soc>-pinfunc.h directly.
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- GENERIC_PINCONFIG: is the generic pinconfig options to use, bias-disable,
> > +    bias-pull-down, bias-pull-up, input-enable, input-disable, output-low, output-high,
> > +    input-schmitt-enable, input-schmitt-disable and drive-strength are valid.
> > +
> > +    Some special pins have extra pull up strength, there are R0 and R1 pull-up
> > +    resistors available, but for user, it's only need to set R1R0 as 00, 01, 10 or 11.
> > +    So when config mediatek,pull-up-adv or mediatek,pull-down-adv,
> > +    it support arguments for those special pins.
> 
> I wonder if we should mention which this special pins are. A look at the driver
> told me that it is not possible to know that by reading the source code neither.
> Linus, what do you think?
> 
> What about mediatek,tdsel and mediatek,rdsel? They are not supported?
> 
> Wouldn't it make sense to have one binding description for paris and then just
> create SoC specifics bindings?
==> It can support mediatek,tdsel and mediatek,rdsel in mt8183 design.
I will try to create one new binding description and separate it from
soc specifics bindings.

> 
> > +
> > +    When config drive-strength, it can support some arguments, such as
> > +    MTK_DRIVE_4mA, MTK_DRIVE_6mA, etc. See dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h.
> 
> It can support all drive strength defined in that header file, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,
> 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28 and 32 mA?

==>It can only support drive strength 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16mA in mt8183. 

> 
> > +
> > +Examples:
> > +
> > +#include "mt8183-pinfunc.h"
> > +
> > +...
> > +{
> > +	pio: pinctrl@10005000 {
> > +		compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-pinctrl";
> > +		reg = <0 0x10005000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11F20000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11E80000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11E70000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11E90000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11D30000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11D20000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11C50000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11F30000 0 0x1000>;
> > +		reg-names = "iocfg0", "iocfg1", "iocfg2",
> > +			    "iocfg3", "iocfg4", "iocfg5",
> > +			    "iocfg6", "iocfg7", "iocfg8";
> > +		gpio-controller;
> > +		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> > +		gpio-ranges = <&pio 0 0 192>;
> > +		interrupt-controller;
> > +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 153 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +		interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > +		#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > +		i2c0_pins_a: i2c0 {
> > +			pins1 {
> > +				pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO48__FUNC_SCL5>,
> > +					 <PINMUX_GPIO49__FUNC_SDA5>;
> > +				mediatek,pull-up-adv = <11>;
> > +			};
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		i2c1_pins_a: i2c1 {
> > +			pins {
> > +				pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO50__FUNC_SCL3>,
> > +					 <PINMUX_GPIO51__FUNC_SDA3>;
> > +				mediatek,pull-down-adv = <10>;
> > +			};
> > +		};
> > +		...
> > +	};
> > +};
> > 



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com,
	mars.cheng@mediatek.com, eddie.huang@mediatek.com,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Erin Lo <erin.lo@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8183: add binding document
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:44:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1550483089.4739.28.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b221339-3933-2a25-ab60-d4d772d2873a@gmail.com>

On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 10:35 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 15/02/2019 07:02, Erin Lo wrote:
> > From: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > The commit adds mt8183 compatible node in binding document.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Erin Lo <erin.lo@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 115 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..364e673
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
> > +* Mediatek MT8183 Pin Controller
> > +
> > +The Mediatek's Pin controller is used to control SoC pins.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: value should be one of the following.
> > +	"mediatek,mt8183-pinctrl", compatible with mt8183 pinctrl.
> > +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a gpio controller.
> > +- #gpio-cells: number of cells in GPIO specifier. Since the generic GPIO
> > +  binding is used, the amount of cells must be specified as 2. See the below
> > +  mentioned gpio binding representation for description of particular cells.
> > +- gpio-ranges : gpio valid number range.
> > +- reg: physicall address base for gpio base registers. There are nine
> 
> s/physicall/physical

==>we will modify it.
> 
> > +  physicall address base in mt8183. They are 0x10005000, 0x11F20000,
> > +  0x11E80000, 0x11E70000, 0x11E90000, 0x11D30000, 0x11D20000, 0x11C50000,
> > +  0x11F30000.
> > +
> > +	Eg: <&pio 6 0>
> > +	<[phandle of the gpio controller node]
> > +	[line number within the gpio controller]
> > +	[flags]>
> > +
> > +	Values for gpio specifier:
> > +	- Line number: is a value between 0 to 202.
> > +	- Flags:  bit field of flags, as defined in <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>.
> > +            Only the following flags are supported:
> > +            0 - GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH
> > +            1 - GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- reg-names: gpio base register names. There are nine gpio base register
> > +  names in mt8183. They are "iocfg0", "iocfg1", "iocfg2", "iocfg3", "iocfg4",
> > +  "iocfg5", "iocfg6", "iocfg7", "iocfg8".
> > +- interrupt-controller: Marks the device node as an interrupt controller
> > +- #interrupt-cells: Should be two.
> > +- interrupts : The interrupt outputs from the controller.
> 
> we are missing interrupt-parent here.

==> we will add it in next version. we will add like this:
- interrupts-parents : The interrupt connector. In mt8183, it is sysirq.

> 
> > +
> > +Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt in this directory for details of the
> > +common pinctrl bindings used by client devices.
> > +
> > +Subnode format
> > +A pinctrl node should contain at least one subnodes representing the
> > +pinctrl groups available on the machine. Each subnode will list the
> > +pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer
> > +configuration, pullups, drive strength, input enable/disable and input schmitt.
> > +
> > +    node {
> > +	pinmux = <PIN_NUMBER_PINMUX>;
> > +	GENERIC_PINCONFIG;
> > +    };
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- pinmux: integer array, represents gpio pin number and mux setting.
> > +    Supported pin number and mux varies for different SoCs, and are defined
> > +    as macros in boot/dts/<soc>-pinfunc.h directly.
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- GENERIC_PINCONFIG: is the generic pinconfig options to use, bias-disable,
> > +    bias-pull-down, bias-pull-up, input-enable, input-disable, output-low, output-high,
> > +    input-schmitt-enable, input-schmitt-disable and drive-strength are valid.
> > +
> > +    Some special pins have extra pull up strength, there are R0 and R1 pull-up
> > +    resistors available, but for user, it's only need to set R1R0 as 00, 01, 10 or 11.
> > +    So when config mediatek,pull-up-adv or mediatek,pull-down-adv,
> > +    it support arguments for those special pins.
> 
> I wonder if we should mention which this special pins are. A look at the driver
> told me that it is not possible to know that by reading the source code neither.
> Linus, what do you think?
> 
> What about mediatek,tdsel and mediatek,rdsel? They are not supported?
> 
> Wouldn't it make sense to have one binding description for paris and then just
> create SoC specifics bindings?
==> It can support mediatek,tdsel and mediatek,rdsel in mt8183 design.
I will try to create one new binding description and separate it from
soc specifics bindings.

> 
> > +
> > +    When config drive-strength, it can support some arguments, such as
> > +    MTK_DRIVE_4mA, MTK_DRIVE_6mA, etc. See dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h.
> 
> It can support all drive strength defined in that header file, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,
> 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28 and 32 mA?

==>It can only support drive strength 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16mA in mt8183. 

> 
> > +
> > +Examples:
> > +
> > +#include "mt8183-pinfunc.h"
> > +
> > +...
> > +{
> > +	pio: pinctrl@10005000 {
> > +		compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-pinctrl";
> > +		reg = <0 0x10005000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11F20000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11E80000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11E70000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11E90000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11D30000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11D20000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11C50000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11F30000 0 0x1000>;
> > +		reg-names = "iocfg0", "iocfg1", "iocfg2",
> > +			    "iocfg3", "iocfg4", "iocfg5",
> > +			    "iocfg6", "iocfg7", "iocfg8";
> > +		gpio-controller;
> > +		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> > +		gpio-ranges = <&pio 0 0 192>;
> > +		interrupt-controller;
> > +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 153 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +		interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > +		#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > +		i2c0_pins_a: i2c0 {
> > +			pins1 {
> > +				pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO48__FUNC_SCL5>,
> > +					 <PINMUX_GPIO49__FUNC_SDA5>;
> > +				mediatek,pull-up-adv = <11>;
> > +			};
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		i2c1_pins_a: i2c1 {
> > +			pins {
> > +				pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO50__FUNC_SCL3>,
> > +					 <PINMUX_GPIO51__FUNC_SDA3>;
> > +				mediatek,pull-down-adv = <10>;
> > +			};
> > +		};
> > +		...
> > +	};
> > +};
> > 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	mars.cheng@mediatek.com, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Erin Lo <erin.lo@mediatek.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	eddie.huang@mediatek.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8183: add binding document
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:44:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1550483089.4739.28.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b221339-3933-2a25-ab60-d4d772d2873a@gmail.com>

On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 10:35 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 15/02/2019 07:02, Erin Lo wrote:
> > From: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > The commit adds mt8183 compatible node in binding document.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Erin Lo <erin.lo@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 115 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..364e673
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
> > +* Mediatek MT8183 Pin Controller
> > +
> > +The Mediatek's Pin controller is used to control SoC pins.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: value should be one of the following.
> > +	"mediatek,mt8183-pinctrl", compatible with mt8183 pinctrl.
> > +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a gpio controller.
> > +- #gpio-cells: number of cells in GPIO specifier. Since the generic GPIO
> > +  binding is used, the amount of cells must be specified as 2. See the below
> > +  mentioned gpio binding representation for description of particular cells.
> > +- gpio-ranges : gpio valid number range.
> > +- reg: physicall address base for gpio base registers. There are nine
> 
> s/physicall/physical

==>we will modify it.
> 
> > +  physicall address base in mt8183. They are 0x10005000, 0x11F20000,
> > +  0x11E80000, 0x11E70000, 0x11E90000, 0x11D30000, 0x11D20000, 0x11C50000,
> > +  0x11F30000.
> > +
> > +	Eg: <&pio 6 0>
> > +	<[phandle of the gpio controller node]
> > +	[line number within the gpio controller]
> > +	[flags]>
> > +
> > +	Values for gpio specifier:
> > +	- Line number: is a value between 0 to 202.
> > +	- Flags:  bit field of flags, as defined in <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>.
> > +            Only the following flags are supported:
> > +            0 - GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH
> > +            1 - GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- reg-names: gpio base register names. There are nine gpio base register
> > +  names in mt8183. They are "iocfg0", "iocfg1", "iocfg2", "iocfg3", "iocfg4",
> > +  "iocfg5", "iocfg6", "iocfg7", "iocfg8".
> > +- interrupt-controller: Marks the device node as an interrupt controller
> > +- #interrupt-cells: Should be two.
> > +- interrupts : The interrupt outputs from the controller.
> 
> we are missing interrupt-parent here.

==> we will add it in next version. we will add like this:
- interrupts-parents : The interrupt connector. In mt8183, it is sysirq.

> 
> > +
> > +Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt in this directory for details of the
> > +common pinctrl bindings used by client devices.
> > +
> > +Subnode format
> > +A pinctrl node should contain at least one subnodes representing the
> > +pinctrl groups available on the machine. Each subnode will list the
> > +pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer
> > +configuration, pullups, drive strength, input enable/disable and input schmitt.
> > +
> > +    node {
> > +	pinmux = <PIN_NUMBER_PINMUX>;
> > +	GENERIC_PINCONFIG;
> > +    };
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- pinmux: integer array, represents gpio pin number and mux setting.
> > +    Supported pin number and mux varies for different SoCs, and are defined
> > +    as macros in boot/dts/<soc>-pinfunc.h directly.
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- GENERIC_PINCONFIG: is the generic pinconfig options to use, bias-disable,
> > +    bias-pull-down, bias-pull-up, input-enable, input-disable, output-low, output-high,
> > +    input-schmitt-enable, input-schmitt-disable and drive-strength are valid.
> > +
> > +    Some special pins have extra pull up strength, there are R0 and R1 pull-up
> > +    resistors available, but for user, it's only need to set R1R0 as 00, 01, 10 or 11.
> > +    So when config mediatek,pull-up-adv or mediatek,pull-down-adv,
> > +    it support arguments for those special pins.
> 
> I wonder if we should mention which this special pins are. A look at the driver
> told me that it is not possible to know that by reading the source code neither.
> Linus, what do you think?
> 
> What about mediatek,tdsel and mediatek,rdsel? They are not supported?
> 
> Wouldn't it make sense to have one binding description for paris and then just
> create SoC specifics bindings?
==> It can support mediatek,tdsel and mediatek,rdsel in mt8183 design.
I will try to create one new binding description and separate it from
soc specifics bindings.

> 
> > +
> > +    When config drive-strength, it can support some arguments, such as
> > +    MTK_DRIVE_4mA, MTK_DRIVE_6mA, etc. See dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h.
> 
> It can support all drive strength defined in that header file, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,
> 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28 and 32 mA?

==>It can only support drive strength 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16mA in mt8183. 

> 
> > +
> > +Examples:
> > +
> > +#include "mt8183-pinfunc.h"
> > +
> > +...
> > +{
> > +	pio: pinctrl@10005000 {
> > +		compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-pinctrl";
> > +		reg = <0 0x10005000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11F20000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11E80000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11E70000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11E90000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11D30000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11D20000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11C50000 0 0x1000>,
> > +		      <0 0x11F30000 0 0x1000>;
> > +		reg-names = "iocfg0", "iocfg1", "iocfg2",
> > +			    "iocfg3", "iocfg4", "iocfg5",
> > +			    "iocfg6", "iocfg7", "iocfg8";
> > +		gpio-controller;
> > +		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> > +		gpio-ranges = <&pio 0 0 192>;
> > +		interrupt-controller;
> > +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 153 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +		interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > +		#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > +		i2c0_pins_a: i2c0 {
> > +			pins1 {
> > +				pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO48__FUNC_SCL5>,
> > +					 <PINMUX_GPIO49__FUNC_SDA5>;
> > +				mediatek,pull-up-adv = <11>;
> > +			};
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		i2c1_pins_a: i2c1 {
> > +			pins {
> > +				pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO50__FUNC_SCL3>,
> > +					 <PINMUX_GPIO51__FUNC_SDA3>;
> > +				mediatek,pull-down-adv = <10>;
> > +			};
> > +		};
> > +		...
> > +	};
> > +};
> > 



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-18  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-15  6:02 [PATCH v7 0/6] Add basic and clock support for Mediatek MT8183 SoC Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02 ` Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02 ` Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: mtk-sysirq: Add compatible for Mediatek MT8183 Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02   ` Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02   ` Erin Lo
2019-02-15  7:21   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-02-15  7:21     ` Matthias Brugger
2019-02-15  8:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-15  8:57       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-15 10:08   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-02-15 10:08     ` Matthias Brugger
2019-02-15  6:02 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] dt-bindings: serial: " Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02   ` Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02   ` Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8183: add binding document Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02   ` Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02   ` Erin Lo
2019-02-15  9:35   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-02-15  9:35     ` Matthias Brugger
2019-02-18  9:44     ` Zhiyong Tao [this message]
2019-02-18  9:44       ` Zhiyong Tao
2019-02-18  9:44       ` Zhiyong Tao
2019-02-18 15:48     ` Rob Herring
2019-02-18 15:48       ` Rob Herring
2019-02-18 16:32   ` Rob Herring
2019-02-18 16:32     ` Rob Herring
2019-02-19  2:45     ` Zhiyong Tao
2019-02-19  2:45       ` Zhiyong Tao
2019-02-19  2:45       ` Zhiyong Tao
2019-02-19 15:21       ` Rob Herring
2019-02-19 15:21         ` Rob Herring
2019-02-19 15:21         ` Rob Herring
2019-02-15  6:02 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] arm64: dts: Add Mediatek SoC MT8183 and evaluation board dts and Makefile Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02   ` Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02   ` Erin Lo
2019-02-18  6:10   ` Erin Lo
2019-02-18  6:10     ` Erin Lo
2019-02-18  6:10     ` Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] arm64: dts: mt8183: add pintcrl file Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02   ` Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02   ` Erin Lo
2019-02-18 16:33   ` Rob Herring
2019-02-18 16:33     ` Rob Herring
2019-02-19  7:45   ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-02-19  7:45     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-02-19  7:45     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-02-15  6:02 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] arm64: dts: mt8183: add spi node Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02   ` Erin Lo
2019-02-15  6:02   ` Erin Lo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1550483089.4739.28.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
    --to=zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=erin.lo@mediatek.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mars.cheng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.