WTF: patch "[PATCH] net: wireless: ti: wl1251 use new SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI_WL1251" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.4-stable tree?

WTF: patch "[PATCH] net: wireless: ti: wl1251 use new SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI_WL1251" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.4-stable tree?

[gregkh]

The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 5.4-stable tree.

I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst.

I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to 
<stable@vger.kernel.org> and let me know why this patch should be
applied.  Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
seen again.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From d8620bbc32541a30f84154007defad917f5179f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:30:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] net: wireless: ti: wl1251 use new SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI_WL1251
 definition

SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI_WL1251 is now defined in mmc/sdio_ids.h separately
from SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI for wl1271.

Fixes: 884f38607897 ("mmc: core: move some sdio IDs out of quirks file")
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>
Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.11+
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c
index f1224b948f83..ac677309dab6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static void wl1251_sdio_interrupt(struct sdio_func *func)
 }
 
 static const struct sdio_device_id wl1251_devices[] = {
-	{ SDIO_DEVICE(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_TI_WL1251) },
+	{ SDIO_DEVICE(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI_WL1251, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_TI_WL1251) },
 	{}
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, wl1251_devices);