All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <maz@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Sj Huang" <sj.huang@mediatek.com>, <youlin.pei@mediatek.com>,
	<chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com>, <qizhong.cheng@mediatek.com>,
	<sin_jieyang@mediatek.com>, <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	<Rex-BC.Chen@mediatek.com>, <anson.chuang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [v8,3/7] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add MediaTek Gen3 driver for MT8192
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:31:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1616463094.25961.8.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210319185341.nyxmo7nwii5fzsxc@pali>

On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 19:53 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2021 13:48:07 Jianjun Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 01:02 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Saturday 13 March 2021 15:43:14 Jianjun Wang wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 13:38 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday 24 February 2021 14:11:28 Jianjun Wang wrote:
> > > > > > +static int mtk_pcie_startup_port(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > ...
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* Delay 100ms to wait the reference clocks become stable */
> > > > > > +	msleep(100);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* De-assert PERST# signal */
> > > > > > +	val &= ~PCIE_PE_RSTB;
> > > > > > +	writel_relaxed(val, port->base + PCIE_RST_CTRL_REG);
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hello! This is a new driver which introduce yet another custom timeout
> > > > > prior PERST# signal for PCIe card is de-asserted. Timeouts for other
> > > > > drivers I collected in older email [2].
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please look at my email [1] about PCIe Warm Reset if you have any clue
> > > > > about it. Lorenzo and Rob already expressed that this timeout should not
> > > > > be driver specific. But nobody was able to "decode" and "understand"
> > > > > PCIe spec yet about these timeouts.
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Pali,
> > > > 
> > > > I think this is more like a platform specific timeout, which is used to
> > > > wait for the reference clocks to become stable and finish the reset flow
> > > > of HW blocks.
> > > > 
> > > > Here is the steps to start a link training in this HW:
> > > > 
> > > > 1. Assert all reset signals which including the transaction layer, PIPE
> > > > interface and internal bus interface;
> > > > 
> > > > 2. De-assert reset signals except the PERST#, this will make the
> > > > physical layer active and start to output the reference clock, but the
> > > > EP device remains in the reset state.
> > > >    Before releasing the PERST# signal, the HW blocks needs at least 10ms
> > > > to finish the reset flow, and ref-clk needs about 30us to become stable.
> > > > 
> > > > 3. De-assert PERST# signal, wait LTSSM enter L0 state.
> > > > 
> > > > This 100ms timeout is reference to TPVPERL in the PCIe CEM spec. Since
> > > > we are in the kernel stage, the power supply has already stabled, this
> > > > timeout may not take that long.
> > > 
> > > I think that this is not platform specific timeout or platform specific
> > > steps. This matches generic steps as defined in PCIe CEM spec, section
> > > 2.2.1. Initial Power-Up (G3 to S0).
> > > 
> > > What is platform specific is just how to achieve these steps.
> > > 
> > > Am I right?
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > TPVPERL is one of my timeout candidates as minimal required timeout for
> > > Warm Reset. I have wrote it in email:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20200430082245.xblvb7xeamm4e336@pali/
> > > 
> > > But I'm not sure as specially in none diagram is described just warm
> > > reset as defined in mPCIe CEM (3.2.4.3. PERST# Signal).
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > Anyway, I would suggest to define constants for those timeouts. I guess
> > > that in future we could be able to define "generic" timeout constants
> > > which would not be in private driver section, but in some common header
> > > file.
> > 
> > I agree with this, but I'm not sure if we really need that long time in
> > the kernel stage, because the power supply has already stable and it's
> > really impact the boot time, especially when the platform have multi
> > ports and not connect any EP device, we need to wait 200ms for each port
> > when system bootup.
> 
> Ports are independent. So you can initialize them in parallel, right?
> 
> If you initialize each port in separate worker then during msleep calls
> kernel can schedule other kernel thread to run and so it does not
> increase boot time. While pcie is sleeping kernel can do other things.
> So the result is that whole boot time is not increased, just reordered.
> 
> > For this PCIe controller driver, I would like to change the timeout
> > value to 10ms to comply with the HW design, and save some boot time.
> 
> In case you can connect _any_ PCIe card to your HW then you cannot
> decrease or change timeouts required by PCIe specs. Otherwise there can
> be a card which would not be initialized correctly.
> 
> I'm debugging driver for aardvark PCIe controller and I see that Compex
> cards really needs these timeouts, otherwise link is down and card
> cannot be detected.
> 
> So I guess that there can be also other cards which requires other
> timeouts as specified in PCIe specs.

OK, I'll keep this timeout value. 

One more question, is there any chance that we can put this linkup flow
to a more "standard" way, such as drivers provides the ops of the PERST#
pin and let the framework to decide how to start a link training, or we
just use macro to replace this timeout value in the future?

Thanks.

> 
> > > 
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* Check if the link is up or not */
> > > > > > +	err = readl_poll_timeout(port->base + PCIE_LINK_STATUS_REG, val,
> > > > > > +				 !!(val & PCIE_PORT_LINKUP), 20,
> > > > > > +				 50 * USEC_PER_MSEC);
> > > > > 
> > > > > IIRC, you need to wait at least 100ms after de-asserting PERST# signal
> > > > > as it is required by PCIe specs and also because experiments proved that
> > > > > some Compex wifi cards (e.g. WLE900VX) are not detected if you do not
> > > > > wait this minimal time.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, this should be 100ms, I will fix it at next version, thanks for
> > > > your review.
> > > 
> > > In past Bjorn suggested to use msleep(PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT); macro for
> > > this step during reviewing aardvark driver.
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190426161050.GA189964@google.com/
> > > 
> > > And next iteration used this PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT macro instead of 100:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190522213351.21366-2-repk@triplefau.lt/
> > 
> > Sure, I will use PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT macro instead in the next version.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > +	if (err) {
> > > > > > +		val = readl_relaxed(port->base + PCIE_LTSSM_STATUS_REG);
> > > > > > +		dev_err(port->dev, "PCIe link down, ltssm reg val: %#x\n", val);
> > > > > > +		return err;
> > > > > > +	}
> > > > > 
> > > > > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210310110535.zh4pnn4vpmvzwl5q@pali/
> > > > > [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20200424092546.25p3hdtkehohe3xw@pali/
> > > > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <maz@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Sj Huang" <sj.huang@mediatek.com>, <youlin.pei@mediatek.com>,
	<chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com>, <qizhong.cheng@mediatek.com>,
	<sin_jieyang@mediatek.com>, <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	<Rex-BC.Chen@mediatek.com>, <anson.chuang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [v8,3/7] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add MediaTek Gen3 driver for MT8192
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:31:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1616463094.25961.8.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210319185341.nyxmo7nwii5fzsxc@pali>

On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 19:53 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2021 13:48:07 Jianjun Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 01:02 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Saturday 13 March 2021 15:43:14 Jianjun Wang wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 13:38 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday 24 February 2021 14:11:28 Jianjun Wang wrote:
> > > > > > +static int mtk_pcie_startup_port(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > ...
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* Delay 100ms to wait the reference clocks become stable */
> > > > > > +	msleep(100);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* De-assert PERST# signal */
> > > > > > +	val &= ~PCIE_PE_RSTB;
> > > > > > +	writel_relaxed(val, port->base + PCIE_RST_CTRL_REG);
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hello! This is a new driver which introduce yet another custom timeout
> > > > > prior PERST# signal for PCIe card is de-asserted. Timeouts for other
> > > > > drivers I collected in older email [2].
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please look at my email [1] about PCIe Warm Reset if you have any clue
> > > > > about it. Lorenzo and Rob already expressed that this timeout should not
> > > > > be driver specific. But nobody was able to "decode" and "understand"
> > > > > PCIe spec yet about these timeouts.
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Pali,
> > > > 
> > > > I think this is more like a platform specific timeout, which is used to
> > > > wait for the reference clocks to become stable and finish the reset flow
> > > > of HW blocks.
> > > > 
> > > > Here is the steps to start a link training in this HW:
> > > > 
> > > > 1. Assert all reset signals which including the transaction layer, PIPE
> > > > interface and internal bus interface;
> > > > 
> > > > 2. De-assert reset signals except the PERST#, this will make the
> > > > physical layer active and start to output the reference clock, but the
> > > > EP device remains in the reset state.
> > > >    Before releasing the PERST# signal, the HW blocks needs at least 10ms
> > > > to finish the reset flow, and ref-clk needs about 30us to become stable.
> > > > 
> > > > 3. De-assert PERST# signal, wait LTSSM enter L0 state.
> > > > 
> > > > This 100ms timeout is reference to TPVPERL in the PCIe CEM spec. Since
> > > > we are in the kernel stage, the power supply has already stabled, this
> > > > timeout may not take that long.
> > > 
> > > I think that this is not platform specific timeout or platform specific
> > > steps. This matches generic steps as defined in PCIe CEM spec, section
> > > 2.2.1. Initial Power-Up (G3 to S0).
> > > 
> > > What is platform specific is just how to achieve these steps.
> > > 
> > > Am I right?
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > TPVPERL is one of my timeout candidates as minimal required timeout for
> > > Warm Reset. I have wrote it in email:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20200430082245.xblvb7xeamm4e336@pali/
> > > 
> > > But I'm not sure as specially in none diagram is described just warm
> > > reset as defined in mPCIe CEM (3.2.4.3. PERST# Signal).
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > Anyway, I would suggest to define constants for those timeouts. I guess
> > > that in future we could be able to define "generic" timeout constants
> > > which would not be in private driver section, but in some common header
> > > file.
> > 
> > I agree with this, but I'm not sure if we really need that long time in
> > the kernel stage, because the power supply has already stable and it's
> > really impact the boot time, especially when the platform have multi
> > ports and not connect any EP device, we need to wait 200ms for each port
> > when system bootup.
> 
> Ports are independent. So you can initialize them in parallel, right?
> 
> If you initialize each port in separate worker then during msleep calls
> kernel can schedule other kernel thread to run and so it does not
> increase boot time. While pcie is sleeping kernel can do other things.
> So the result is that whole boot time is not increased, just reordered.
> 
> > For this PCIe controller driver, I would like to change the timeout
> > value to 10ms to comply with the HW design, and save some boot time.
> 
> In case you can connect _any_ PCIe card to your HW then you cannot
> decrease or change timeouts required by PCIe specs. Otherwise there can
> be a card which would not be initialized correctly.
> 
> I'm debugging driver for aardvark PCIe controller and I see that Compex
> cards really needs these timeouts, otherwise link is down and card
> cannot be detected.
> 
> So I guess that there can be also other cards which requires other
> timeouts as specified in PCIe specs.

OK, I'll keep this timeout value. 

One more question, is there any chance that we can put this linkup flow
to a more "standard" way, such as drivers provides the ops of the PERST#
pin and let the framework to decide how to start a link training, or we
just use macro to replace this timeout value in the future?

Thanks.

> 
> > > 
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* Check if the link is up or not */
> > > > > > +	err = readl_poll_timeout(port->base + PCIE_LINK_STATUS_REG, val,
> > > > > > +				 !!(val & PCIE_PORT_LINKUP), 20,
> > > > > > +				 50 * USEC_PER_MSEC);
> > > > > 
> > > > > IIRC, you need to wait at least 100ms after de-asserting PERST# signal
> > > > > as it is required by PCIe specs and also because experiments proved that
> > > > > some Compex wifi cards (e.g. WLE900VX) are not detected if you do not
> > > > > wait this minimal time.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, this should be 100ms, I will fix it at next version, thanks for
> > > > your review.
> > > 
> > > In past Bjorn suggested to use msleep(PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT); macro for
> > > this step during reviewing aardvark driver.
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190426161050.GA189964@google.com/
> > > 
> > > And next iteration used this PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT macro instead of 100:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190522213351.21366-2-repk@triplefau.lt/
> > 
> > Sure, I will use PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT macro instead in the next version.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > +	if (err) {
> > > > > > +		val = readl_relaxed(port->base + PCIE_LTSSM_STATUS_REG);
> > > > > > +		dev_err(port->dev, "PCIe link down, ltssm reg val: %#x\n", val);
> > > > > > +		return err;
> > > > > > +	}
> > > > > 
> > > > > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210310110535.zh4pnn4vpmvzwl5q@pali/
> > > > > [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20200424092546.25p3hdtkehohe3xw@pali/
> > > > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <maz@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Sj Huang" <sj.huang@mediatek.com>, <youlin.pei@mediatek.com>,
	<chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com>, <qizhong.cheng@mediatek.com>,
	<sin_jieyang@mediatek.com>, <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	<Rex-BC.Chen@mediatek.com>, <anson.chuang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [v8,3/7] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add MediaTek Gen3 driver for MT8192
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:31:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1616463094.25961.8.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210319185341.nyxmo7nwii5fzsxc@pali>

On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 19:53 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2021 13:48:07 Jianjun Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 01:02 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Saturday 13 March 2021 15:43:14 Jianjun Wang wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 13:38 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday 24 February 2021 14:11:28 Jianjun Wang wrote:
> > > > > > +static int mtk_pcie_startup_port(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > ...
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* Delay 100ms to wait the reference clocks become stable */
> > > > > > +	msleep(100);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* De-assert PERST# signal */
> > > > > > +	val &= ~PCIE_PE_RSTB;
> > > > > > +	writel_relaxed(val, port->base + PCIE_RST_CTRL_REG);
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hello! This is a new driver which introduce yet another custom timeout
> > > > > prior PERST# signal for PCIe card is de-asserted. Timeouts for other
> > > > > drivers I collected in older email [2].
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please look at my email [1] about PCIe Warm Reset if you have any clue
> > > > > about it. Lorenzo and Rob already expressed that this timeout should not
> > > > > be driver specific. But nobody was able to "decode" and "understand"
> > > > > PCIe spec yet about these timeouts.
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Pali,
> > > > 
> > > > I think this is more like a platform specific timeout, which is used to
> > > > wait for the reference clocks to become stable and finish the reset flow
> > > > of HW blocks.
> > > > 
> > > > Here is the steps to start a link training in this HW:
> > > > 
> > > > 1. Assert all reset signals which including the transaction layer, PIPE
> > > > interface and internal bus interface;
> > > > 
> > > > 2. De-assert reset signals except the PERST#, this will make the
> > > > physical layer active and start to output the reference clock, but the
> > > > EP device remains in the reset state.
> > > >    Before releasing the PERST# signal, the HW blocks needs at least 10ms
> > > > to finish the reset flow, and ref-clk needs about 30us to become stable.
> > > > 
> > > > 3. De-assert PERST# signal, wait LTSSM enter L0 state.
> > > > 
> > > > This 100ms timeout is reference to TPVPERL in the PCIe CEM spec. Since
> > > > we are in the kernel stage, the power supply has already stabled, this
> > > > timeout may not take that long.
> > > 
> > > I think that this is not platform specific timeout or platform specific
> > > steps. This matches generic steps as defined in PCIe CEM spec, section
> > > 2.2.1. Initial Power-Up (G3 to S0).
> > > 
> > > What is platform specific is just how to achieve these steps.
> > > 
> > > Am I right?
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > TPVPERL is one of my timeout candidates as minimal required timeout for
> > > Warm Reset. I have wrote it in email:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20200430082245.xblvb7xeamm4e336@pali/
> > > 
> > > But I'm not sure as specially in none diagram is described just warm
> > > reset as defined in mPCIe CEM (3.2.4.3. PERST# Signal).
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > Anyway, I would suggest to define constants for those timeouts. I guess
> > > that in future we could be able to define "generic" timeout constants
> > > which would not be in private driver section, but in some common header
> > > file.
> > 
> > I agree with this, but I'm not sure if we really need that long time in
> > the kernel stage, because the power supply has already stable and it's
> > really impact the boot time, especially when the platform have multi
> > ports and not connect any EP device, we need to wait 200ms for each port
> > when system bootup.
> 
> Ports are independent. So you can initialize them in parallel, right?
> 
> If you initialize each port in separate worker then during msleep calls
> kernel can schedule other kernel thread to run and so it does not
> increase boot time. While pcie is sleeping kernel can do other things.
> So the result is that whole boot time is not increased, just reordered.
> 
> > For this PCIe controller driver, I would like to change the timeout
> > value to 10ms to comply with the HW design, and save some boot time.
> 
> In case you can connect _any_ PCIe card to your HW then you cannot
> decrease or change timeouts required by PCIe specs. Otherwise there can
> be a card which would not be initialized correctly.
> 
> I'm debugging driver for aardvark PCIe controller and I see that Compex
> cards really needs these timeouts, otherwise link is down and card
> cannot be detected.
> 
> So I guess that there can be also other cards which requires other
> timeouts as specified in PCIe specs.

OK, I'll keep this timeout value. 

One more question, is there any chance that we can put this linkup flow
to a more "standard" way, such as drivers provides the ops of the PERST#
pin and let the framework to decide how to start a link training, or we
just use macro to replace this timeout value in the future?

Thanks.

> 
> > > 
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* Check if the link is up or not */
> > > > > > +	err = readl_poll_timeout(port->base + PCIE_LINK_STATUS_REG, val,
> > > > > > +				 !!(val & PCIE_PORT_LINKUP), 20,
> > > > > > +				 50 * USEC_PER_MSEC);
> > > > > 
> > > > > IIRC, you need to wait at least 100ms after de-asserting PERST# signal
> > > > > as it is required by PCIe specs and also because experiments proved that
> > > > > some Compex wifi cards (e.g. WLE900VX) are not detected if you do not
> > > > > wait this minimal time.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, this should be 100ms, I will fix it at next version, thanks for
> > > > your review.
> > > 
> > > In past Bjorn suggested to use msleep(PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT); macro for
> > > this step during reviewing aardvark driver.
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190426161050.GA189964@google.com/
> > > 
> > > And next iteration used this PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT macro instead of 100:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190522213351.21366-2-repk@triplefau.lt/
> > 
> > Sure, I will use PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT macro instead in the next version.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > +	if (err) {
> > > > > > +		val = readl_relaxed(port->base + PCIE_LTSSM_STATUS_REG);
> > > > > > +		dev_err(port->dev, "PCIe link down, ltssm reg val: %#x\n", val);
> > > > > > +		return err;
> > > > > > +	}
> > > > > 
> > > > > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210310110535.zh4pnn4vpmvzwl5q@pali/
> > > > > [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20200424092546.25p3hdtkehohe3xw@pali/
> > > > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-23  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-24  6:11 [v8,0/7] PCI: mediatek: Add new generation controller support Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11 ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11 ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11 ` [v8,1/7] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add YAML schema Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-06 20:09   ` Rob Herring
2021-03-06 20:09     ` Rob Herring
2021-03-06 20:09     ` Rob Herring
2021-02-24  6:11 ` [v8,2/7] PCI: Export pci_pio_to_address() for module use Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11 ` [v8,3/7] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add MediaTek Gen3 driver for MT8192 Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24 13:36   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-24 13:36     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-24 13:36     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-25  3:07     ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-25  3:07       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-25  3:07       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-11 12:38   ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-11 12:38     ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-11 12:38     ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-13  7:43     ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-13  7:43       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-13  7:43       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-18  0:02       ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-18  0:02         ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-18  0:02         ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-18  5:48         ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-18  5:48           ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-18  5:48           ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-19 18:53           ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-19 18:53             ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-19 18:53             ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-23  1:31             ` Jianjun Wang [this message]
2021-03-23  1:31               ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-23  1:31               ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-23 14:51               ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-23 14:51                 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-23 14:51                 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-29 22:58           ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-29 22:58             ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-29 22:58             ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-24  6:11 ` [v8,4/7] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add INTx support Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24 14:24   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-24 14:24     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-24 14:24     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-25  3:10     ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-25  3:10       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-25  3:10       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-09 11:10   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-09 11:10     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-09 11:10     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-10  3:05     ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-10  3:05       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-10  3:05       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-10  9:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-10  9:29         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-24  6:11 ` [v8,5/7] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add MSI support Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24 14:31   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-24 14:31     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-24 14:31     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-25  3:09     ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-25  3:09       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-25  3:09       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-09 11:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-09 11:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-09 11:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-10  6:48     ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-10  6:48       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-10  6:48       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-10  9:41       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-10  9:41         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-11  9:47         ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-11  9:47           ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-11  9:47           ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-12  9:14           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-12  9:14             ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-11  0:05   ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-11  0:05     ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-11  0:05     ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-11  8:19     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-11  8:19       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-11  8:19       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-11  9:50       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-11  9:50         ` Jianjun Wang
2021-03-11  9:50         ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11 ` [v8,6/7] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add system PM support Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24 14:10   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-24 14:10     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-24 14:10     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-25  3:34     ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-25  3:34       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-25  3:34       ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-25 22:00       ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-25 22:00         ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-25 22:00         ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-26 10:06         ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-26 10:06           ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-26 10:06           ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11 ` [v8,7/7] MAINTAINERS: Add Jianjun Wang as MediaTek PCI co-maintainer Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang
2021-02-24  6:11   ` Jianjun Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1616463094.25961.8.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
    --to=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Rex-BC.Chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=anson.chuang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=qizhong.cheng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sin_jieyang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sj.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.