All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <dlinkin@nvidia.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <jiri@nvidia.com>,
	<stephen@networkplumber.org>, <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	<vladbu@nvidia.com>, Dmytro Linkin <dlinkin@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 12/18] devlink: Introduce rate nodes
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:52:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1619020385-20220-13-git-send-email-dlinkin@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1619020385-20220-1-git-send-email-dlinkin@nvidia.com>

From: Dmytro Linkin <dlinkin@nvidia.com>

Implement support for DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_{NEW|DEL} commands that are used
to create and delete devlink rate nodes. Add new attribute
DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_NODE_NAME that specify node name string. The node name
is an alphanumeric identifier. No valid node name can be a devlink port
index, eg. decimal number. Extend devlink ops with new callbacks
rate_node_{new|del}() and rate_node_tx_{share|max}_set() to allow
supporting drivers to implement ports rate grouping and setting tx rate
of rate nodes through devlink.
Disallow moving device from switchdev to legacy mode if any node exist
on that device.

Example:

$ devlink port func rate add netdevsim/netdevsim10/group1

$ devlink port func rate set netdevsim/netdevsim10/group1 \
        tx_share 10mbit tx_max 100mbit

Add + set command can be combined:

$ devlink port func rate add netdevsim/netdevsim10/group1 \
        tx_share 10mbit tx_max 100mbit

$ devlink port func rate show netdevsim/netdevsim10/group1
netdevsim/netdevsim10/group1: type node tx_share 10mbit tx_max 100mbit

$ devlink port func rate del netdevsim/netdevsim10/group1

Co-developed-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Linkin <dlinkin@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
---
 include/net/devlink.h        |  13 ++-
 include/uapi/linux/devlink.h |   3 +
 net/core/devlink.c           | 209 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
index cbfa456..ac0b5eb 100644
--- a/include/net/devlink.h
+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
@@ -140,7 +140,10 @@ struct devlink_rate {
 	u64 tx_share;
 	u64 tx_max;
 
-	struct devlink_port *devlink_port;
+	union {
+		struct devlink_port *devlink_port;
+		char *name;
+	};
 };
 
 struct devlink_port {
@@ -1473,6 +1476,14 @@ struct devlink_ops {
 				      u64 tx_share, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
 	int (*rate_leaf_tx_max_set)(struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate, void *priv,
 				    u64 tx_max, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+	int (*rate_node_tx_share_set)(struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate, void *priv,
+				      u64 tx_share, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+	int (*rate_node_tx_max_set)(struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate, void *priv,
+				    u64 tx_max, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+	int (*rate_node_new)(struct devlink_rate *rate_node, void **priv,
+			     struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+	int (*rate_node_del)(struct devlink_rate *rate_node, void *priv,
+			     struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
 };
 
 static inline void *devlink_priv(struct devlink *devlink)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
index ae94cd2..7e15853 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
@@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ enum devlink_port_flavour {
 
 enum devlink_rate_type {
 	DEVLINK_RATE_TYPE_LEAF,
+	DEVLINK_RATE_TYPE_NODE,
 };
 
 enum devlink_param_cmode {
@@ -547,6 +548,8 @@ enum devlink_attr {
 	DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TYPE,			/* u16 */
 	DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TX_SHARE,		/* u64 */
 	DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TX_MAX,		/* u64 */
+	DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_NODE_NAME,		/* string */
+
 	/* add new attributes above here, update the policy in devlink.c */
 
 	__DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX,
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index 4f0412e..eca3f28 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ static struct devlink_port *devlink_port_get_from_info(struct devlink *devlink,
 	return devlink_rate->type == DEVLINK_RATE_TYPE_LEAF;
 }
 
+static inline bool
+devlink_rate_is_node(struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate)
+{
+	return devlink_rate->type == DEVLINK_RATE_TYPE_NODE;
+}
+
 static struct devlink_rate *
 devlink_rate_leaf_get_from_info(struct devlink *devlink, struct genl_info *info)
 {
@@ -209,6 +215,55 @@ static struct devlink_port *devlink_port_get_from_info(struct devlink *devlink,
 	return devlink_rate ?: ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
 }
 
+static struct devlink_rate *
+devlink_rate_node_get_by_name(struct devlink *devlink, const char *node_name)
+{
+	static struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(devlink_rate, &devlink->rate_list, list) {
+		if (devlink_rate_is_node(devlink_rate) &&
+		    !strcmp(node_name, devlink_rate->name))
+			return devlink_rate;
+	}
+	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+}
+
+static struct devlink_rate *
+devlink_rate_node_get_from_attrs(struct devlink *devlink, struct nlattr **attrs)
+{
+	const char *rate_node_name;
+	size_t len;
+
+	if (!attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_NODE_NAME])
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	rate_node_name = nla_data(attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_NODE_NAME]);
+	len = strlen(rate_node_name);
+	/* Name cannot be empty or decimal number */
+	if (!len || strspn(rate_node_name, "0123456789") == len)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+	return devlink_rate_node_get_by_name(devlink, rate_node_name);
+}
+
+static struct devlink_rate *
+devlink_rate_node_get_from_info(struct devlink *devlink, struct genl_info *info)
+{
+	return devlink_rate_node_get_from_attrs(devlink, info->attrs);
+}
+
+static struct devlink_rate *
+devlink_rate_get_from_info(struct devlink *devlink, struct genl_info *info)
+{
+	struct nlattr **attrs = info->attrs;
+
+	if (attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_INDEX])
+		return devlink_rate_leaf_get_from_info(devlink, info);
+	else if (attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_NODE_NAME])
+		return devlink_rate_node_get_from_info(devlink, info);
+	else
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+}
+
 struct devlink_sb {
 	struct list_head list;
 	unsigned int index;
@@ -428,12 +483,13 @@ struct devlink_snapshot {
 #define DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_PORT		BIT(0)
 #define DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_DEVLINK_OR_PORT	BIT(1)
 #define DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_RATE		BIT(2)
+#define DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_RATE_NODE		BIT(3)
 
 /* The per devlink instance lock is taken by default in the pre-doit
  * operation, yet several commands do not require this. The global
  * devlink lock is taken and protects from disruption by user-calls.
  */
-#define DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NO_LOCK			BIT(3)
+#define DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NO_LOCK			BIT(4)
 
 static int devlink_nl_pre_doit(const struct genl_ops *ops,
 			       struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
@@ -465,12 +521,21 @@ static int devlink_nl_pre_doit(const struct genl_ops *ops,
 	} else if (ops->internal_flags & DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_RATE) {
 		struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate;
 
-		devlink_rate = devlink_rate_leaf_get_from_info(devlink, info);
+		devlink_rate = devlink_rate_get_from_info(devlink, info);
 		if (IS_ERR(devlink_rate)) {
 			err = PTR_ERR(devlink_rate);
 			goto unlock;
 		}
 		info->user_ptr[1] = devlink_rate;
+	} else if (ops->internal_flags & DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_RATE_NODE) {
+		struct devlink_rate *rate_node;
+
+		rate_node = devlink_rate_node_get_from_info(devlink, info);
+		if (IS_ERR(rate_node)) {
+			err = PTR_ERR(rate_node);
+			goto unlock;
+		}
+		info->user_ptr[1] = rate_node;
 	}
 	return 0;
 
@@ -801,6 +866,10 @@ static int devlink_nl_rate_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
 		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_INDEX,
 				devlink_rate->devlink_port->index))
 			goto nla_put_failure;
+	} else if (devlink_rate_is_node(devlink_rate)) {
+		if (nla_put_string(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_NODE_NAME,
+				   devlink_rate->name))
+			goto nla_put_failure;
 	}
 
 	if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TX_SHARE,
@@ -1513,8 +1582,12 @@ static int devlink_nl_rate_set(struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate,
 
 	if (attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TX_SHARE]) {
 		rate = nla_get_u64(attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TX_SHARE]);
-		err = ops->rate_leaf_tx_share_set(devlink_rate, devlink_rate->priv,
-						  rate, info->extack);
+		if (devlink_rate_is_leaf(devlink_rate))
+			err = ops->rate_leaf_tx_share_set(devlink_rate, devlink_rate->priv,
+							  rate, info->extack);
+		else if (devlink_rate_is_node(devlink_rate))
+			err = ops->rate_node_tx_share_set(devlink_rate, devlink_rate->priv,
+							  rate, info->extack);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 		devlink_rate->tx_share = rate;
@@ -1522,8 +1595,12 @@ static int devlink_nl_rate_set(struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate,
 
 	if (attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TX_MAX]) {
 		rate = nla_get_u64(attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TX_MAX]);
-		err = ops->rate_leaf_tx_max_set(devlink_rate, devlink_rate->priv,
-						rate, info->extack);
+		if (devlink_rate_is_leaf(devlink_rate))
+			err = ops->rate_leaf_tx_max_set(devlink_rate, devlink_rate->priv,
+							rate, info->extack);
+		else if (devlink_rate_is_node(devlink_rate))
+			err = ops->rate_node_tx_max_set(devlink_rate, devlink_rate->priv,
+							rate, info->extack);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 		devlink_rate->tx_max = rate;
@@ -1547,6 +1624,15 @@ static bool devlink_rate_set_ops_supported(const struct devlink_ops *ops,
 			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "TX max set isn't supported for the leafs");
 			return false;
 		}
+	} else if (type == DEVLINK_RATE_TYPE_NODE) {
+		if (attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TX_SHARE] && !ops->rate_node_tx_share_set) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "TX share set isn't supported for the nodes");
+			return false;
+		}
+		if (attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TX_MAX] && !ops->rate_node_tx_max_set) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "TX max set isn't supported for the nodes");
+			return false;
+		}
 	} else {
 		WARN_ON("Unknown type of rate object");
 		return false;
@@ -1573,6 +1659,78 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_rate_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int devlink_nl_cmd_rate_new_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
+					struct genl_info *info)
+{
+	struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
+	struct devlink_rate *rate_node;
+	const struct devlink_ops *ops;
+	int err;
+
+	ops = devlink->ops;
+	if (!ops || !ops->rate_node_new || !ops->rate_node_del) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Rate nodes aren't supported");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	if (!devlink_rate_set_ops_supported(ops, info, DEVLINK_RATE_TYPE_NODE))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	rate_node = devlink_rate_node_get_from_attrs(devlink, info->attrs);
+	if (!IS_ERR(rate_node))
+		return -EEXIST;
+	else if (rate_node == ERR_PTR(-EINVAL))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	rate_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*rate_node), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rate_node)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	rate_node->devlink = devlink;
+	rate_node->type = DEVLINK_RATE_TYPE_NODE;
+	rate_node->name = nla_strdup(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_NODE_NAME], GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rate_node->name) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_strdup;
+	}
+
+	err = ops->rate_node_new(rate_node, &rate_node->priv, info->extack);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_node_new;
+
+	err = devlink_nl_rate_set(rate_node, ops, info);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_rate_set;
+
+	list_add(&rate_node->list, &devlink->rate_list);
+	devlink_rate_notify(rate_node, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_NEW);
+	return 0;
+
+err_rate_set:
+	ops->rate_node_del(rate_node, rate_node->priv, info->extack);
+err_node_new:
+	kfree(rate_node->name);
+err_strdup:
+	kfree(rate_node);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int devlink_nl_cmd_rate_del_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
+					struct genl_info *info)
+{
+	struct devlink_rate *rate_node = info->user_ptr[1];
+	struct devlink *devlink = rate_node->devlink;
+	const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
+	int err;
+
+	devlink_rate_notify(rate_node, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_DEL);
+	err = ops->rate_node_del(rate_node, rate_node->priv, info->extack);
+	list_del(&rate_node->list);
+	kfree(rate_node->name);
+	kfree(rate_node);
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int devlink_nl_sb_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
 			      struct devlink_sb *devlink_sb,
 			      enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid,
@@ -2441,6 +2599,30 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_eswitch_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
 }
 
+static int devlink_rate_nodes_check(struct devlink *devlink, u16 mode,
+				    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate;
+	u16 old_mode;
+	int err;
+
+	if (!devlink->ops->eswitch_mode_get)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	err = devlink->ops->eswitch_mode_get(devlink, &old_mode);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	if (old_mode == mode)
+		return 0;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(devlink_rate, &devlink->rate_list, list)
+		if (devlink_rate_is_node(devlink_rate)) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Rate node(s) exists.");
+			return -EBUSY;
+		}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int devlink_nl_cmd_eswitch_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 					   struct genl_info *info)
 {
@@ -2455,6 +2637,9 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_eswitch_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		if (!ops->eswitch_mode_set)
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		mode = nla_get_u16(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_ESWITCH_MODE]);
+		err = devlink_rate_nodes_check(devlink, mode, info->extack);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
 		err = ops->eswitch_mode_set(devlink, mode, info->extack);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
@@ -8038,6 +8223,7 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_trap_policer_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TYPE] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
 	[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TX_SHARE] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
 	[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TX_MAX] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
+	[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_NODE_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING },
 };
 
 static const struct genl_small_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
@@ -8077,6 +8263,17 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_trap_policer_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		.internal_flags = DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_RATE,
 	},
 	{
+		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_NEW,
+		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_rate_new_doit,
+		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
+	},
+	{
+		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_DEL,
+		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_rate_del_doit,
+		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
+		.internal_flags = DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_RATE_NODE,
+	},
+	{
 		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_SPLIT,
 		.validate = GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT | GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP,
 		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_port_split_doit,
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-21 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-21 15:52 [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 00/18] devlink: rate objects API dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:52 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 01/18] netdevsim: Add max_vfs to bus_dev dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:52 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 02/18] netdevsim: Disable VFs on nsim_dev_reload_destroy() call dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:52 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 03/18] netdevsim: Implement port types and indexing dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:52 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 04/18] netdevsim: Implement VFs dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:52 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 05/18] netdevsim: Implement legacy/switchdev mode for VFs dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:52 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 06/18] devlink: Introduce rate object dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:52 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 07/18] netdevsim: Register devlink rate leaf objects per VF dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:52 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 08/18] selftest: netdevsim: Add devlink rate test dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:52 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 09/18] devlink: Allow setting tx rate for devlink rate leaf objects dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:52 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 10/18] netdevsim: Implement devlink rate leafs tx rate support dlinkin
2021-04-22 12:30   ` kernel test robot
2021-04-22 15:18   ` kernel test robot
2021-04-21 15:52 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 11/18] selftest: netdevsim: Add devlink port shared/max tx rate test dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:52 ` dlinkin [this message]
2021-04-21 21:31   ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 12/18] devlink: Introduce rate nodes kernel test robot
2021-04-21 21:32   ` kernel test robot
2021-04-23  9:37   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-23  9:37     ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-23 10:26     ` Dmytro Linkin
2021-04-21 15:53 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 13/18] netdevsim: Implement support for devlink " dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:53 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 14/18] selftest: netdevsim: Add devlink rate nodes test dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:53 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 15/18] devlink: Allow setting parent node of rate objects dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:53 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 16/18] netdevsim: " dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:53 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 17/18] selftest: netdevsim: Add devlink rate grouping test dlinkin
2021-04-21 15:53 ` [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 18/18] Documentation: devlink rate objects dlinkin
2021-04-21 22:27 [PATCH RESEND-2 RFC net-next 12/18] devlink: Introduce rate nodes kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1619020385-20220-13-git-send-email-dlinkin@nvidia.com \
    --to=dlinkin@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=vladbu@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.