All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kewei Xu <kewei.xu@mediatek.com>
To: <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <leilk.liu@mediatek.com>,
	<qii.wang@mediatek.com>, <yuhan.wei@mediatek.com>,
	<kewei.xu@mediatek.com>, <ot_daolong.zhu@mediatek.com>,
	<liguo.zhang@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 8/8] i2c: mediatek: modify bus speed calculation formula
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 18:17:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1626517079-9057-9-git-send-email-kewei.xu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1626517079-9057-1-git-send-email-kewei.xu@mediatek.com>

When clock-div is 0 or greater than 1, the bus speed
calculated by the old speed calculation formula will be
larger than the target speed. So we update the formula.

Signed-off-by: Kewei Xu <kewei.xu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
index 061775489380..45939f919085 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
@@ -68,11 +68,12 @@
 #define I2C_DEFAULT_CLK_DIV		5
 #define MAX_SAMPLE_CNT_DIV		8
 #define MAX_STEP_CNT_DIV		64
-#define MAX_CLOCK_DIV			256
+#define MAX_CLOCK_DIV_8BITS		256
+#define MAX_CLOCK_DIV_5BITS		32
 #define MAX_HS_STEP_CNT_DIV		8
-#define I2C_STANDARD_MODE_BUFFER	(1000 / 2)
-#define I2C_FAST_MODE_BUFFER		(300 / 2)
-#define I2C_FAST_MODE_PLUS_BUFFER	(20 / 2)
+#define I2C_STANDARD_MODE_BUFFER	(1000 / 3)
+#define I2C_FAST_MODE_BUFFER		(300 / 3)
+#define I2C_FAST_MODE_PLUS_BUFFER	(20 / 3)
 
 #define I2C_CONTROL_RS                  (0x1 << 1)
 #define I2C_CONTROL_DMA_EN              (0x1 << 2)
@@ -719,14 +720,26 @@ static int mtk_i2c_calculate_speed(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, unsigned int clk_src,
 	unsigned int best_mul;
 	unsigned int cnt_mul;
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	int clock_div_constraint = 0;
 
 	if (target_speed > I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ)
 		target_speed = I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ;
 
+	if (i2c->default_timing_adjust) {
+		clock_div_constraint = 0;
+	} else if (i2c->dev_comp->ltiming_adjust &&
+		   i2c->ac_timing.inter_clk_div > 1) {
+		clock_div_constraint = 1;
+	} else if (i2c->dev_comp->ltiming_adjust &&
+		   i2c->ac_timing.inter_clk_div == 0) {
+		clock_div_constraint = -1;
+	}
+
 	max_step_cnt = mtk_i2c_max_step_cnt(target_speed);
 	base_step_cnt = max_step_cnt;
 	/* Find the best combination */
-	opt_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_src >> 1, target_speed);
+	opt_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_src >> 1, target_speed) +
+		  clock_div_constraint;
 	best_mul = MAX_SAMPLE_CNT_DIV * max_step_cnt;
 
 	/* Search for the best pair (sample_cnt, step_cnt) with
@@ -761,7 +774,8 @@ static int mtk_i2c_calculate_speed(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, unsigned int clk_src,
 	sample_cnt = base_sample_cnt;
 	step_cnt = base_step_cnt;
 
-	if ((clk_src / (2 * sample_cnt * step_cnt)) > target_speed) {
+	if ((clk_src / (2 * (sample_cnt * step_cnt - clock_div_constraint))) >
+		 target_speed) {
 		/* In this case, hardware can't support such
 		 * low i2c_bus_freq
 		 */
@@ -848,13 +862,16 @@ static int mtk_i2c_set_speed_adjust_timing(struct mtk_i2c *i2c,
 	target_speed = i2c->speed_hz;
 	parent_clk /= i2c->clk_src_div;
 
-	if (i2c->dev_comp->timing_adjust)
-		max_clk_div = MAX_CLOCK_DIV;
+	if (i2c->dev_comp->timing_adjust && i2c->dev_comp->ltiming_adjust)
+		max_clk_div = MAX_CLOCK_DIV_5BITS;
+	else if (i2c->dev_comp->timing_adjust)
+		max_clk_div = MAX_CLOCK_DIV_8BITS;
 	else
 		max_clk_div = 1;
 
 	for (clk_div = 1; clk_div <= max_clk_div; clk_div++) {
 		clk_src = parent_clk / clk_div;
+		i2c->ac_timing.inter_clk_div = clk_div - 1;
 
 		if (target_speed > I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ) {
 			/* Set master code speed register */
@@ -901,8 +918,6 @@ static int mtk_i2c_set_speed_adjust_timing(struct mtk_i2c *i2c,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	i2c->ac_timing.inter_clk_div = clk_div - 1;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.18.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kewei Xu <kewei.xu@mediatek.com>
To: <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <leilk.liu@mediatek.com>,
	<qii.wang@mediatek.com>, <yuhan.wei@mediatek.com>,
	<kewei.xu@mediatek.com>, <ot_daolong.zhu@mediatek.com>,
	<liguo.zhang@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 8/8] i2c: mediatek: modify bus speed calculation formula
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 18:17:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1626517079-9057-9-git-send-email-kewei.xu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1626517079-9057-1-git-send-email-kewei.xu@mediatek.com>

When clock-div is 0 or greater than 1, the bus speed
calculated by the old speed calculation formula will be
larger than the target speed. So we update the formula.

Signed-off-by: Kewei Xu <kewei.xu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
index 061775489380..45939f919085 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
@@ -68,11 +68,12 @@
 #define I2C_DEFAULT_CLK_DIV		5
 #define MAX_SAMPLE_CNT_DIV		8
 #define MAX_STEP_CNT_DIV		64
-#define MAX_CLOCK_DIV			256
+#define MAX_CLOCK_DIV_8BITS		256
+#define MAX_CLOCK_DIV_5BITS		32
 #define MAX_HS_STEP_CNT_DIV		8
-#define I2C_STANDARD_MODE_BUFFER	(1000 / 2)
-#define I2C_FAST_MODE_BUFFER		(300 / 2)
-#define I2C_FAST_MODE_PLUS_BUFFER	(20 / 2)
+#define I2C_STANDARD_MODE_BUFFER	(1000 / 3)
+#define I2C_FAST_MODE_BUFFER		(300 / 3)
+#define I2C_FAST_MODE_PLUS_BUFFER	(20 / 3)
 
 #define I2C_CONTROL_RS                  (0x1 << 1)
 #define I2C_CONTROL_DMA_EN              (0x1 << 2)
@@ -719,14 +720,26 @@ static int mtk_i2c_calculate_speed(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, unsigned int clk_src,
 	unsigned int best_mul;
 	unsigned int cnt_mul;
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	int clock_div_constraint = 0;
 
 	if (target_speed > I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ)
 		target_speed = I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ;
 
+	if (i2c->default_timing_adjust) {
+		clock_div_constraint = 0;
+	} else if (i2c->dev_comp->ltiming_adjust &&
+		   i2c->ac_timing.inter_clk_div > 1) {
+		clock_div_constraint = 1;
+	} else if (i2c->dev_comp->ltiming_adjust &&
+		   i2c->ac_timing.inter_clk_div == 0) {
+		clock_div_constraint = -1;
+	}
+
 	max_step_cnt = mtk_i2c_max_step_cnt(target_speed);
 	base_step_cnt = max_step_cnt;
 	/* Find the best combination */
-	opt_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_src >> 1, target_speed);
+	opt_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_src >> 1, target_speed) +
+		  clock_div_constraint;
 	best_mul = MAX_SAMPLE_CNT_DIV * max_step_cnt;
 
 	/* Search for the best pair (sample_cnt, step_cnt) with
@@ -761,7 +774,8 @@ static int mtk_i2c_calculate_speed(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, unsigned int clk_src,
 	sample_cnt = base_sample_cnt;
 	step_cnt = base_step_cnt;
 
-	if ((clk_src / (2 * sample_cnt * step_cnt)) > target_speed) {
+	if ((clk_src / (2 * (sample_cnt * step_cnt - clock_div_constraint))) >
+		 target_speed) {
 		/* In this case, hardware can't support such
 		 * low i2c_bus_freq
 		 */
@@ -848,13 +862,16 @@ static int mtk_i2c_set_speed_adjust_timing(struct mtk_i2c *i2c,
 	target_speed = i2c->speed_hz;
 	parent_clk /= i2c->clk_src_div;
 
-	if (i2c->dev_comp->timing_adjust)
-		max_clk_div = MAX_CLOCK_DIV;
+	if (i2c->dev_comp->timing_adjust && i2c->dev_comp->ltiming_adjust)
+		max_clk_div = MAX_CLOCK_DIV_5BITS;
+	else if (i2c->dev_comp->timing_adjust)
+		max_clk_div = MAX_CLOCK_DIV_8BITS;
 	else
 		max_clk_div = 1;
 
 	for (clk_div = 1; clk_div <= max_clk_div; clk_div++) {
 		clk_src = parent_clk / clk_div;
+		i2c->ac_timing.inter_clk_div = clk_div - 1;
 
 		if (target_speed > I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ) {
 			/* Set master code speed register */
@@ -901,8 +918,6 @@ static int mtk_i2c_set_speed_adjust_timing(struct mtk_i2c *i2c,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	i2c->ac_timing.inter_clk_div = clk_div - 1;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kewei Xu <kewei.xu@mediatek.com>
To: <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <leilk.liu@mediatek.com>,
	<qii.wang@mediatek.com>, <yuhan.wei@mediatek.com>,
	<kewei.xu@mediatek.com>, <ot_daolong.zhu@mediatek.com>,
	<liguo.zhang@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 8/8] i2c: mediatek: modify bus speed calculation formula
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 18:17:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1626517079-9057-9-git-send-email-kewei.xu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1626517079-9057-1-git-send-email-kewei.xu@mediatek.com>

When clock-div is 0 or greater than 1, the bus speed
calculated by the old speed calculation formula will be
larger than the target speed. So we update the formula.

Signed-off-by: Kewei Xu <kewei.xu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
index 061775489380..45939f919085 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
@@ -68,11 +68,12 @@
 #define I2C_DEFAULT_CLK_DIV		5
 #define MAX_SAMPLE_CNT_DIV		8
 #define MAX_STEP_CNT_DIV		64
-#define MAX_CLOCK_DIV			256
+#define MAX_CLOCK_DIV_8BITS		256
+#define MAX_CLOCK_DIV_5BITS		32
 #define MAX_HS_STEP_CNT_DIV		8
-#define I2C_STANDARD_MODE_BUFFER	(1000 / 2)
-#define I2C_FAST_MODE_BUFFER		(300 / 2)
-#define I2C_FAST_MODE_PLUS_BUFFER	(20 / 2)
+#define I2C_STANDARD_MODE_BUFFER	(1000 / 3)
+#define I2C_FAST_MODE_BUFFER		(300 / 3)
+#define I2C_FAST_MODE_PLUS_BUFFER	(20 / 3)
 
 #define I2C_CONTROL_RS                  (0x1 << 1)
 #define I2C_CONTROL_DMA_EN              (0x1 << 2)
@@ -719,14 +720,26 @@ static int mtk_i2c_calculate_speed(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, unsigned int clk_src,
 	unsigned int best_mul;
 	unsigned int cnt_mul;
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	int clock_div_constraint = 0;
 
 	if (target_speed > I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ)
 		target_speed = I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ;
 
+	if (i2c->default_timing_adjust) {
+		clock_div_constraint = 0;
+	} else if (i2c->dev_comp->ltiming_adjust &&
+		   i2c->ac_timing.inter_clk_div > 1) {
+		clock_div_constraint = 1;
+	} else if (i2c->dev_comp->ltiming_adjust &&
+		   i2c->ac_timing.inter_clk_div == 0) {
+		clock_div_constraint = -1;
+	}
+
 	max_step_cnt = mtk_i2c_max_step_cnt(target_speed);
 	base_step_cnt = max_step_cnt;
 	/* Find the best combination */
-	opt_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_src >> 1, target_speed);
+	opt_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_src >> 1, target_speed) +
+		  clock_div_constraint;
 	best_mul = MAX_SAMPLE_CNT_DIV * max_step_cnt;
 
 	/* Search for the best pair (sample_cnt, step_cnt) with
@@ -761,7 +774,8 @@ static int mtk_i2c_calculate_speed(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, unsigned int clk_src,
 	sample_cnt = base_sample_cnt;
 	step_cnt = base_step_cnt;
 
-	if ((clk_src / (2 * sample_cnt * step_cnt)) > target_speed) {
+	if ((clk_src / (2 * (sample_cnt * step_cnt - clock_div_constraint))) >
+		 target_speed) {
 		/* In this case, hardware can't support such
 		 * low i2c_bus_freq
 		 */
@@ -848,13 +862,16 @@ static int mtk_i2c_set_speed_adjust_timing(struct mtk_i2c *i2c,
 	target_speed = i2c->speed_hz;
 	parent_clk /= i2c->clk_src_div;
 
-	if (i2c->dev_comp->timing_adjust)
-		max_clk_div = MAX_CLOCK_DIV;
+	if (i2c->dev_comp->timing_adjust && i2c->dev_comp->ltiming_adjust)
+		max_clk_div = MAX_CLOCK_DIV_5BITS;
+	else if (i2c->dev_comp->timing_adjust)
+		max_clk_div = MAX_CLOCK_DIV_8BITS;
 	else
 		max_clk_div = 1;
 
 	for (clk_div = 1; clk_div <= max_clk_div; clk_div++) {
 		clk_src = parent_clk / clk_div;
+		i2c->ac_timing.inter_clk_div = clk_div - 1;
 
 		if (target_speed > I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ) {
 			/* Set master code speed register */
@@ -901,8 +918,6 @@ static int mtk_i2c_set_speed_adjust_timing(struct mtk_i2c *i2c,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	i2c->ac_timing.inter_clk_div = clk_div - 1;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-17 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-17 10:17 [PATCH V4 0/8] Introduce an attribute to choose timing setting Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] i2c: mediatek: fixing the incorrect register offset Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] dt-bindings: i2c: update bindings for MT8195 SoC Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] i2c: mediatek: Reset the handshake signal between i2c and dma Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-08-11  8:41   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-08-11  8:41     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-08-11  8:41     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-08-21  7:40     ` Kewei Xu
2021-08-21  7:40       ` Kewei Xu
2021-08-21  7:40       ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] i2c: mediatek: Dump i2c/dma register when a timeout occurs Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] dt-bindings: i2c: add attribute default-timing-adjust Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-22  3:10   ` Rob Herring
2021-07-22  3:10     ` Rob Herring
2021-07-22  3:10     ` Rob Herring
2021-08-18  6:37     ` Kewei Xu
2021-08-18  6:37       ` Kewei Xu
2021-08-18  6:37       ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] i2c: mediatek: Add OFFSET_EXT_CONF setting back Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] i2c: mediatek: Isolate speed setting via dts for special devices Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` Kewei Xu [this message]
2021-07-17 10:17   ` [PATCH v4 8/8] i2c: mediatek: modify bus speed calculation formula Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17   ` Kewei Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1626517079-9057-9-git-send-email-kewei.xu@mediatek.com \
    --to=kewei.xu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leilk.liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=liguo.zhang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=ot_daolong.zhu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=qii.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=yuhan.wei@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.