From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Nikunj Kela <nkela@quicinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] dt-bindings: power: Clarify performance capabilities of power-domains
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:40:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <169444319926.1226593.2342724672076403322.robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230825112633.236607-11-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:26:30 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> The power-domains bindings has in many years been used to describe so
> called performance-domains too. Rather than using a separate binding it has
> been convenient to re-use the power-domain bindings, as in some cases it's
> in fact a combination of the both that would be the best description.
>
> Therefore, let's make it more clear that the power-domains bindings can be
> used to describe a performance-domain too.
>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - New patch.
>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Nikunj Kela <nkela@quicinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] dt-bindings: power: Clarify performance capabilities of power-domains
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:40:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <169444319926.1226593.2342724672076403322.robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230825112633.236607-11-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:26:30 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> The power-domains bindings has in many years been used to describe so
> called performance-domains too. Rather than using a separate binding it has
> been convenient to re-use the power-domain bindings, as in some cases it's
> in fact a combination of the both that would be the best description.
>
> Therefore, let's make it more clear that the power-domains bindings can be
> used to describe a performance-domain too.
>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - New patch.
>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-11 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-25 11:26 [PATCH v3 00/13] arm_scmi/cpufreq: Add generic performance scaling support Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend perf protocol ops to get number of domains Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend perf protocol ops to get information of a domain Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] cpufreq: scmi: Prepare to move OF parsing of domain-id to cpufreq Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 14:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-09-21 14:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Align perf ops to use domain-id as in-parameter Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 14:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-09-21 14:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop redundant ->device_domain_id() from perf ops Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] cpufreq: scmi: Avoid one OF parsing in scmi_get_sharing_cpus() Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 14:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-09-21 14:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] cpufreq: scmi: Drop redundant ifdef in scmi_cpufreq_probe() Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 11:14 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 11:14 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 13:02 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 13:02 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 13:29 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 13:29 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] dt-bindings: arm: cpus: Add a power-domain-name for a performance-domain Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-11 13:20 ` Rob Herring
2023-09-11 13:20 ` Rob Herring
2023-09-21 11:11 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 11:11 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 13:22 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 13:22 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 13:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 13:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Extend bindings for protocol@13 Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-11 13:20 ` Rob Herring
2023-09-11 13:20 ` Rob Herring
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] dt-bindings: power: Clarify performance capabilities of power-domains Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-11 14:40 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2023-09-11 14:40 ` Rob Herring
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] cpufreq: scmi: Add support to parse domain-id using #power-domain-cells Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 11:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 11:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 14:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-09-21 14:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] PM: domains: Allow genpd providers to manage OPP tables directly by its FW Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 11:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 11:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 13:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 13:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 13:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 13:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] genpd: arm: Add the SCMI performance domain Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-14 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] arm_scmi/cpufreq: Add generic performance scaling support Ulf Hansson
2023-09-14 22:45 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-18 10:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-18 10:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-19 10:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-19 10:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-25 9:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-25 9:39 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=169444319926.1226593.2342724672076403322.robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nkela@quicinc.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=psodagud@quicinc.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.