From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: ux500: Move struct
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:40:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1749867.D7qte28FRP@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKXHbyOhD5_cHRp02AuhcYFR5m8nBvWzdsygUdw689LrS9R67g@mail.gmail.com>
On Saturday 24 January 2015 18:33:00 Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> 2015-01-22 8:44 GMT+01:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>:
> >
> > Are you sure a struct is required at all now? It only contains a
> > single bool after all.
>
>
> Hi Lee
>
> Okay, I will gladly remove ab8500_ext_regulator_cfg completely.
> And I will try to update the comments, but since I'm not so familiar
> with what this code was meant to do it is a little more difficult.
>
Try to take small steps then: See if there is something in this code
that is either never called, or data structures that are only
written but never read, or pointers that are verifiably always
NULL, then eliminate one piece of the code at a time, with a patch
that explains what you found.
Try to make sure everything still builds after each patch, and note
that this was not the case with your first patch, though it would have
worked in the reverse order.
I suspect the best way forward is to actually move all of
ab8500_regulator_plat_data and whatever it references into
drivers/regulator/ab8500-ext.c because there now is only one
remaining instance of that. After this move, you can delete
a lot of code in arch/arm/mach-ux500 and possibly move all of
include/linux/regulator/ab8500.h into drivers/regulator/ab8500-ext.c
as well.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: ux500: Move struct
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:40:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1749867.D7qte28FRP@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKXHbyOhD5_cHRp02AuhcYFR5m8nBvWzdsygUdw689LrS9R67g@mail.gmail.com>
On Saturday 24 January 2015 18:33:00 Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> 2015-01-22 8:44 GMT+01:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>:
> >
> > Are you sure a struct is required at all now? It only contains a
> > single bool after all.
>
>
> Hi Lee
>
> Okay, I will gladly remove ab8500_ext_regulator_cfg completely.
> And I will try to update the comments, but since I'm not so familiar
> with what this code was meant to do it is a little more difficult.
>
Try to take small steps then: See if there is something in this code
that is either never called, or data structures that are only
written but never read, or pointers that are verifiably always
NULL, then eliminate one piece of the code at a time, with a patch
that explains what you found.
Try to make sure everything still builds after each patch, and note
that this was not the case with your first patch, though it would have
worked in the reverse order.
I suspect the best way forward is to actually move all of
ab8500_regulator_plat_data and whatever it references into
drivers/regulator/ab8500-ext.c because there now is only one
remaining instance of that. After this move, you can delete
a lot of code in arch/arm/mach-ux500 and possibly move all of
include/linux/regulator/ab8500.h into drivers/regulator/ab8500-ext.c
as well.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-24 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-21 23:09 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: ux500: Move struct Rickard Strandqvist
2015-01-21 23:09 ` Rickard Strandqvist
2015-01-21 23:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: ux500: Remove unused functions and structs Rickard Strandqvist
2015-01-21 23:09 ` Rickard Strandqvist
2015-01-22 7:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-22 7:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-22 7:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: ux500: Move struct Lee Jones
2015-01-22 7:44 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-24 17:33 ` Rickard Strandqvist
2015-01-24 17:33 ` Rickard Strandqvist
2015-01-24 21:40 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-01-24 21:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1749867.D7qte28FRP@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.